Article Phase (Chhabra Et Al., 2011)

Article Phase (Chhabra Et Al., 2011)

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10793–10808, 2016 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/10793/2016/ doi:10.5194/acp-16-10793-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Impact of molecular structure on secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbon photooxidation under low-NOx conditions Lijie Li1,2, Ping Tang1,2, Shunsuke Nakao1,2,a, and David R. Cocker III1,2 1University of California, Riverside, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Riverside, CA 92507, USA 2College of Engineering – Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), Riverside, CA 92507, USA acurrently at: Clarkson University, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA Correspondence to: David R. Cocker III ([email protected]) Received: 24 October 2015 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 15 January 2016 Revised: 13 July 2016 – Accepted: 28 July 2016 – Published: 31 August 2016 Abstract. The molecular structure of volatile organic com- 1 Introduction pounds determines their oxidation pathway, directly im- pacting secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation. This Organic aerosols are critical to human health (Dockery et al., study comprehensively investigates the impact of molecu- 1993; Krewski et al., 2003; Davidson et al., 2005), climate lar structure on SOA formation from the photooxidation of change (IPCC, 2007) and visibility (Pöschl, 2005; Seinfeld 12 different eight- to nine-carbon aromatic hydrocarbons un- and Pandis, 2006). Global anthropogenic secondary organic der low-NOx conditions. The effects of the alkyl substitute aerosol (SOA) sources are underestimated by current mod- number, location, carbon chain length and branching struc- els (Henze et al., 2008; Matsui et al., 2009; Hallquist et al., ture on the photooxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons are 2009; Farina et al., 2010) and are more likely to increase due demonstrated by analyzing SOA yield, chemical composi- to the increase of known anthropogenic emissions (Heald et tion and physical properties. Aromatic hydrocarbons, catego- al., 2008). Therefore, it is crucial to explore SOA formation rized into five groups, show a yield order of ortho (o-xylene mechanisms from anthropogenic precursors. and o-ethyltoluene) > one substitute (ethylbenzene, propy- Aromatic hydrocarbons are major anthropogenic SOA lbenzene and isopropylbenzene) > meta (m-xylene and m- precursors (Kanakidou et al., 2005; Henze et al., 2008; Der- ethyltoluene) > three substitute (trimethylbenzenes) > para went et al., 2010). C8 (ethylbenzene, xylenes) and C9 (ethyl- (p-xylene and p-ethyltoluene). SOA yields of aromatic hy- toluenes and trimethylbenzenes) aromatics are important aro- drocarbon photooxidation do not monotonically decrease matic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere besides toluene and when increasing alkyl substitute number. The ortho posi- benzene (Monod et al., 2001; Millet et al., 2005; Heald et tion promotes SOA formation while the para position sup- al., 2008; Kansal, 2009; Hu et al., 2015). The major sources presses aromatic oxidation and SOA formation. Observed of C8 and C9 aromatic hydrocarbons are fuel evaporation SOA chemical composition and volatility confirm that higher (Kaiser et al., 1992; Rubin et al., 2006; Miracolo et al., 2012), yield is associated with further oxidation. SOA chemical tailpipe exhaust (Singh et al., 1985; Monod et al., 2001; composition also suggests that aromatic oxidation increases Lough et al., 2005; Na et al., 2005; Correa and Arbilla, 2006) with increasing alkyl substitute chain length and branching and solvent use (Zhang et al., 2013). C8 aromatic hydrocar- structure. Further, carbon dilution conjecture developed by bons (ethylbenzene and xylenes (ortho, meta and para) are Li et al. (2016) is extended in this study to serve as a stan- categorized as hazardous air pollutants under the US Clean dard method to determine the extent of oxidation of an alkyl- Air Act Amendments of 1990; http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/ substituted aromatic hydrocarbon. orig189.html). Toluene and C8 aromatics dominate the an- thropogenic SOA precursors and SOA yield from all C9 aro- matics is currently predicted to be equal to that of toluene Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 10794 L. Li et al.: Impact of molecular structure on secondary organic aerosol formation (Bahreini et al., 2009). The chemical composition of aro- conditions. Moreover, previous studies mainly focused on matic SOA remains poorly understood with less than 50 % the carbon number effect on SOA formation (Lim and Zie- of aromatic hydrocarbon photooxidation products identified mann, 2009; Li et al., 2016) and seldom addressed the sub- (Forstner et al., 1997; Fisseha et al., 2004; Hamilton et al., stitute carbon length impact on VOC oxidation and hence 2005; Sato et al., 2007). Aromatic hydrocarbon photooxida- SOA formation. Different percentages of similar compounds tion mechanisms remain uncertain except for the initial step are found when the substitute carbon length on the aromatic (∼ 90 % OH-addition reaction) (Calvert et al., 2002). Hence, ring changes (Forstner et al., 1997; Huang et al., 2007, 2011). understanding the atmospheric reaction mechanisms of C8 For example, a lower percentage of 3-methyl-2,5-furanone and C9 aromatic hydrocarbons and properly quantifying their is observed in toluene than that of 3-ethyl-2,5-furanone in SOA formation potential presents unique challenges due to ethylbenzene (Forstner et al., 1997). Further, the branching the variety in their molecular structure and the electron den- structure on the aromatic substitute might impact the reac- sity of the aromatic ring. tion pathway. It is possible that fragmentation is more fa- Volatile organic compound (VOC) structure impacts the vored on branched substitute alkoxy radicals than n-alkane gas-phase reaction mechanism (Ziemman and Atkinson, substituents similar to alkanes (Atkinson and Arey, 2003). 2012) and kinetic reaction rate (eg. kOH; Atkinson, 1987), Few studies comprehensively consider the overall alkyl thereby influencing the resulting SOA properties and mass effect on SOA formation from aromatic hydrocarbons, in- yield. Molecular structure impacts on SOA formation from cluding the substitute number, position, carbon chain length alkanes have been previously studied (Lim and Ziemann, and branching structure, especially under low-NOx condi- 2009; Ziemann, 2011; Lambe et al., 2012; Tkacik et al., tions. It is valuable to understand the relationship between 2012; Yee et al., 2013; Loza et al., 2014). It is generally ob- aromatic hydrocarbon molecular structures and SOA phys- served that SOA yield decreases from cyclic alkanes to lin- ical and chemical characteristics. The effects of OH expo- ear alkanes and to branched alkanes. The relative location sure (Lambe et al., 2012, 2015), mass loading (Shilling et al., of the methyl group on the carbon chain also affects SOA 2009, α-pinene; Pfaffenberger et al., 2013, α-pinene) and NO yield (Tkacik et al., 2012). It is further found that the SOA condition (Ng et al., 2007; Eddingsaas et al., 2012, α-pinene) yield and structure relationship is influenced by CDC groups on SOA physical and chemical characteristics are previ- (Ziemann, 2011). Understanding the SOA yield and struc- ously discussed. However, few studies address the molecu- ture relationship of aromatic compounds in a similar way is lar structure effect of the precursor on SOA chemical com- necessary due to the atmospheric importance of aromatic hy- position, especially under atmospherically relevant condi- drocarbons. tions. Sato et al. (2012) show the chemical composition dif- Previously, aromatic studies categorized SOA yield solely ference between ethylbenzene, m-xylene, o-xylene, 1,2,4- based on substitute number (Odum et al., 1997a, b). How- trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene under high ab- ever, those chamber experiments were conducted at high- solute NOx conditions and hypothesize that ketones prevent NOx conditions, which are well above levels present in further oxidation during aromatic photooxidation compared the atmosphere. Song et al. (2005, 2007) found that initial with aldehydes. The SOA products detected in Sato’s study HC = NOx ratios (HC being hydrocarbon) significantly im- are mainly small volatile compounds which are less likely to pact SOA yields during aromatic photooxidation with yields partition into the particle phase (Chhabra et al., 2011). There- increasing as NOx levels decreased. Ng et al. (2007) show fore, the study of Sato et al. (2012) indicates that further there is no significant yield difference between one-substitute oxidation or oligomerization might contribute to SOA for- (toluene) and two-substitute (m-xylene) aromatics in the ab- mation during aromatic photooxidation. Less SOA charac- sence of NOx. The current work focuses on molecular struc- terization data on propylbenzene and ethyltoluene compared ture impact on SOA formation at more atmospherically rel- with trimethylbenzene are available. However, Bahreini et evant NOx and aerosol loadings. Li et al. (2016) demon- al. (2009) suggest that the sum of the propylbenzene and strated the methyl-group-number impact on SOA formation ethyltoluene is on average a factor of 4–10 more abundant under low-NOx conditions. Also, aromatic compounds with than trimethylbenzene. para-position alkyl groups have been observed to form less This work examines 12 aromatic hydrocarbons, all of SOA under various NOx conditions than their isomers in which are isomers

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us