Lectures 8-9: Multi-Electron Atoms Energy Levels in Alkali Metals

Lectures 8-9: Multi-Electron Atoms Energy Levels in Alkali Metals

Lectures 8-9: Multi-electron atoms Energy levels in alkali metals o Alkali atoms: in ground state, contain a set of Z - 1 completely filled subshells with a single valence electron in the next s subshell. o Alkali atom spectra o Electrons in p subshells are not excited in any low-energy processes. s electron is the single optically active electron and core of filled subshells can be ignored. o Central field approximation o Shell model o Effective potentials and screening o Experimental evidence for shell model PY3004 PY3004 Energy levels in alkali metals Hartree theory o In alkali atoms, the l degeneracy is lifted: states with the same principal quantum number n o For multi-electron atom, must consider Coulomb interactions between its Z electrons and its and different orbital quantum number l have different energies. nucleus of charge +Ze. Largest effects due to large nuclear charge. o Relative to H atom, alkali terms lie at lower energies due to increased Coulomb attraction of o Must also consider Coulomb interactions between each electron and all other electrons in nucleus. This shift increases the smaller l is. atom. Effect is weak. o For larger values of n, i.e., greater orbital radii, the terms are only slightly different from o Assume electrons are moving independently in a spherically symmetric net potential. hydrogen. o The net potential is the sum of the spherically symmetric attractive Coulomb potential due to o Also, electrons with small l are more strongly bound and their terms lie at lower energies. the nucleus and a spherically symmetric repulsive Coulomb potential which represents the average effect of the electrons and its Z - 1 colleagues. o These effects become stronger with increasing Z. o Hartree (1928) attempted to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation for Z electrons o Non-Coulombic potential breaks degeneracy of levels with the same principal quantum in a net potential. number. o Total potential of the atom can be written as the sum of a set of Z identical net potentials V( r), each depending on r of the electron only. PY3004 PY3004 Screening Central field approximation o Hartree theory results in a shell model of atomic structure, -e which includes the concept of screening. o The Hamiltonian for an N-electron atom with nuclear charge +Ze can be written: r o For example, alkali atom can be modelled as having a valence +Ze electron at a large distance from nucleus. -(Z-1)e o Moves in an electrostatic field of nucleus +Ze which is where N = Z for a neutral atom. First summation accounts for kinetic energy of electrons , screened by the (Z-1) inner electrons. This is described by the second their Coulomb interaction with the nuclues, third accounts for electron-electron effective potential Veff( r ). repulsion. o At r small, o Not possible to find exact solution to Schrodinger equation using this Hamiltonian. o Unscreened nuclear Coulomb potential. o Must use the central field approximation in which we write the Hamiltonian as: o At r large, o Nuclear charge is screened to one unit of charge. where Vcentral is the central field and Vresidual is the residual electrostatic interaction. PY3004 PY3004 Central field approximation Central field approximation o As potentials only depend on radial coordinate, can use separation of variables: o The central field approximation work in the limit where where Ri(ri) are a set of radial wave functions and Yi(!i, "i ) are a set of spherical harmonic functions. o In this case, Vresidual can be treated as a perturbation and solved later. o Following the same procedure as Lectures 3-4, we end up with three equations, one for each " =" (rˆ )" (rˆ ) " (rˆ ) polar coordinate. o By writing 1 1 2 2 K N N we end up with N separate Schrödinger equations: o Each electron will therefore have four quantum numbers: ! o l and ml: result from angular equations. with E = E + E + … + E o n: arises from solving radial equation. n and l determine the radial wave function Rnl(r ) 1 2 N and the energy of the electron. o m : Electron can either have sip up (m = +1/2) or down (m = -1/2). o Normally solved numerically, but analytic solutions can be found using the separation of s s s variables technique. o State of multi-electron atom is then found by working out the wave functions of the individual electrons and then finding the total energy of the atom (E = E1 + E2 + … + EN). PY3004 PY3004 Shell model Shell model o Periodic table can be built up using this shell-filling process. Electronic configuration of first o Hartree theory predicts shell model structure, which only considers gross structure: 11 elements is listed below: 1. States are specified by four quantum numbers, n, l, ml and ms. 2. Gross structure of spectrum is determined by n and l. 3. Each (n,l) term of the gross structure contains 2(2l + 1) degenerate levels. o Shell model assumes that we can order energies of gross terms in a multielectron atom according to n and l. As electrons are added, electrons fill up the lowest available shell first. o Experimental evidence for shell model proves that central approximation is appropriate. o Must apply 1. Pauli exclusion principle: Only two electrons with opposite spin can occupy an atomic orbital. i.e., no two electrons have the same four quantum numbers. 2. Hunds rule: Electrons fill each orbital in the subshell before pairing up with opposite spins. PY3004 PY3004 Shell model Shell model o Atomic shells listed in order of increasing energy. Nshell = 2(2l + 1) is the number of electrons o 4s level has lower energy than 3d level due to penetration. that can fill a shell due to the degeneracy of the ml and ms levels. Naccum is the accumulated number of electrons that can be held by atom. o Electron in 3s orbital has a probability of being found close to nucleus. Therefore experiences unshielded potential of nucleus and is more tightly bound. 3d 4s o Note, 19th electron occupies 4s shell rather than 3d shell. Same for 37th. Happens because energy of shell with large l may be higher than shell with higher n and lower l. PY3004 PY3004 Shell model Shell model Radial probabilities for 1s 2s 3s Radial probabilities for 3s 3p 3d 3s - red 1s - red 3p - blue 2s - blue 3d - green 3s - green PY3004 PY3004 Quantum defect Quantum defect o Alkalis are approximately one-electron atoms: filled o #(l) depends mainly on l. Values for sodium are inner shells and one valence electron. shown at right. 2 2 6 1 o Consider sodium atom: 1s 2s 2p 3s . o Can therefore estimate wavelength of a transition via o Optical spectra are determined by outermost 3s electron. The energy of each (n, l) term of the valence electron is o For sodium the D lines are 3p ! 3s transitions. Using values for #(l) from table, where #(l) is the quantum defect - allows for penetration of the inner shells by the valence electron. o Shaded region in figure near r = 0 represent the inner n = 1 and n = 2 shells. 3s and 3p penetrate the inner shells. o Much larger penetration for 3s => electron sees large => $ = 589 nm nuclear potential => lower energy. PY3004 PY3004 Shell model justification Experimental evidence for shell model o Consider sodium, which has 11 electrons. o Ionisation potentials and atomic radii: o Nucleus has a charge of +11e with 11 electrons o Ionisation potentials of noble gas elements are orbiting about it. highest within a particular period of periodic table, while those of the alkali are lowest. o From Bohr model, radii and energies of the electrons o Ionisation potential gradually increases until in their shells are n 2 13.6Z 2 shell is filled and then drops. r = a and E = " n Z 0 n n 2 o Filled shells are most stable and valence o First two electrons occupy n =1 shell. These electrons electrons occupy larger, less tightly bound orbits. 2 see full charge of +11e. => r1 = 1 /11 a0 = 0.05 Å and ! 2 2 ! E1 = -13.6 x 11 /1 ~ -1650 eV. o Noble gas atoms require large amount of energy to liberate their outermost electrons, whereas outer shell electrons of alkali metals can be o Next two electrons experience screened potential by easily liberated. 2 two electrons in n = 1 shell. Zeff =+9e => r2 = 2 /9 a0 2 2 = 0.24 Å and E2 = -13.6 x 9 /2 = -275 eV. PY3004 PY3004 Experimental evidence Experimental evidence for shell model for shell model o X-ray spectra: o Wavelength of various series of emission lines are found to obey Moseley’s law. o Enables energies of inner shells to be o For example, the K-shell lines are given by determined. o Accelerated electrons used to eject core electrons 80 keV where % accounts for the screening effect of other electrons. from inner shells. X-ray photon emitted by electrons from higher shell filling lower shell. 40 keV o Similarly, the L-shell spectra obey: o K-shell (n = 1), L-shell (n = 2), etc. Wavelength (A) o Emission lines are caused by radiative transitions after the electron beam ejects an inner shell o Same wavelength as predicted by Bohr, but now have electron. Continuum due to bremsstrahlung. and effective charge (Z - %) instead of Z. o Higher electron energies excite inner shell o %L ~ 10 and %K ~ 3. transitions. PY3004 PY3004 Experimental evidence for shell model o Assume net charge is ( Z - 1 )e.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us