Second Amended Consolidated Reseller Dealership Class Action

Second Amended Consolidated Reseller Dealership Class Action

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1805 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 116 1 Elizabeth J. Cabraser (State Bar No. 083151) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 2 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 3 Telephone: 415.956.1000 Facsimile: 415.956.1008 4 E-mail: ecabraser@lchb.com 5 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs (Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee Members 6 Listed on Signature Page) 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN ‘CLEAN DIESEL’ MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND MDL 2672 CRB (JSC) 13 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 14 This Document Relates to: 15 SECOND AMENDED A to Z Autosports, LLC, and MSI Auto Sales CONSOLIDATED RESELLER 16 And Repair, Inc., v. Volkswagen Group of DEALERSHIP CLASS ACTION America, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-05963-CRB COMPLAINT 17 (transferred from W.D. Wis., Case No. 3:15- cv-00664-WMC) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND AM. CONSOL. RESELLER DEALERSHIP 1315109.1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT MDL 2672 CRB (JSC) Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1805 Filed 09/02/16 Page 2 of 116 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 4 JURISDICTION AND VENUE ............................................................................................... 5 PARTIES .................................................................................................................................. 6 5 A. Individual and Representative Plaintiffs ................................................................. 6 6 B. Defendants .............................................................................................................. 6 7 1. Volkswagen Defendants ................................................................................ 6 a. Volkswagen AG ................................................................................... 6 8 b. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. .................................................... 7 9 c. Audi AG ............................................................................................... 7 10 d. Audi of America, LLC ......................................................................... 8 e. Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG .................................................................. 8 11 f. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. ........................................................ 8 12 g. Martin Winterkorn ................................................................................ 9 13 h. Matthias Müller .................................................................................... 9 i. Michael Horn ...................................................................................... 10 14 j. Rupert Stadler ..................................................................................... 10 15 2. Bosch Defendants ........................................................................................ 11 16 b. Robert Bosch GmbH .......................................................................... 11 c. Robert Bosch, LLC ............................................................................. 12 17 d. Volkmar Denner ................................................................................. 12 18 COMMON FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS .............................................................................. 13 19 A. Volkswagen’s Plot to Dominate the Automotive Market ..................................... 13 B. Defendants’ Illegal “Defeat Device” Scheme ....................................................... 19 20 C. Bosch Played a Critical Role in the Defeat Device Scheme ................................. 25 21 1. Volkswagen and Bosch Conspire to Develop the Illegal Defeat Device .......................................................................................................... 25 22 2. Volkswagen and Bosch Conspire to Conceal the Illegal 23 “Akustikfunktion” ........................................................................................ 33 3. Volkswagen and Bosch Conspire in the U.S. and Germany to Elude 24 U.S. Regulators ............................................................................................ 36 25 4. Bosch Keeps Volkswagen’s Secret Safe and Pushes “Clean” Diesel in the U.S. .................................................................................................... 40 26 5. Defendant Denner Also Played a Critical Role in the Scheme .................... 43 27 D. Porsche Knowingly Adopts the Defeat Device in Its 3.0-liter Class Vehicles ................................................................................................................. 44 28 E. Volkswagen’s “Clean” Diesel Advertising Campaign ......................................... 46 - i - CONSOLIDATED AM. RESELLER DEALERSHIP 1315109.1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT MDL 2672 CRB (JSC) Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1805 Filed 09/02/16 Page 3 of 116 1 2. VW’s False and Misleading Advertisements ............................................... 46 2 3. Audi’s False and Misleading Advertisements ............................................. 56 4. Porsche’s False and Misleading Advertisements ......................................... 60 3 5. Volkswagen’s Nationwide Advertising Campaign Was Highly 4 Effective, and Volkswagen Profited Handsomely from Selling the Class Vehicles .............................................................................................. 61 5 F. Defendants’ Dirty Diesel Scheme Starts to Unravel ............................................. 62 6 G. Once Caught, Volkswagen Admits its Fraud—in Part ......................................... 64 H. Volkswagen’s Failed Attempts at Remedial Action ............................................. 75 7 I. Volkswagen Caused Billions of Dollars in Harm to U.S. Consumers .................. 76 8 TOLLING OF THE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS .......................................................... 80 9 PLAINTIFFS’ FACTS ............................................................................................................ 82 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS ....................................................................................... 82 10 CLAIMS FOR RELIEF .......................................................................................................... 87 11 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)-(d) The Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) ........................ 87 12 B. Description of the Defeat Device RICO Enterprise .............................................. 89 13 2. The Volkswagen Entity Defendants ............................................................ 90 14 3. The Volkswagen Entity Defendants’ Directors, Officers, and Engineers ..................................................................................................... 92 15 b. Martin Winterkorn .............................................................................. 92 16 c. Matthias Müller .................................................................................. 93 d. Michael Horn ...................................................................................... 93 17 e. Rupert Stadler ..................................................................................... 94 18 f. Scott Keogh ........................................................................................ 94 19 g. Detlev von Platen ............................................................................... 95 h. Ulrich Hackenberg .............................................................................. 95 20 i. Frank Tuch .......................................................................................... 96 21 j. Wolfgang Hatz .................................................................................... 97 22 4. The Bosch Defendants ................................................................................. 97 C. The Defeat Device RICO Enterprise Sought to Increase Defendants’ 23 Profits and Revenues ............................................................................................. 98 24 D. Mail and Wire Fraud ........................................................................................... 102 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF: FRAUD ................................................................ 107 25 THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF: FAILURE TO RECALL/RETROFIT ..................... 109 26 FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF: UNJUST ENRICHMENT ................................... 110 27 PRAYER FOR RELIEF ....................................................................................................... 110 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ............................................................................................ 111 28 SECOND AM. CONSOL. RESELLER DEALERSHIP 1315109.1 - ii - CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT MDL 2672 CRB (JSC) Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1805 Filed 09/02/16 Page 4 of 116 1 Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 2 against (1) the Defendants collectively known as “Volkswagen”: Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft 3 (“VW AG”), Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“VW America”) (together, “VW”), Audi 4 Aktiengesellschaft (“Audi AG”), Audi of America, LLC (“Audi America”) (together, “Audi”), 5 Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft (“Porsche AG”), Porsche Cars North America, Inc. 6 (“Porsche America”) (together, “Porsche”), Martin Winterkorn (“Winterkorn”), Matthias Müller 7 (“Müller”),

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    116 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us