Policy Foresight Programme Director: Sir Crispin Tickell Record of the Workshop on Biodiversity: Science & Religion 2 November 2007 James Martin Institute University of Oxford Policy Foresight Programme Biodiversity: Science & Religion 2 November 2007 James Martin Institute University of Oxford Contact: [email protected] Synopsis A day-long seminar was held at the James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization on Biodiversity: Science and Religion on 2 November 2007. The seminar was designed to bring together scientists and religious leaders to promote better understanding in both communities of the vital importance of conserving biodiversity. Biographies of the main speakers are attached. Sir Crispin Tickell welcomed the participants and gave a brief explanation of the Policy Foresight Programme. He said that the present seminar had first been suggested by Mr Alex Kirby, following on from a seminar on the same subject in the United States in January 2007. The initiative for the US seminar had led to a public statement entitled An Urgent Call to Action: Scientists and Evangelicals Unite to Protect Creation , signed by leaders from both communities. The initiative for the US seminar had in turn come from Professor E O Wilson at Harvard who had written about the subject in his book The Creation . Professor Wilson had originally intended to attend the Oxford seminar in the course of a visit to Britain, but in the event he had been obliged to cancel the visit. Nonetheless he sent his best wishes to the Oxford seminar. The first speaker was Professor Richard Fortey who gave an overview of convergent threats to the natural world and prospects for the future. He said that, while there were big differences between the two communities, more united than divided them. Conservation of biodiversity raised a host of other issues, ranging from climate change to human population increase. For example, some religious fundamentalists still challenged evolution by natural selection. Others sought to prohibit controls on human reproduction. Many saw science as fundamentally antireligious. For their part some scientists rejected religion all together as an impediment to understanding the natural environment, and policies to protect it. Current pressures for globalization and respect for market forces had almost created a religious conviction in itself. Perhaps the spiritual side of humanity might eventually impose some brake upon the headlong rush for economic growth and the pursuit of goods as a good in itself. For Professor Fortey, conservation of biodiversity was a moral imperative. Other species had a right to exist and we humans had a duty not to accelerate their extinction. As a species, we had no dispensation to treat the world as a convenience store for human welfare. The average duration of a species in the fossil record was about a million years. Humans in their present form had only been around for around for a tenth of that time. Biodiversity: Science & Religion 2 November 2007 In discussion the following points were made: - For the Abrahamic religions the end of the book of Job and the second creation story in Genesis contained passages to support arguments for biodiversity. The story of the Flood also contained a covenant between humans and the natural world. - There were many arguments for conserving species, from the ethical to the economic to simple self-interest. - Much effort had been put by Christians into issues of development, but development was scarcely possible without bringing in the effects of climate change and the need for conservation of biodiversity. Dame Jessica Rawson then spoke about the Chinese approach to religion and biodiversity. In doing so she drew a sharp distinction between the thinking behind revealed religion and its codes of practice, whether in Christianity, Judaism or Islam, and that behind Chinese philosophy and cosmology. The Chinese had no written Bible, Qur'an or creed. Their philosophy was a combination of Taoism and Confucianism in which they sought to establish a balance between opposing forces in the universe which led to overall harmony. The fundamental aim was to accept a duality in both the natural world and the human species, and to work out the right relationship between the two. This had a number of social and political consequences: respect for ancestral traditions, for hierarchy, for central authority, and for the workings of nature, however inconvenient that might be. Authority had a mandate, whether from heaven or elsewhere, and if that mandate were abused people had the right to challenge it. To this day the government of China had some of the attributes of the former emperors; witness the use of astronomy in government choice of auspicious predictions for policy. We should give more respect to the long and successful Chinese traditions in science and engineering. Their technical feats and mathematical skills far exceeded those of the rest of the world in their time. In their own way, the Chinese search for harmony, and their respect for nature as it is meant that they did not share our sense of responsibility for extinctions of other species or depletion of natural resources. The good of the whole was more important than damage to its parts. Just as everything we did derived from our cultural and religious traditions, so their culture was formed by their past. It was interesting that they did not distinguish between the picture of a butterfly or the real butterfly and saw both as having the intrinsic qualities of the butterfly. The dangers of each culture misunderstanding the other, the more so after the growth of market forces in China and cultivation of individual consumer wealth, were now manifested. On the whole, they understood us better than we understood them. In discussion the following points were made: - The Chinese government was well aware of the environmental problems facing China, in particular the destruction of biodiversity, but individual provinces and local communities were often more interested in creating wealth, and thereby increasing pollution and environmental damage. - What could seem like cruelty to us could be harmony to the Chinese. The Chinese had a stronger sense of inevitability, and felt that some of the penalties imposed by nature could not be helped. Policy Foresight Programme James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization Tel: 01285 740 569 [email protected] Biodiversity: Science & Religion 2 November 2007 Ms Claire Foster then spoke about work enhancing respect for biodiversity within the Church of England. She admitted that some Christian concerns in this respect were relatively recent but now there was a need to make sure that the language of the Church took proper account of environmental issues. People now realized better than they had the web of interdependence between all living organisms and their physical environment. It was like a spider's web. When a few of the stands were cut, the web could still remain intact, but cut one more and the entire thing could collapse. So it was with the environment. Christians believed that the creation was sacred. There was nothing that was not loved by God. Likewise as all things were part of creation, there was no away to which we could throw things away. Respect for the Sabbath had a strong connection with the environment. Not only was it a day of rest for humans but also for the land they tilled. It illustrated the limitations of the material world and the need for regeneration. Current efforts to promote the environmental dimension into Church of England thinking and work had largely been successful. The initial requirement to persuade religions of all kinds that conservation was a serious issue had been met. The problem now was to maintain the momentum. In discussion the following points were made: - There had been discussion about whether arguments over evolution by natural selection or intelligent design should come into the environmental debate. In some respects this was an argument between science and what seemed to others a lunatic fringe, but nearly all churches now fully accepted the scientific thesis in one form or another. - While children were already taught about the environment and biodiversity in schools (to some extent in Sunday school as well) it was necessary to ensure that this teaching survived into adulthood. - We needed strong religious leaders to help us make the transition into new ways of running society and living our individual lives. After lunch Ms Camilla Toulmin spoke about the prospects for cooperation between scientific and religious communities in working to conserve the Earth's good health, including its biodiversity. In many ways, environmentalism had almost become a new religion, and the battle for space on the political agenda was often won by being able to frame biodiversity issues in terms of economics and finance (as in the recent Stern review on the effects of climate change on the global economy). This might mean more radical change in the future than most people believed necessary. There was of course no single solution to the range of issues that conservation of biodiversity raised. The starting point for instituting changes in behaviour was to understand why current behaviour was still in place. In discussion the following points were made: - While work was under way to develop international institutions to look at the effects of environmental change on human behaviour (as in the International Human Dimensions Programme), it seemed unlikely that spiritual factors would be fully taken into account. - The usefulness of trying to monetize the importance of biodiversity was often challenged. The focus should be on the value of biodiversity rather than its Policy Foresight Programme James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization Tel: 01285 740 569 [email protected] Biodiversity: Science & Religion 2 November 2007 economics. There could be circumstances where one argument was better than the other, but for many the economic arguments were seen as weak.