Comparative Microbiome Analysis of Three Species of Laboratory-Reared Periplaneta Cockroaches

Comparative Microbiome Analysis of Three Species of Laboratory-Reared Periplaneta Cockroaches

ISSN (Print) 0023-4001 ISSN (Online) 1738-0006 Korean J Parasitol Vol. 58, No. 5: 537-542, October 2020 ▣ ORIGINAL ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2020.58.5.537 Comparative Microbiome Analysis of Three Species of Laboratory-Reared Periplaneta Cockroaches Seogwon Lee1, Ju Yeong Kim1, Myung-hee Yi1, In-Yong Lee1, Won-Ja Lee1 Hye Su Moon2, Dongeun Yong2, 1, Tai-Soon Yong * 1Department of Environmental Medical Biology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Arthropods of Medical Importance Resource Bank, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; 2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea Abstract: Cockroaches inhabit various habitats, which will influence their microbiome. Although the microbiome can be influenced by the diet and environmental factors, it can also differ between species. Therefore, we conducted 16S rDNA- targeted high-throughput sequencing to evaluate the overall bacterial composition of the microbiomes of 3 cockroach species, Periplaneta americana, P. japonica, and P. fuliginosa, raised in laboratory for several generations under the same conditions. The experiments were conducted using male adult cockroaches. The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was not significantly different among the 3 species. With regard to the Shannon and Pielou indexes, higher micro- biome values were noted in P. americana than in P. japonica and P. fuliginosa. Microbiome composition was also evaluat- ed, with endosymbionts accounting for over half of all OTUs in P. japonica and P. fuliginosa. Beta diversity analysis further showed that P. japonica and P. fuliginosa had similar microbiome composition, which differed from that of P. americana. However, we also identified that P. japonica and P. fuliginosa host distinct OTUs. Thus, although microbiome composi- tions may vary based on multiple conditions, it is possible to identify distinct microbiome compositions among different Periplaneta cockroach species, even when the individuals are reared under the same conditions. Key words: Cockroach, metabarcoding, microbiota, diet, environment INTRODUCTION tors [3]. Forty-seven species are included in the genus Periplaneta [4], Insect microbiomes affect the nutrient cycling, provide pro- and we maintain 3 species of the genus Periplaneta in our labo- tection from parasites and pathogens, and modulate immune ratory, i.e., P. americana, P. japonica, and P. fuliginosa. P. ameri- responses. Cockroach microbiomes consist of horizontally cana originated in Africa and is very common worldwide [4]. transmitted microbes and vertically transmitted symbionts. This species measures approximately 4 cm in length [7] and is The diversity of these microbiomes can vary depending on de- often found in commercial buildings [5]. Periplaneta fuliginosa velopmental stage, diet, and rearing practices [1]. In a recent is another species of African origin and measures 3 cm in study, laboratory-reared and field-collected Blattella germanica length. This species is widely distributed across the southeast- presented distinct microbiomes, although they shared the ern United States and Japan [6]. Periplaneta japonica, which same core bacterial taxa, which appear to differ depending on measures 2.5 cm in length, originated in the Japan and is the location and diet [2]. However, no significant microbiome freeze tolerant [7]. differences resulting from changes in diet have been observed As the features of each species differ within the genus Peri- in Periplaneta americana, although this species has been found planeta, we expected that there would also be differences to present microbiome differences due to environmental fac- among Periplaneta microbiomes. Hence, we conducted a study to establish a microbiome that minimized the aforementioned Received 2 June 2020, revised 26 August 2020, accepted 27 August 2020. differences, which may have been because of diet and environ- • Corresponding author ([email protected]) * mental factors. The laboratory-reared cockroaches used in this © 2020, Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine study were reared for many generations under the same labo- This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) ratory conditions to minimize the differences resulting from which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. diet and environmental factors. Then, we analyzed the cock- 537 538 Korean J Parasitol Vol. 58, No. 5: 537-542, October 2020 roach microbiomes using 16S rDNA-targeted high-throughput (5’-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGAC- sequencing to compare the 3 cockroach species. TACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’) [8,9], utilizing an Illumina MiSeq V3 cartridge (San Diego, California, USA) with 600 cy- MATERIALS AND METHODS cles. A limited-cycle amplification step was performed to add multiplexing indices and Illumina sequencing adapters. The li- Cockroach collection and rearing conditions braries were normalized, pooled, and sequenced on the Illu- Individuals of 3 species of cockroaches, P. americana, P. ja- mina MiSeq V3 cartridge platform following the manufactur- ponica, and P. fuliginosa, were collected in Yongsan, Seoul, and er’s instructions. Incheon, respectively. P. americana and P. fuliginosa individuals have been maintained in the laboratory of the Arthropods of Bioinformatics and statistics Medical Importance Bank of Yonsei University College of Bioinformatics analyses were performed following the Medicine in Seoul, Korea, since 1998, while P. japonica indi- methods described in our previous study [8]. The EzBioCloud viduals have been reared since 2017. The cockroaches used in database (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/) [8] was used for the this study were reared for many generations under the same taxonomic assignment using BLAST 2.2.22, and pairwise laboratory conditions to minimize the potential influence of alignments were generated to calculate the similarity [10,11]. environmental factors and diet. In addition, all the cockroach- All the described analyses were performed using BIOiPLUG, a es used in this study were in the adult stage. A total of 40 cock- commercially available ChunLab bioinformatics cloud plat- roaches were reared separately in a plastic box (27×34×19 form for microbiome research (https://www.bioiplug.com/) cm) maintained at 25˚C. The cockroaches were fed Purina Rat [8]. The reads were normalized to 43,000 to perform the anal- Chow (Nestle Purina PetCare, St Louis, Missouri, USA), con- yses. Determination of Shannon, phylogenetic, and Pielou in- taining crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, crude ash, calci- dexes; unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean um, and phosphorus, and were supplied tap water ad libitum. (UPGMA) clustering; principal coordinates analysis (PCoA); Male adult cockroaches (not non-reproductive), one month permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANO- after the last instar, were used. Sampling was performed 2 days VA); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); and effect size (LEfSe) after starving. analysis were performed according to the previous study [8]. DNA extraction RESULTS The surface of each cockroach was sterilized using alcohol. The cockroaches (n=6 of each species) were then frozen with The average numbers of read counts assigned to P. ameri- liquid nitrogen and individually crushed using a mortar and cana, P. japonica, and P. fuliginosa were 49,905 reads corre- pestle, and their DNA was extracted. Total DNA was extracted sponding to 897 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), 56,565 using the NucleoSpin DNA Insect Kit (Macherey-Nagel, reads corresponding to 955 OTUs, and 58,013 reads corre- Düren, Germany) following the instructions of the manufac- sponding to 878 OTUs, respectively. The rarefaction curve of turer. The DNA extracted from each sample was eluted in 20 µl all the samples formed a plateau (Supplementary Fig. S1). The of elution buffer. All processing and sequencing procedures number of OTUs was not significantly different among the 3 were conducted at a clean bench, under a sterilized hood, and cockroach species. There were no significant differences in the in a DNA-free room. DNA concentrations were quantified us- phylogenetic diversity between species, although it was higher ing an ND-1000 Nanodrop system (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, for P. americana than for P. japonica as well as P. fuliginosa. In Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The extracted DNA was stored contrast, the Pielou and Shannon index values were signifi- at −80˚C in a deep freezer. cantly higher for P. americana than for P. japonica and P. fuligi- nosa (Fig. 1, P =0.004). Next-generation sequencing UPGMA cluster analysis showed that the cockroaches were The 16S rDNA V3–V4 region was amplified by PCR using organized according to species: P. japonica and P. fuliginosa forward (5’-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGA- were clustered earlier and then joined the P. americana (Fig. CAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’) and reverse primers 2A). The results of PCoA showed that although all 3 groups Lee et al.: Microbiome analysis of Periplaneta species 539 N.S. (P= 0.337) Periplaneta americana [6] A **(P= 0.004) A **(P= 0.004) Periplaneta americana [3] Periplaneta americana [5] 0.9 Pielou Periplaneta americana [1] 0.8 High Mid Low Periplaneta americana [2] 0.7 Periplaneta americana [4] 0.6

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us