(V, ·) Be a Banach Space. Show That There

(V, ·) Be a Banach Space. Show That There

Math541, Spring 2013, Homework #6 Solution Due to Friday, April 12, 2013 # 1. Let (V; k·k) be a Banach space. Show that there exists a compact topological space X and there exists an isometric inclusion ι :(V; k · k) ! (C(X); k · k1): This shows that every Banach space can be identified with a norm closed subspace of some C(X) space. Proof: Let us first recall that we can define the weak* topology on the dual space ∗ − V , and by Banach-Alaoglu theorem that the closed unit ball X = BV ∗ (0; 1) of V ∗ is compact with respect to the weak* topology on V ∗. Let us consider this compact topological space (X; τw∗ ). Next, we consider the canonical isometric inclusion ^ : x 2 V ! x^ 2 V ∗∗, where we definex ^(f) = f(x) for all f 2 V ∗. According to the definition of weak* topology on V ∗, for every x 2 V ,x ^ is a weak* continuous linear functional on V ∗, and thus the restriction ofx ^ to X, which is still denoted byx ^, is a continuous function on X (with respect to the weak* topology). This defines a map ι : x 2 V ! x^ 2 (C(X); k · k1): It is clear that this is a well-defined linear map, and it is an isometry injection by the Hahn-Banach extension theorem. # 2. Find all extreme points of the closed unit ball of C([0; 1]) = ff : [0; 1] ! R; continuous functionsg: Proof: Let K be the closed unit ball of C([0; 1]). It is easy to see that the constant function 1 and −1 are extreme points of K. Indeed, if there exist continuous functions f; g : [0; 1] ! [−1; 1] in K and 0 < α < 1 such that 1 = αf(x) + (1 − α)g(x) for all x 2 [0; 1], we must have f = 1 = g. Now let f be an extreme point of K. We must have kfk1 = supfjf(x)j : x 2 [0; 1]g = 1 and thus there exists a point c 2 [0; 1] such that jf(c)j = 1. If f(c) = 1, we claim that f(x) = 1 for all x 2 [0; 1]. Suppose not. We can find a point x0 2 (0; 1) such that 0 < f(x0) < 1. Let " = 1 − f(x0) > 0. By the continuity, there exists a sufficiently small δ > 0 such that (x0 − δ; x0 + δ) ⊆ (0; 1) and " " 1 − < f(x) < 1 + 2 2 for all x 2 (x0 − δ; x0 + δ). Now it is known from Urysohn's lemma, there exists a continuous function h : [0; 1] ! [0; 1] such that h(x0) = 1 and h(x) = 0 for all " x2 = (x0 − δ; x0 + δ). In this case, we can get two distinct functions f1 = f + 2 h " 1 1 and f2 = f − 2 h in K such that f = 2 f1 + 2 f2. This contradicts to f to be an extreme point of K. Therefore, if f(c) = 1, we must have f = 1. Similarly, we can prove that if f(c) = −1 for some c 2 [0; 1], we must have f = −1. These are the only extreme points of K. 1 2 # 3. Show that 1. there exists no extreme point in the closed unit ball of L1([0; 1]), 2. L1([0; 1]) is not a dual Banach space. Proof of Part 1: Let K be the closed unit ball of L1([0; 1]) and let f be an arbitrary R function in K with kfk1 = [0;1] jf(x)jdx = 1. By the (absolute) continuity of R R 1 F (t) = [0;t] jf(x)jdx, we can find c 2 [0; 1] such that F (c) = [0;c] jf(x)jdx = 2 . We can consider the distinct integrable functions g(x) = 2f(x)χ[0;c] and h(x) = 1 2f(x)χ[c;1]. It is easy to see that kgk1 = khk1 = 1 and f = 2 (g + h). This shows that any function in the closed unit ball K can not be an extreme point. Therefore, K has no extreme point at all. Proof of Part 2: Since the closed unit ball of a dual Banach space is compact with respect to the weak* topology, it must contain some extreme points by the Krein-Milman theorem. Since the closed unit ball of L1([0; 1]) has no extreme point, L1([0; 1]) can not be a dual Banach space. # 4. Let (X; τ) be a compact topological space. It is known from the Riesz representation theorem that we have the isometric isomorphism M(X) = C(X)∗, where M(X) denotes the sapce of all real valued Radon measures on X. Therefore, we obtain the weak* topology on M(X) under the representation Z µ(f) = f(x)dµ(x): X 1. Show that the set P (X) of all positive Radon measures of norm 1 (i.e. all Radon probability measures) on X is a weak* closed convex subset of M(X). 2. Show that the extreme points of P (X) are exactly Dirac measures δx with x 2 X. 3. The map D : x 2 X ! δx 2 Ext(P (X)) is a homeomorphism from topo- logical space (X; τ) onto the topological space (Ext(P (X)); τw∗ ). Proof of Part 1: Let fµαg be a net of positive Radon measure in P (X) such that µα ! µ 2 M(X) in weak* topology. We have Z Z fdµ = lim fdµα ≥ 0 X α X for all positive functions f in C(X). This shows that µ is a positive Radon measure. Since µα(X) = kµαk = 1 for all index α, we have Z Z µ(X) = 1dµ = lim 1dµα = lim µα(X) = 1: X α X α This shows that µ is a positive Radon measure with kµk = µ(X) = 1. Therefore P (X) is a weak* closed subset of M(X). Proof of Part 2: Let us fix a point x 2 X and let δx be the Dirac measure at x. Then δx is a Radon measure on X. Suppose µ = αµ1 +(1−α)µ2 for some 1 < α < 1 1 and probability Radon measures µ1 and µ2 in P (X). Since for arbitrary open set O with x2 = O, we have µ(O) = 0, this implies that µi(O) = 0 and thus µi = δx for i = 1; 2. This shows that δx is an extreme point in P (X) 3 Now we want to show that if µ is an extreme point of P (X), it must be a Dirac measure µ = δx for some point x. Suppose not. Then there exist two distinct points x and y in the support of µ, i.e. there exist two disjoint open sets x 2 U and y 2 V such that µ(U) > 0 and µ(V ) > 0. In this case, we have 0 < α = µ(U) < 1, µjU µjUc and µ1 = α and µ2 = (1−α) are positive Radon measures on X (see Homework 3, #1) with kµik = µi(X) = 1. It is easy to see that µ = αµ1 + (1 − α)µ2 is a convex combination of µ1 and µ2. Therefore, µ is not an extreme point, a contradiction. Proof of Part 3: It is known from the above discussion that D : x 2 X ! δx 2 Ext(P (X)) is a well-defined bijection. If a net xα ! x in X, then for every continuous function f 2 C(X), we have δxα (f) = f(xα) ! f(x) = δx(f): This shows that the map D is continuous from X onto Ext(P (X)). To show D−1 is continuous, we notice that for every closed subset F of X, F is compact and thus D(F ) is compact, and thus closed. It follows that if O is an open subset in X, then D(O) is open in Ext(P (X)). This implies that D−1 is also continuous. Therefore, D is a homeomorphism from X onto Ext(P (X))..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us