The Interaction of Ferredoxin-Linked Sulfite Reductase with Ferredoxin

The Interaction of Ferredoxin-Linked Sulfite Reductase with Ferredoxin

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Volume 221, number 2, 343-348 FEB 05097 September 1987 The interaction of ferredoxin-linked sulfite reductase with ferredoxin Masakazu Hirasawa, J. Milton Boyer, Kevin A. Gray, Danny J. Davis* and David B. Knaff Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-4260 and *Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA Received 22 June 1987; revised version received 21 July 1987 Spinach sulfite reductase has been shown to co-migrate during gel filtration chromatography at low ionic strength with spinach ferredoxin. No co-migration was observed at high ionic strength. These results indic- ate that the two proteins form a high-affinity, electrostatically stabilized complex, as had previously been demonstrated for three other ferredoxin-dependent, plant enzymes. Modification of 3-4 ferredoxin carboxyl groups had little detectable effect on the ferredoxin-sulfite reductase interaction. Sulfite-reductase; Ferredoxin; (Spinach) 1. INTRODUCTION synthase (EC 1.4.7.1). Chemical modification [12,13], cross-linking [10,13,14] and NMR studies A key step in sulfate assimilation by higher [ 151 have implicated carboxyl groups on ferredoxin plants [l] is the six-electron reduction of sulfite to as supplying the negative charges involved in form- sulfide, catalyzed by the enzyme ferredoxin : sulfite ing these complexes. As ferredoxin-dependent oxidoreductase (EC 1.8.7.1, hereafter referred to spinach sulfite reductase can be purified using a as sulfite reductase). Sulfite reductase, located in ferredoxin-Sepharose 4B affinity column [3], it ap- the chloroplast [2], has been purified to peared likely that sulfite reductase, like the other homogeneity from spinach leaves [3-51. The en- plant enzymes listed above, can form an elec- zyme, which contains one siroheme and one trostatic complex with ferredoxin. Evidence for [4Fe-4S] cluster as prosthetic groups [3-51, can such complex formation is presented below. utilize reduced methyl viologen as an electron donor [3,4] but the physiological electron donor is 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS reduced ferredoxin [3,4]. Considerable evidence exists [6-l l] that fer- Spinach ferredoxin (,4422nm:A277nm= 0.45) was redoxin forms electrostatically stabilized com- prepared according to Tagawa and Arnon [16]. plexes with a number of ferredoxin-dependent Ferredoxin was modified by treatment with glycine plant enzymes, including ferredoxin : NADP+ ox- ethyl ester in the presence of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl- idoreductase (EC 1.18.1.2, hereafter referred to as aminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) according to NADP+ reductase), ferredoxin : nitrite oxidoreduc- Vieira and Davis [12]. Sulfite reductase was tase (EC 1.7.7.1, hereafter referred to as nitrite purified by a modification of the procedure of reductase) and ferredoxin-dependent glutamate Aketagawa and Tamura [3]. An isolation buffer consisting of 100 mM Tris-HzS04 (pH 7.9, Correspondence address: D.B. Knaff, Department ot 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM Na2S03, 1 mM EDTA and Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride replaced that Lubbock, TX 79409-4260, USA used previously. Acetone precipitation and anion- Published by Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (Biomedical Division) 00145793/87/$3._50 0 1987 Federation of European Biochemical Societies 343 Volume 221, number 2 FEB.5 LETTERS September 1987 exchange chromatography were carried out as in redoxin was omitted from the reaction mixture, [3] except that the O-50% acetone precipitate, rates of sulfite and enzyme-dependent oxidation of after re-dissolving in buffer, was concentrated by reduced methyl viologen approx. 15% of those ob- precipitation with 70% saturated ammonium tained with the complete reaction mixture were sulfate and dialyzed prior to chromatography on a observed. Whatman DE-52 DEAE cellulose column that had Absorbance spectra were obtained using an been equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HzSO4 buffer Aminco DW-2a spectrophotometer and CD spec- (pH 7.5) containing 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA tra were obtained using a Jasco J-20 spec- and 20% (v/v) glycerol. Active fractions were tropolarimeter . Oxidation-reduction titrations pooled, concentrated by precipitation with 70% were performed electrochemically using the op- saturated ammonium sulfate and, after dialyses, tically transparent gold electrode/thin-layer cell applied to an Ultrogel AcA 34 gel filtration column system in [17]. Protein concentration was deter- that had been equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HzS04 mined according to Bradford [ 181, using bovine buffer (pH 7.5) containing 200 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM serum albumin as a standard. Ferredoxin concen- EDTA and 20% glycerol. Active fractions were trations were determined using 6422”rn = 9.7 X pooled, concentrated by ammonium sulfate pre- lo3 M-’ *cm-’ [16]. Sulfite reductase concentra- cipitation, dialyzed against 10 mM potassium tion was calculated from protein concentration, phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 140 g/l of assuming a molecular mass of 138 kDa [4]. ammonium sulfate, applied to a phenyl-Sepharose CL4B column equilibrated with the same buffer and eluted as described by Krueger and Siegel [4]. 3. RESULTS Fractions containing sulfite reductase with specific Since the purification protocol used to obtain activity > 2.0 U/mg protein (see below) were pool- the spinach sulfite reductase for the experiments to ed, concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipita- be described below differed somewhat from those tion, dialyzed against 10 mM potassium phosphate reported previously [3,4], it seemed appropriate to buffer (pH 7.7) containing 10% glycerol and ap- compare some of the preparation’s kinetic proper- plied to a ferredoxin-Sepharose 4B affinity column ties with literature values [3,4]. The enzyme obeyed [3] equilibrated with the same buffer. After Michaelis-Menten kinetics with respect to the con- washing the column with the equilibration buffer centration of the electron donor. K,,, values of 25 to remove undesired protein, sulfite reductase was and 6 PM were obtained for reduced ferredoxin eluted with 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer and reduced methyl viologen, respectively. When (pH 7.7). Fractions containing high specific activi- the enzyme was assayed (using reduced ferredoxin ty were pooled and concentrated by membrane as the electron donor) at varying sulfite concentra- filtration using an Amicon PM-10 membrane. The tions, a sigmoidal relationship between rate and final enzyme preparation had a ratio of sulfite concentration similar to that reported by A3s5,,,,,:A280,,,,, of 0.20 and a specific activity of Aketagawa and Tamura [3] was observed. Half- 5.3 U/mg protein with reduced ferredoxin as the maximal velocity was observed at 120pM sulfite electron donor. and a Hill coefficient [ 191 of 2.1 (calculated by fit- Sulfite reductase was assayed by monitoring the ting the kinetic data using a linear least-squares absorbance decrease at 604 nm due to the oxida- regression program - GRAPH, Version 1 from tion of reduced methyl viologen, using a modifica- Cricket Software - on a Macintosh Plus computer) tion of the procedure of Aketagawa and Tamura was calculated. The visible absorbance’ spectrum [3]. The reaction mixture (under an Nz atmosphere (not shown) and apparent molecular mass, deter- in a Thunberg cuvette) contained, in a total volume mined by gel filtration (see below), were essentially of 2.5 ml, 100,~mol Tris-H2SOd buffer (pH 8.0), identical to those reported in [3,4]. 3 mg bovine serum albumin, 40 nmol ferredoxin, The observation that spinach sulfite reductase 5 pmol Na2S03, 5 rmol Zn-reduced methyl can be purified using a ferredoxin-Sepharose 4B viologen and enzyme. 1 unit of activity was defined affinity column [3] strongly suggested that fer- as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the oxidation redoxin forms a complex with the enzyme. Addi- of 1 pmol reduced methyl viologen per min. If fer- tional evidence for complex formation comes from 344 Volume 221, number 2 FEBS LETTERS September 1987 I Ferredoxin 1.0- \ la- 0 1.7- \ 0 oIsultlt.Reductme Z ‘0 ; Sutttte Reducbise . Natlva Ferredoxin 1.6- Sutttte Reducta~ - Modltied Femdoxin t 10’ 105 Fig. 1. Gel filtration chromatography of ferredoxin plus Log Molecutar Weight sulfite reductase. Chromatography was performed on an Fig.2. Apparent i14~ values of ferredoxin-sulfite Ultrogel AcA 34 column (1 x 30 cm). (A) Elution in reductase complexes. Chromatography was performed 30 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). (A---A) Data for as described in fig.lA. M, standards used bovine carboxyl-modified ferredoxin plus sulfite reductase; (0): (M) data for unmodified, native ferredoxin plus serum albumin (Mr = 66000); hexokinase (Mr = sulfite reductase. (B) Elution in 30 mM Tris-HCl buffer 110000); alcohol dehydrogenase (Mr = 150000) and (pH 8.0) containing 200 mM NaCl. The data were bovine liver catalase (Mr = 240000). obtained from an experiment with sulfite reductase plus unmodified, native ferredoxin. the observation (not shown) that when sulfite apparent molecular mass for the ferredoxin-sulfite reductase was added to a ferredoxin-saturated reductase complex (fig.2) was 160 + 6 kDa (deter- DEAE-cellulose column, ferredoxin and sulfite mined according to Andrews [20]). No protein was reductase were co-eluted when 20 mM Tris-HCl detected in fractions corresponding to molecular buffer (pH 8.0) containing 80 mM NaCl was ap- masses near

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us