Implementation Masterplan Version 1

Implementation Masterplan Version 1

IMPLEMENTATION MASTERPLAN VERSION 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document for Phase 1 / Situational Assessment NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Emthanjeni LM WSA March 2018 Produced for: Water Services: Planning & Information Note: Developed from DWS Geodatabase for roll out to WSA's to complete data gaps Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Acknowledgements Directorate: Water Services Macro Planning Mr S Marais (National Coordinator) Purpose of this document is to pave a process to enable achievement toward a 90% reliable supply of water and sanitation services. The process is divided in 4 phases: PHASE 1 To provide a comprehensive base line assessment of water services delivery at WSA level. Problems were identified, possible solutions determined and monitoring procedures and structures implemented. PHASE 2 Establish of 5 Reliability Category Working groups in each DM related to: 1. Functionality Solutions 2. Water Security 3. New Infrastructure Solutions 4. Funding Models 5. Governance PHASE 3 Project Implementation PHASE 4 Monitoring and updating of reliability status The aim of the process is to produce a document per WSA, to integrate all problems, streamline solutions and monitor progress on water services delivery. Also to create one informed system that all sectors can use as a planning and reporting structure WATER SUPPLY PROGRAMMES ■ 2019 MTSF Reporting ■ Outcome 9 Reporting ■ Back to Basics Programme ■ MIG ■ WSIG ■ RBIG ■ COGTA ■ Presidential M&E Unit Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Index PROCESS TOPIC PAGE NR TOPIC PAGE NR FLOW Information Pages 3 4 EXISTING NEEDS / PROJECTS MATRIX SUMMARY STEP 1 GENERAL ORIENTATION 1 4.1 Water Summary 28 1.1 Demographics 01, 02 4.2 Sanitation Summary 29 1.2 Population Distribution 03 4 5 RELIABILITY INDEX CALCULATION 1.3 Groundwater 04 1.4 Surface Water 05 5.1 Water & Sanitation Calculation 30 2 SITUTATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW 5.2 MuSSA Graph 31 5.3 Water & Sanitation Graphs 32 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 5 6 BACKLOG ERADICATION SOLUTION (EXISTING PROJECTS STATUS SUMMARY) 2.1.1 Operation & Maintenance 2.1.1.1 Water O&M (Local & Scheme Based) 06 6.1 Physical Infrastructure Solution 33 2.1.1.2 Sanitation O&M (Local & Scheme Based) 07 INFO 7 PROJECT DETAIL 34 - 2.1.2 Refurbishment PAGES 2.1.2.1 Water Refurbished & Recover (Local & Scheme Based Solution) 08 2.1.2.2 Sanitation Refurbished & Recover (Local Solution - Dry Sanitation) 09 2.1.2.3 Sanitation Refurbished & Recover (Scheme Based - Wet Sanitation) 10 2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1.3.1 Water Scheme Based Life Span Reached 11 2.1.3.2 Water Component Based Incident Matrix 12 2.1.3.3 Sanitation Scheme Based Life Span Reached 13 2.1.3.4 Sanitation Component Based Incident Matrix 14 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH REGARDS TO: 2.1 WATER SECURITY 1. Water Services Planning 2.2.1 Blue Drop Status 2. Mangement Skill Level (Technical) 2.2.1.1 Service Quality - Blue Drop 15 3. Staff Skill Levels (Technical) 2.2.2 Green Drop Status 4. Technical Staff Capacity (Numbers) 2.2.2.1 Water Services - Green Drop 16 5. Water Resource Management (WRM) 2.2.3 Source Requirements 6. Water Conservation & Water Demang Management (WC/WDM) 2.2.3.1 Resource Needs (Local & Scheme Based Solution) 17 7. Drinking Water Safety & Regulatory Compliance 2.2.3.2 Conservation & Demand Management Table 18 8. Basic Sanitation 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 9. Wastewater/Environmental Safety & Regulatory Compliance 2.3.1 Unserved (None) 10. Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM) 2.3.1.1 Water Unserved (Local & Scheme Based Solution) 19 11. Operation & Maintenance of Assets 2.3.1.2 Sanitation Unserved (Dry & Wet Sanitation) 20 12. Financial Management 2.3.2 Under Served 13. Revenue Collection 2.3.2.1 Water Under Served 21 14. Financial Asset Management 2.3.2.2 Sanitation Under Served - Dry Sanitation 22 15. Information Management (IT) 16. Organisational Performance Monitoring 2.3.2.3 Sanitation Under Served - Wet Sanitation 23 17. Water and Sanitation Service Quality 3 GOVERNANCE 2 18. Custormer Care (CRM) 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional) 24, 25 3.2 Financial 3.2.1 Water Services Financial Diagram 26 3.2.2 Cost to Ensure Existing Reliable Services 27 Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Information Page (1) Water Supply Goal (obligation) We have to ensure that all people (universal) in South Africa have access to reliable, sustainable, safe and affordable water services Cabinet (July 2014): Focus on: – Ensure 90% reliable services by 2019 • Ensure: make sure we succeed • SDG & NDP : • Universal, reliable, sustainable, – 100% access to sustainable services by 2030 safe, and affordable • Original target = 100% coverage by 2008/2014 (not achieved) • Service Backlog Eradication Measures: Defining the water Supply Service Target and Challenge ‘90% reliable services by 2019’ WATER SANITATION 100% 100% Total Target 90% Total Target 90% 90% 90% Reliability Reliability 80% 80% Status Status 70% 70% Benchmark Benchmark 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 2011 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2011 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Censu DWS Censu DWS s s Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Information Page (2) Understanding the Target and Outcome • Focus is on sustainable and reliable services • Reliable Not= access to infrastructure or operational service (working but not necessarily providing a good service e.g. might experience interruptions) • Services means the Total Water Services Business and not only Infrastructure related solutions Water Services Business Elements that constitutes the Total Water Services Development Planning Framework Backlog Eradication & Reliability Index Process Flow Solution Definition Categories Backlog Consensus / Interpretation Backlog Eradication Solutions (Projects ) 1 Un-served (100% coverage) 2 Underserved 3 Refurbish, recover, replace Technical Solutions 4 Aged infrastructure 5 Operations and maintenance Reliability Index Calculation 6 New infrastructure Effecting Contributing impact % Factor Factors related to 7 Water Security/protection Households Strategic / 8 Service quality Institutional Interpretation Solutions 9 improved water governance 10 Environmental management % Reliability 11 Sustainable services & management 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION 1.1 Demographics 1 GENERAL OVERVIEW SETTLEMENT TYPES (2016) WSA = Emthanjeni LM Settlement Type Settlements Households Population Urban Centres: Metropolitan Area 0 0 0 Britstown Urban - Formal Town 3 9 891 40 105 De Aar Urban - Former Township 0 0 0 Hanover Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 0 0 0 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 0 0 0 Rural Scattered 0 0 0 Rural Scattered Dense 0 0 0 2 WSA POPULATION DISTRIBUTION Rural Scattered Low Density 0 0 0 Total Population 2016: 40 823 Rural Scattered Very Low Density 0 0 0 Total Number of Households 2016: 10 070 Farming (People living on farms) 0 0 0 Average Household Size: 4.05 Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 3 179 718 Total Area: ha 1 355 420 Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 0 0 0 Population Density: people per ha 0.03 Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. 0 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 TOTAL 6 10 070 40 823 3 STATS SA POPULATION COMPOSITION Population Group Distribution Metropolitan Area Settlements Population Group % of Total Population 100.00 Urban - Formal Town Black/African 33.21 Urban - Former Township 80.00 50% Coloured 57.68 Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 50% Indian/Asian 0.57 60.00 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 White 7.98 Rural Scattered 40.00 Other 0.56 Rural Scattered Dense 20.00 Rural Scattered Low Density Rural Scattered Very Low Density 0.00 Farming (People living on farms) Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Black/African Coloured Indian/Asian White Other Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. Unknown 4 SETTLEMENT TYPE DISTRIBUTION Metropolitan Area Population MAIN TYPES: URBAN / RURAL (2016) Urban - Formal Town 2% WSA Main Type Settlements Households Population Urban - Former Township Emthanjeni LM Rural 0 0 0 Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 Emthanjeni LM Urban 6 10 070 40 823 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 Rural Scattered Settlements Population Rural Scattered Dense Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Scattered Low Density 0% 0% Rural Scattered Very Low Density Farming (People living on farms) Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 98% Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. 100 100 01 % % Unknown 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION 1.1 Demographics LOCALITY MAP John Taolo Gaetsewe Siyathemba Thembelihle Local Municipality Z F Mgcawu Frances Local Municipality Baard Pixley ka Seme Namakwa Northern Cape Renosterberg Local Municipality Settlement Types Pixley ka Seme Metropolitan Area Emthanjeni Local Municipality Formal Town Former Township Working Towns & Service Centres Kareeberg (Mines, Prisons etc.) Local Municipality Informal Settlements Squatter Camp (Urban & Rural) BRITSTOWN BRITSTOWN INFORMAL A BRITSTOWN INFORMAL C Rural - Dense Village BRITSTOWN INFORMAL B DE AAR (Population > 5000) Rural - Small Village (Population <= 5000) Umsobomvu Local Municipality Rural Scattered - Dense - Low Density - Very Low Density Farming Ubuntu Local Municipality HANOVER BASE

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    62 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us