Newcastle University e-prints Date deposited: 23 February 2010 Version of file: Published, final Peer Review Status: Peer reviewed Citation for published item: Veit-Wilson J. Remembering Peter Townsend. Poverty 133 2009, Summer 2009 22. Further information on publisher website: http://www.cpag.org.uk/ Publishers copyright statement: The definitive version of this article was published by Child Poverty Action Group, 2009. The definitive version should always be used when citing. Use Policy: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not for profit purposes provided that: • A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • A link is made to the metadata record in Newcastle e-prints • The full text is not changed in any way. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Robinson Library, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1 7RU. Tel. 0191 222 6000 obituary the aged. Even today, we are transfixed by the Remembering Peter combination of empirical quantitative research, passionate, beautiful writing and outrage at Townsend the conditions of old people in poor law institutions. His studies of old people were Peter Townsend was one of CPAG’s founders followed by his mammoth The Aged in the and our president. Despite his diverse interests Welfare State (with Wedderburn in 1965). and the many demands on his time, he still made the occasional visit to our offices, joining But Peter’s great work, Poverty in the United in with the policy debates and urging us to Kingdom , was not published until 1979 – think more radically and be more visionary. 1,216 pages and ten years after the survey on Both courteous and challenging, I often felt which it is based – for reasons he explains in that Peter thought we were just not quite bold the preface and which still make me wince to enough. read: they recruited their own field force, and the London School of Economics and Perhaps he was right. The calls in CPAG’s University of Essex computers were recent manifesto to reduce reliance on means- incompatible and so they had to enter the data tested benefits, increase universal child benefit twice. It is amazing that it was ever completed. and provide more help for the unemployed, It is a Great Work, the place from which disabled and lone parents repeat many of the poverty researchers should start. arguments that appeared in the CPAG manifesto of 1969. No wonder Peter was I am going to mention just three elements. His impatient for us to go faster and work harder first contribution was to conceptualise poverty to avoid another generation of children as relative. Others, notably Gary Runciman experience the damage of poverty. (1967), had written about relative deprivation but Peter did it earlier, mainly in his criticisms A conversation with Peter was always a of the absolutist biological understandings of pleasure. His interests were wide-ranging and, Rowntree and Beveridge. It must have been while this meant discussions sometimes hard reasoning at the time, but it was an idea veered off course, they always provided new which was nothing less than scintillating; a and more imaginative perspectives on familiar genuine shift in the paradigm. As he pointed problems. He had a special place in the hearts out, understanding poverty as relative to a and minds of both staff and members of time and place was the only way in which we CPAG, and he will be sorely missed. But we could reconcile talking about poverty in the will do everything we can to ensure that his nineteenth and twentieth centuries: the only legacy lives on, and his hopes and dreams for way to reconcile poverty in Ethiopia and a society free of relative poverty is fulfilled. ■ Luxembourg. Kate Green , Chief Executive Child Poverty Action This re-conceptualisation was enormously Group influential. It was more or less immediately put into operation in the UK in the Low Income Statistics and then, more fully by Mrs Thatcher In the ten years between the mid-1950s and in the Households Below Average Income the mid-1960s Peter Townsend published series. Today, we monitor the poverty strategy three of the most outstanding social policy with regard to relative poverty – 60 per cent of studies ever produced in this country. the conventional average – as does the European Union, LIS, the OECD and UNICEF. In 1953, when Peter was 25, he produced the The US government still holds out against work that began to transform how we thought defining poverty as relative, although its about poverty in a seminal article in the British poverty line was relative when Molly Journal of Sociology on the meaning of poverty. Orshanksy developed it in 1961. The World He followed this up with another British Bank is the other important body that has not Journal of Sociology article on measuring given way to relative notions. Its $1 a day per poverty in 1962 and, in 1965 (with Brian Abel- capita is firmly absolutist. Peter’s definition of Smith) he published the Poor and Poorest . In relative poverty referred to individuals 1957 he published his superb interview and ‘excluded from ordinary living patterns, observational study of the Family Life of Old customs and activities’ long before social People , and in 1962 he published The Last exclusion became part of our discourse. Refuge – a survey of residential institutions for 18 Poverty 133 obituary Peter’s second contribution in the field of Peter Townsend was often introduced as the poverty was to get us to think about ‘country’s greatest social scientist’, a resources. Poverty had been understood description which would cause him to visibly economically as a lack of income (or spending squirm. He was a surprisingly modest and power), but he argued it was concerned with self-effacing man. I never once heard him call much more – working conditions, the quality of himself a ‘professor’, let alone boast about his the local environment, capacity to participate achievements – and there were so many in social activities, access to assets ‘widely achievements he could have boasted about. encouraged and approved’ and socially The other frequent description of Peter, by determined, and the availability of services and both academic colleagues and administrative capital. It was for this reason that he staff alike, was as the ‘best boss I ever had’. pioneered the use of social indicators to There are few people (however brilliant) who measure poverty, counting the number of achieve this accolade. items that were lacking. For this he was much criticised. Some of the criticisms were dealt His staff and colleagues would often work long with by Mack and Lansley in the first Breadline hours and go to extraordinary lengths to make Britain survey and Peter Townsend was an sure that something Peter wanted was enthusiastic participant in the second and third delivered on time. They would then invariably Breadline Britain surveys that led eventually to try to hide the trouble they had gone to in this government complementing its income- order not to embarrass him. Few people based poverty measures with an index based inspire such loyalty. on a lack of socially perceived necessities. A recent article about Peter in the Guardian The third element in Peter’s poverty work is stated that: ‘For four decades… he has the way he classified groups. He was not doggedly used his academic expertise to urge alone in this: Seebohm Rowntree had made a governments to eradicate inequality’. This is, start. But Peter took it to another level. In of course, not correct: Peter Townsend did this Poverty in the United Kingdom he organised for much longer than a mere four decades. If his research assistants around groups – Hilary he had ceased all academic work 40 years Land worked on large families, John Veit ago, he would still be recognised today as one Wilson on disabled people, Adrian Sinfield on of the world’s greatest social scientists. Forty the unemployed and Dennis Marsden on lone- years ago, Peter had already revolutionised parent families. Thanks to Peter, we no longer our theoretical understanding of the nature of talk about the poor as a single class, but as poverty (in two articles in the British Journal of human beings with certain (structural) Sociology ) and, with Brian Abel-Smith, characteristics we can identify and overcome. provided empirical proof that poverty had not It sounds so obvious and simple, but I think it been abolished. He had already produced two was one of his great contributions. Of course, seminal works on the elderly and their care – he wrote about the circumstances of the each the Family Life of Old People and The Last of these types of people with great sensitivity Refuge . He had proposed the introduction of and authority. sheltered housing and attendance allowance, polices which the government subsequently Peter was intensely humane, and combined adopted and which have improved the lives of both personal and political commitment. He millions of elderly people. was heavily engaged in politics, and in CPAG and the Disability Alliance. He wrote beautifully By 40 years ago, he had successfully argued and evocatively, and without the jargon and for the establishment of the General obfuscation that has made so much sociology Household Survey, the most widely used hilarious and economics incomprehensible. survey in social science, and developed the What made Peter’s contribution so Poverty in the UK survey, arguably the single extraordinary is the fact that he was very young most important poverty survey in history.