Rob Huebert [email protected]

Rob Huebert Rhuebert@Ucalgary.Ca

ON CANADIAN SOVEREIGNTY The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Arctic Section Rob Huebert [email protected] Calgary September 21, 2016 Part I: The Big Picture • Increasing international and Canadian debate as to what the Arctic will look like in the future: physical; economic; cultural; and geopolitical • A New Arctic Security Environment is Forming on a Global Basis – What will it look like? • Arctic is increasingly being connected to rest of world • How will this impact Canada? • What does Canada need to do? Issue 3: Continental Shelf Issue 2: Beaufort Sea Issue 4: Hans Island/Lincoln Sea Issue 1: NWP Issue 5: Davis Strait Issue 1: The NWP • Canadian position – Internal Waters • US/(EU position) – Strait used for International Navigation • Issue is over Control of Trans-Polar Shipping Crystal Serenity The Geopolitical Dimension • The core US position on NWP is based on concern with precedent – Strait of Hormuz • But US knows if Northwest Passage is an International Strait there will be security outputs; also International Right of Overflights – Possible future security maritime threat – Freedom of Navigation – Existing Aerospace Threat Issue 2: Beaufort Sea • 1825 St. Petersburg Treaty – UK/Russia • Has been “managed” by Canada and US • Overlaps with numerous issues of importance outside of Arctic • Talks began between US-Canada summer 2011 • Impacts of Norway/Russia settlement Beaufort Sea Dispute Canada - US US Moratorium on Commercial Fishing of the Beaufort Sea- 2009 vs 1984 Western Arctic Claim Inuvialuit Agreement Issue 3: Extended Continental Shelf • UNCLOS article 76 – finished mid – 1970s/officially 1982 • Sovereign rights over soil and subsoil (oil and gas) • Russia 2007+; Canada 2013; Denmark 2014; US ? • Must resolve differences peacefully • Ilulissat Declaration May 2008 Maritime jurisdiction & boundaries in the Arctic www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/resources/arctic Issue 4: Hans Island and Lincoln Sea • Lincoln Sea Dispute – Technical basis – minor impact – Resolved November 28, 2012 • Hans Island – Minor impact – Does not impact maritime Boundary – But illustrates the political and public nature of disputes – Canada and Denmark have de facto division Lincoln Sea Hans Island Gunboat Diplomacy and Hans Island Issue 5: Denmark-Canada Davis Strait • 1973 Boundary Agreement – (Except Hans Islands) • Discovery of geological indicators of oil and gas Cairn Oil Search Geopolitical Impacts • If oil is discovered; and if the find is substantial; and if geological province does extend to Canadian side – what does Canada do • Newfoundland vs Nunavut vs Federal • Resource Development vs Conservation • Independent Greenland • But no oil development now Part II: The Pressure Points • Conflicting Core Russia and US Strategic Interests Increased Tension between NATO and Russia • Russian Security Policy Core Concern – Expansion of NATO to Russian Border Mid- 2000s • Georgia interest in NATO and Russian War 2008 • Ukraine interest in NATO/EU and Russian War 2014 • Growing unrest in Russian population Baltic States • Finland • Sweden Russia Core Strategic Interests and Arctic • Nuclear Stability – Maintenance of Deterrence – Focus on SSBN – Build-up Northern Fleet • Limit Expansion of NATO – Growing interest of Sweden/Finland • Stop/Limit US ABM – Will look to Alaska Growing Military Assertiveness of Russia in Arctic and renewed military strength • 1990’s Period of Extreme Reduction • 2000’s Renewal • Russian State Rearmament Program 2007-15 • Focus on Submarines - 3(+3 building) new Nuclear Missile Subs - 2(+3 building) new attack Subs Yury Dolgoruky US Core Strategic Interest and Arctic • Protect against Attack on US Homeland – North Korea Missile Threat – increase of 14 more interceptors Ft Greely AK • Meet and Contain Rising Power of China (Asian Pivot) – Need to use Alaska as pivot point – China and Arctic Goverance US Arctic Forces • US ABM in Alaska – 26 Interceptors (GMD –Ground-based Mid-Course Defence) Ft. Greely Alaska – 14 more to be added in Alaska after North Korean Launch 2013 • Submarine Forces: • US – Seawolf and Los Angeles Class; Virginia Class • ICEX March 2009 – 2 LA class SSN • ICEX March 2011 – 1 Seawolf and 1 Virginia • ICEX March 2011 – 1 Virginia and 1 LA • ICEX March 2014 – 1 Virginia and 1 LA • ICEX March 2016 – 2 LA Chinese Navy and Arctic • 5 PLAN vessels (People’s Liberation Army Navy) ships off Aleutian Islands Sept 2015 • 3 PLAN vessels (Fleet 152) 1st visit to Sweden, Denmark, Finland Oct 2015 • Will the new Subs (SSN) be arctic capable? PLAN Jinan Source: Diplomat Canada-US: NORAD • 2000s US began to perceive NORAD importance of lessening • Feb 2016 US Commander of NORAD links Russian actions in Syria to Arctic • Modernization of North Warning System • Replacement of CF-18s • Costs for Renewal • Canada’s role in ABM Canada and NATO • Canadian Resistance to the Norwegian Arctic Initiative • Canada has been providing support of NATO’s patrols of Iceland airspace • Canada’s position if Sweden and/or Norway apply • Canada’s relations with independent Greenland Conclusion: The Emerging Arctic Security Regime • Entire Arctic is in a point of Transformation • Many Driving Features change coming from outside region –but Resource Development is leading issue • Circumpolar states are building up their combat capable force for the Arctic – New Equipment – Ice and Combat Capable – New Policies – Unilateral “concern” – New Training Conclusion • Will continue to be a disconnect between rhetoric of cooperation and reality of core security requirements of Russia, US and China • Will result in continued rebuilding of Russian arctic military capability • Will result Canada/US modernize NORAD • Will result in Northern focus of NATO • You follow the ultimate logic……..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us