Cambridge House, Knowl View and Rochdale Investigation Report April 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 26 of the Inquiries Act 2005 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 25 April 2018 A report of the Inquiry Panel HC 954-III © Crown copyright 2018 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications ISBN 978-1-5286-0290-7 CCS0318279676 04/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary iii Images, maps and plans vii Part A: Introduction 1 The background to the investigation 2 Cyril Smith 3 Knowl View School 5 Reasons for investigating Rochdale and issues considered 8 Standards and terminology 10 References 10 Part B: Cambridge House 11 Background and Cyril Smith’s involvement 12 Allegations made to Lyndon Price in 1965 16 The Lancashire Constabulary investigation 1969–70 17 The Director of Public Prosecutions 20 The office and powers of the Director of Public Prosecutions in 1970 20 The decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions 21 The 1979 Rochdale Alternative Paper articles 25 The Director of Public Prosecutions and the press in 1979 28 Cyril Smith’s knighthood 30 The decisions by the Crown Prosecution Service in 1998 and 1999, and the review in 2012 32 The Greater Manchester Police investigation 1998–99 35 Local rumours about Cyril Smith 36 Allegations of a pact between Labour and the Liberal Democrats 36 Part C: Knowl View School 39 Section 1: Introduction to Knowl View School 40 Knowl View School: the early years 43 Roderick Hilton 47 Smith Street toilets 50 Peer-on-peer abuse at Knowl View School 56 Section 2: The Hilton incident 59 The involvement of Dr Alison Fraser 64 i The meeting of 4 March 1991 66 The Shepherd report 68 The appointment of Stephen Bradshaw 72 Section 3: The Middleton case 78 The Mellor report 79 Her Majesty’s Inspectorate report 84 Further investigations 84 The Cavanagh Report June 1992 89 Second Mellor review 91 Ongoing issues with Roderick Hilton 92 Harry Wild and Cyril Smith 94 Concluding remarks 97 Part D: Police Investigations 99 Police Involvement in Knowl View School 100 Investigations after the Mellor Report 105 Roderick Hilton 107 Operation Cleopatra 108 Operation Jaguar 110 Operation Clifton 112 Part E: Political Accountability 113 Richard Farnell 114 Paul Rowen 124 Culture 128 Elizabeth Lynne, Lorna Fitzsimons, Colin Lambert and Detective Superintendent Huntbach 129 Part F: Other Institutions 133 Foxholes Children’s Home 134 Dennis Leckey 134 Anthony Andrews 136 Raymond Cullens 137 Part G: Conclusions 139 Cambridge House and the involvement of Cyril Smith 140 Knowl View School 142 Police investigations 144 Political accountability 144 Other institutions 145 Annex 147 ii Executive Summary This investigation report concerns child sexual abuse in Rochdale, relating to Cambridge House, Knowl View School and the late Cyril Smith. We are primarily concerned with the institutional responses of Rochdale Borough Council, the police and the Crown Prosecution Service. Smith first came to prominence as a local councillor, then Mayor and later as Member of Parliament from 1972 until his retirement in 1992. He died in 2010. Cambridge House was a hostel for working boys run by a voluntary organisation of which Smith was Honorary Secretary, and was open from 1962 to 1965. He had ready access to the boys living in the hostel, allegedly facilitating his sexual abuse of them under the guise of ‘medical examinations’ including, in most cases, of a boy’s private parts. He also administered punishment for truancy, illness or absconding, which included spanking a bare bottom. He told police in a written statement in 1970 that at all times he was acting ‘in loco parentis’ to the boys, but we found it inexplicable that he thought his role permitted ‘medical examinations’ when he had no medical qualifications. He had considerable control over which boys were admitted to the hostel and, in general, showed a strong, perhaps unduly detailed, interest in children in care as his political career developed. This interest appeared to go unchallenged by the Council. Cyril Smith’s prominence and standing in Rochdale allowed him to exert influence on others locally – in particular, to put pressure on them to keep quiet about any allegations of abuse. Although the Lancashire Constabulary investigation into Smith pursued the allegations robustly and diligently, the Director of Public Prosecutions advised that there should be no prosecution. It has been suggested that Smith or his supporters may have exerted improper influence on the Director of Public Prosecutions, but there is no evidence to support such an allegation. Valuable opportunities were, however, lost in 1998 and 1999 to charge and prosecute Smith during his lifetime, and for the complainants of his alleged abuse to seek justice. Smith’s standing in public life increased, and in 1988 he was awarded a knighthood for his political services. It is clear that there were some frank discussions at the highest political level about the rumours in circulation about him, with no obvious concern for alleged victims. Rather, the concern was about what would be fair to Smith and whether the honours system might subsequently be brought into disrepute. We concluded that this demonstrated a considerable deference to power and an unwillingness to confront the possibility that a person of public prominence might be capable of perpetrating sexual abuse. Cyril Smith’s links to Knowl View School in Rochdale led the Inquiry to a wider investigation of that school and allegations of sexual abuse by other individuals of children who lived there. It was the sexual abuse of children by others that became iii the focus of the Inquiry’s investigation. We heard from complainants of sexual abuse who had been at Knowl View School in a period extending over 25 years, beginning in 1969. The evidence demonstrated that the children who attended the school had a range of complex needs, including learning disabilities, autism and mental health. Many had also suffered from adverse experiences in their family life and had already been abused. We concluded that, far from taking additional steps to protect these children, the school and other institutions had come to regard their sexual abuse while at Knowl View as almost expected, or as something that could not be prevented. The children’s experience of the school was extremely poor at the most basic level of the fabric of the building, which bore no resemblance to a homely environment. Nor was the school safe, secure, caring or therapeutic. It was supposed to offer education and care, but in reality it offered neither in any way that could be seen as adequate, let alone nurturing. The institution failed in its basic function to keep children in its care safe from harm and, in particular, safe from sexual harm, both within and outwith the school. Child sexual abuse involving children from Knowl View occurred from its early years onwards. Within the school there was sexual abuse of boys by staff, and of younger boys by older ones. Sexual exploitation of some boys was also taking place in Rochdale town centre, in the public toilets and bus station, by men paying for sex. Some boys were also trafficked to other towns for that purpose. In a particularly shocking incident in 1990, Roderick Hilton, a known sex offender who had previously been convicted of sexually abusing a boy at Knowl View in 1984, gained access to the school and the boys over two nights, when he indecently assaulted at least one of them. Hilton was well known to the staff of the school, who did nothing over many years to deter him targeting the school. He was imprisoned in 1991 for a series of child sexual offences. Despite this, on his release from prison on licence, he continued to be a malign presence at the school, ‘little’ was done to stop Hilton’s continued access to the grounds and buildings. For most of the school’s existence, staff were at best complacent but arguably complicit in the abuse they knew to be taking place, and they must take their share of the blame for what was allowed to occur. It was our strong conclusion that Knowl View staff simply treated the sexual abuse between boys as ‘normal’, without differentiating between what was experimentation and what was coercive and intimidating. There was little evidence that the school appreciated the profound harm that peer-on-peer sexual abuse could cause. Sexual exploitation of children from the school at Smith Street public toilets was known about by the authorities from at least 1989. Indeed, some Social Services’ staff could see the toilets from their offices, recognised some of the boys as children in care and were deeply suspicious of what was going on, although there was no apparent follow-up. The records of individual children convey a total lack of urgency on the part of the authorities to address the problem and treat the matters involved for what they were – serious sexual assaults.