Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Arizona

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Arizona

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Arizona ind power is one of the fastest-growing forms of economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Arizona new power generation in the United States. Industry to be $1.15 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at growth in 2007 was an astounding 45%. New wind 2.0 million tons, and annual water savings are 818 million Wpower installations constituted 30% of all new electric power gallons. installations. This growth is the result of many drivers, includ- ing increased economic competitiveness and favorable state Economic Benefits policies such as Renewable Portfolio Standards. However, new Building and operating 1000 MW of wind power requires wind power installations provide more than cost-competitive a significant investment. But this investment will generate electricity. Wind power brings economic development to rural substantial direct, indirect, and induced economic benefits for regions, reduces water consumption in the electric power Arizona. Direct benefits include jobs, land-lease payments, and sector, and reduces greenhouse gas production by displacing increased tax revenues. Indirect benefits include benefits to fossil fuels. businesses that support the wind farm. Induced benefits result The U.S. Department of Energy’s Wind Powering America from additional spending on goods and services in the area Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers surrounding the development. and other stakeholders about the economic, CO emissions, 2 Direct impacts result from investment in the planning, devel- and water conservation benefits of wind power. This analysis opment, and operation of new wind facilities. Beneficiaries highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power include landowners, construction workers, O&M staff, turbine in Arizona. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW manufacturers, and project managers. Indirect impacts reflect of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already payments made to businesses that support the wind facility reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative and include banks financing the Arizona Economic Impacts project, component suppliers, and manufacturers of equipment used from 1,000 MW of New Wind Development to install and maintain the facility. Induced benefits result from Wind Energy’s Economic “Ripple Effect” increased spending by direct and indirect beneficiaries. Examples include increased business to res- taurants, retail establishments, Direct Impacts Indirect and Totals and child care providers. Induced Impacts (construction + Payments to Landowners: • $2.7 million/year Construction Phase: 20 years) Drivers of economic benefits Local Property Tax Revenue: • 1,495 new jobs Total Economic Benefit: include the use of local construc- • $6.2 million/year • $146.4 million to local $1.15 billion tion companies, the presence of Construction Phase: economies New Local Jobs During in-state component suppliers, Operational Phase: Construction: 2,903 • 1,408 new jobs local wage structures, local prop- • $188.5 million to local economies • 196 local jobs New Local Long-term erty tax structures, and operation Operational Phase: • $19.7 million/year to Jobs: 427 • 231 new long-term jobs local economies and maintenance (O&M) expen- • $21.2 million/year to local ditures. The projected benefits economies for Arizona could be greatly increased by the development of a local wind supply, installation, and maintenance industry within Construction Phase = 1-2 years the state. Operational Phase = 20+ years Arizona Distribution of Wind Resources in Arizona Resource Advocates and calculated from EIA form 767 data and EPRI publications. Consumption rates are applied to the NERC region generation mix as determined from EIA form 960/920 (2006). Data Inputs Construction Cost $1,650/kW Operations and Maintenance $24.70/kW/yr Property Tax $6,175/MW/year Landowner Lease Payments $2,667/MW/year CO2 Emissions and Water Conservation Benefits In 2004, the average Arizona resident emitted approximately 10.5 tons of CO2 from electricity consumption. As a state, rd Arizona ranked 23 in electricity sector per capita CO2 emis- sions. CO2 emissions are increasingly important factors as state and federal government consider policies regarding climate change while drought in the Southeast has under- scored the relevance of freshwater supply issues throughout the United States. Developing wind power in Arizona will result in CO2 emis- sions reductions and water savings. Choosing to build wind projects results in CO2 reductions from decreased natural gas consumption. In addition, both fossil- and nuclear-based electricity generation consume large amounts of water. Wind power reduces our reliance on increasingly vital freshwater resources. Methodology Annual Impacts in Arizona from 1000 MW The data for economic analysis are primarily from interviews of New Wind Power with state-specific contacts, including developers, power plant operators, contractors, mining and gas associations, and state Water Savings CO2 Savings property tax assessors or administrators. When interviews 818 million gallons 2.0 million tons were not possible, information was obtained from public Web resources, state tax reports, and federal databases for current power plants. Cumulative impacts are estimated for construc- For more information, contact: tion and 20 years of operations. Economic impacts are 2007 constant dollars and estimated by application of NREL’s Jobs Eric Lantz, [email protected] and Economic Development Impacts (JEDI) model. Carbon Suzanne Tegen, [email protected] estimates apply 2004 non-baseload CO2 emissions rates (EPA Wind Powering America eGRID2006 Version 2.1, April 2007). Water savings are calcu- National Renewable Energy Laboratory lated based on consumption rates for various generating 1617 Cole Blvd. MS3811 technologies. Consumption rates were compiled by Western Golden, CO 80401 A Strong Energy Portfolio for a Strong America Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) For more information contact: NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy EERE Information Center Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) environment, and greater energy independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, www.eere.energy.gov community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% Efficiency and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies. wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste October 2008 • DOE/GO-102008-2670.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us