Effect of Turbidity on Algal Growth by WUN-CHENG WANG

Effect of Turbidity on Algal Growth by WUN-CHENG WANG

ISWS-74-CIR121 Circular 121 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Effect of Turbidity on Algal Growth by WUN-CHENG WANG ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY URBANA 1974 EFFECT OF TURBIDITY ON ALGAL GROWTH by Wun-Cheng Wang ABSTRACT A comparative study was made to determine the effect of water turbidity on algal growth. The growth of algae in Illinois River water which is characterized by turbid con• ditions and generally void of algal blooms was compared with algal growth in Fox River water which is generally clear except during periods of frequent algal blooms. Bi-weekly water samples were taken from the Illinois River at Peoria and the Fox River at Oswego and at Dayton. Half of each sample was filtered through 0.45 micrometer membrane filter to remove all particulate matter. The filtered portion and the remaining unfiltered sample were separately inoculated, and the algal growth potential of each frac• tion was determined under various incubation conditions. The experimental results suggest that high turbidity conditions retard algal growth, a light-inhibition effect. In some cases, however, particulate matter appeared to stimulate algal growth. INTRODUCTION The Illinois River is a nutrient-enriched stream. It con- the Fox River that is sustained and indeed propagated tains phosphorus levels reportedly among the highest in the throughout its entire length. The Illinois River, in turn, U. S. Public Health Service's nationwide stream monitoring does not sustain the algal densities emitted to it by the system.1 The river is also abundant in various forms of Fox River. It is obvious that the lack of algal blooms in the nitrogen and other plant nutrients.2 Under optimum lab- Illinois River is not caused by scarcity of seed organisms. oratory conditions, Illinois River water consistently sup- Mathis and Cummings investigated the distribution of ports algal growth densities unrivaled by other river water heavy metals in the Illinois River near Peoria. They ana• samples in the state.3 Yet the stream is conspicuously lyzed copper, nickel, lead, chromium, lithium, zinc, cobalt, lacking in significant numbers of aquatic vascular plants and cadmium from sediment, clams, tubificid worms, fish, and algal blooms. It appears muddy and barren, reflecting and water. They found that the chromium concentration a typical stream of low biological productivity. The ques- in Illinois River water was two orders of magnitude higher tion posed is: Why does the river appear sterile, without than that in other rivers in the United States, lithium and signs of vegetative life, when it contains abundant quanti- cobalt were one order of magnitude higher, and lead about ties of plant nutrients? Many hypotheses have been advanced, the same order of magnitude. Copper, nickel, and cadmium including the lack of seed organisms, presence of toxic sub- were one order of magnitude lower. The effect of heavy stances, and light inhibition. metals on algal growth is little understood, and what role The Fox River, a tributary to the Illinois River, is also a these metals play in the Illinois River situation is unknown. nutrient-enriched stream. The chemical qualities of its wa• Apparently there are some limiting factors other than ter are not unlike that of the Illinois River; however, it fre• plant nutrients and seed organisms which inhibit the growth quently supports algal blooms of nuisance proportions dur• of algae in the Illinois River. A likely factor is turbidity, ing the summer months. particularly since the Illinois River is laden with silt and The headwaters of the Fox River consist basically of the clay particles and its water exhibits a typical muddy appear• notoriously eutrophic Fox Chain of Lakes, a glacial lake ance year-round. Cheng5 reported that algal productivity in system. The Fox Chain of Lakes is a source of algae for Lakes Sorell and Crescent, Australia, was strongly influenced 1 by water turbidity. Mathis and Myers6 studied the commu- the effect of turbidity on algal growth, and this was done nity metabolism in Peoria Lake, a wide sector of the Illinois by comparing the waters from the Illinois and the Fox Rivers. River, and found that the lowest photosynthetic efficiency occurred during more turbid conditions. The gross photo- 2 synthesis ranged from 1.6 g/m /day O2 on June 28-29, 2 Acknowledgments 1968 (water turbidity 135 Jtu) to 13.8 g/m /day O2 on June 6-7, 1968 (water turbidity 40 to 50 Jtu). The chloro- This study was conducted under the general supervision phyll ranged from 0.03 g/m2 on June 28-29 to 0.23 g/m2 of Ralph L. Evans, Head of the Water Quality Section, and on June 6-7. McDonald and Schmickle7 found plankton Dr. William C. Ackermann, Chief, Illinois State Water Sur- organisms to be lowest in early spring when the water tur- vey. Many present and former Water Survey personnel bidity was highest. Claffey8 found the largest numbers of assisted in the study. William T. Sullivan, Daniel J. Brabec, plankton in clear water, fewer numbers at intermediate tur- and David L. Hullinger performed most of the chemical anal- bidity (25 to 50 mg/1), and the least number at higher tur- yses. Larry G. Epley performed most of the field work in- bidity. Butler9 reported that summer productivity in a clear volving collection of samples. Mrs. J. Loreena Ivens edited 2 pond (12 g/m /day O2 ) exceeded that in a turbid pond (4 the final report; Miss Katherine Shemas typed the original 2 g/m /day O2 ). The ratio of gross productivity to commu• manuscript; and John Brother, Jr., prepared the illustrations. nity respiration (P/R ratio) exceeded 1 in the clear pond Special thanks go to Dr. George P. Fitzgerald, University of but was less than 1 in the turbid pond. Many other investi• Wisconsin, Madison, for providing some laboratory space for gators10'11'12 have reported on the influence of turbidity on conducting one experiment and lending his time for lengthy aquatic plant growth. Thus it seemed prudent to examine discussions. METHODS The three stream sampling stations designated for this Filtered and unfiltered water samples from each of the study were Oswego and Dayton on the Fox River and sampling stations were individually placed in quart Mason Peoria on the Illinois River. Oswego is approximately 30 jars and inoculated with approximately 500,000 cells/ml. miles upstream from Dayton, and Dayton is 4 miles up- A 100-ml portion of a subsample was taken from each jar stream of the juncture where the Fox River flows into the and its initial organic biomass was determined as initial Illinois River. This 4-mile distance is considered safe from weight. Many laboratory experiments were run with water occasional backwater from the Illinois River into the Fox subsamples of varying degrees of turbidity. This was accom• River. The Peoria station is located about 80 miles below plished by mixing various portions of filtered and unfiltered the confluence of the Fox and Illinois Rivers. samples. The Mason jars were covered with polyurethane At 2-week intervals, grab samples were obtained at the foam and then placed for shaking and illumination. After water surface of each sampling site. As soon as they were a week of incubation, each water sample was individually delivered to the laboratory, they were divided into two equal mixed in the blender and the final organic biomass was de• portions. One half was filtered through an 0.45 micrometer termined. The organic biomass was measured as follows. (µm) membrane filter. The other half remained unfiltered An 0.45 µm membrane filter was prewashed with 0.5 N but was autoclaved. The filtered and unfiltered fractions hydrochloric acid and then washed with doubly deionized of each sample were refrigerated until needed. water. The filter was dried in an oven at 90 C for 1 hour The algal inoculum was obtained from the Illinois River. and the tare weight was determined to 0.01 mg by an electro- A portion of the river water was filtered through a crepe fil• balance. This preweighed filter was used to retain the partic• ter paper to remove most of the silt and zooplankton. The ulate matter above 0.45 µm. The filter with residue was filtrate in a quart Mason jar was placed on a reciprocating again heated in an oven at 90 C for 1 hour and weighed. shaker at 100 strokes per minute and illuminated at an in• This residual weight represents organic biomass and inor• tensity of 100 footcandles for 7 days. Because of the rich• ganic calcium carbonate. To remove the inorganic fraction, ness of the natural plant nutrient present, the algal inoculum the residue was washed with 0.5 N hydrochloric acid. The always developed successfully. Periphyton as well as phyto- filter was rinsed, dried, and weighed as usual. The final resi• plankton developed. After 7 days incubation, the vessel was due represented organic biomass only. The increase of or• scraped with a rubber policeman, then directly attached to ganic biomass from before and after incubation was defined a blender, and the contents mixed at a low speed for 20 sec• as algal growth. Detailed procedures for algal growth meas• onds. The inoculum culture was then visually homogeneous urements and their reliability have been previously reported.3 and ready to use. In addition, algal growth experiments were conducted 2 with bottled samples suspended in two 32-gallon round Illinois River at Peoria. Filtered and unfiltered fractions of plastic water tanks (22-inch-diameter, 24-inch height). One each sample were inoculated in triplicate, for a period of 14 tank was filled with tap water and the other with Illinois days, in both the Illinois and Fox Rivers.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us