RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANEGEMENT PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALL-WEATHER MULTI CARGO CAPTIVE JETTY IN A GREENFIELD SITE AT VILLAGE NANDGAON, MAHARASHTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, MUMBAI WAPCOS INDIA LIMITED (A GOVT. OF INDIA UNDERTAKING) PLOT No. 76-C, SECTOR 18, GURGAON-122 015, HARYANA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN FORTHE DEVELOPMENT OF ALL-WEATHER MULTI CARGO CAPTIVE JETTY IN A GREENFIELD SITE AT VILLAGE NANDGAON, MAHARASHTRA WAPCOS INDIA LIMITED (A GOVT. OF INDIA UNDERTAKING) PLOT NO. 76-C, SECTOR 18, GURGAON-122 015, HARYANA RA & DMP Study for All-Weather Multi Cargo Captive Jetty in a Green Field Site at Village Nandgaon, Maharashtra i INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED CONTENTS RISK ANALYSIS AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Approach to the Disaster Management Plan ................................................................. 2 1.3 General nature of the Hazards ...................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Vulnerability Profile of the Site with respect to National Disaster............................... 5 1.4 Risks due to Handling of solid bulk/break bulk Hazardous Material ............................... 9 1.5 Risks due to Handling of Liquied Hardous Material ..................................................... 17 1.5.1 Hazardous Material Proposed to be Handled on the Port ............................................ 17 1.5.2 Handling of Liquid Cargo ............................................................................................. 17 1.5.3 Identification of Hazard Scemarios .............................................................................. 19 1.5.4 Consequence Analysis of Liquid Cargo ....................................................................... 21 1.6 Risks due to Handling of Liquified Natural Gas ............................................................ 39 1.6.1 The LNG Terminal ....................................................................................................... 39 1.6.2 Identification of Hazards-Loss of Containment of LNG ................................................ 42 1.6.3 Properity of LNG.......................................................................................................... 42 1.6.4 Identification of Hazards Scenarios and Consequence Analysis .................................. 43 1.6.5 Failure Frequency Associated Loss of Containment .................................................... 50 1.7 Risks due to Vessel Collision and Grounding .............................................................. 50 1.8 Disaster Manangement Plan ....................................................................................... 52 1.8.1 Approaches to Disaster Management Plan .................................................................. 53 1.8.2 General Nature of Hazard ........................................................................................... 54 1.8.3 Designated Hazards areas of the Port ......................................................................... 54 1.8.4 Disaster Preventive and Pre-Emptive Measures..........................................................55 1.8.5 Disaster Control/Response Plan..................................................................................57 1.8.5.1 Objectives of the Plan……………………………………………………………………..57 1.8.5.2 Components of the DMP …………………………………………………………………….58 1.8.5.3 Onsite Emergency as Statutory Requirement……………………………………………..58 1.8.5.4 Emergency Control Philosophy……………………………………………………………..59 1.8.5.5 Content of the Onsite DMP......................................................................................59 1.8.5.6 Key Personnel of the Port and Responsibilities in the Event of an Emergency…………60 1.8.5.7 Safety Hardware proposed to be installed for Liquid Handling Facility…………………64 1.8.5.8 Details of First Aid and Hospital Services Available………………………………………66 1.8.5.9 Rehearsal and Testing……………………………………………………………………….66 1.8.5.10 Emergency Plan for Natural Disasters……………………………………………………67 RA & DMP Study for All-Weather Multi Cargo Captive Jetty in a Green Field Site at Village Nandgaon, Maharashtra ii INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Pasquill Stability Classes 3 Table 1.2: Vulnerability profile of the Port 4 Table 1.3: Classification of Cyclones based on Intensity 8 Table 1.4: Handling precautions for Fertilizer and FRM 12 Table 1.5: Identified Hazardous Chemicals 17 Table 1.6: Common Failure modes for Consequence Analysis 20 Table 1.7: Identification Hazard Scenarios for Consequence Analysis 21 Table 1.8: Salient Features of the LNG Terminal 39 Table 1.9: Salient Features of the FS-R-U 41 Table 1.10: Identification of Hazard Scenarios 43 Table 1.11: Distance of Consequences for Identified Scenarios 50 Table 1.12: Failure frequency 50 Table 1.13: Actions to be taken in Cyclone Emergency 67 Table 1.14: Actions to be taken in Tusnami Emergency 70 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Natural Hazards at project Site 7 Figure 1.2: Tsunami time travel chart for Andaman Sea 9 Figure 1.3: Scenario 01 – 25MM leak in 16” DCMA unloading arm/LNG STS cryogenic 44 hose of the FSU, pool fire, stability class D Figure 1.4: Scenario 02 - 25MM leak in 16” DCMA unloading arm, pool fire, stability 45 class F Figure 1.5: Scenario 03 - 25MM leak in 48” LNG ship to tank pipeline, pool fire, stability 45 class D Figure 1.6: Scenario 04 - 25MM leak in 48” LNG ship to tank pipeline, pool fire, stability 46 class F Figure 1.7: Scenario 05 - Ship to tank pipeline, UVCE, stability class D 46 Figure 1.8: Scenario 06 - Ship to tank pipeline, UVCE, stability class F 47 Figure 1.9: Scenario 07 - 25MM leak in 20” LNG LP pumpline, pool fire, stability class D 47 Figure 1.10: Scenario 08 - 25MM leak in 20” LNG LP pumpline, pool fire, stability class F 48 RA & DMP Study for All-Weather Multi Cargo Captive Jetty in a Green Field Site at Village Nandgaon, Maharashtra iii INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Figure 1.11: Scenario 09 - 25MM leak in 20” LNG LP pumpline, UVCE, stability class D 48 Figure 1.12: Scenario 10 - 25MM leak in 20” LNG LP pumpline, UVCE, stability class F 49 Figure 1.13: Scenario 11 – 1CM leak in 26” NG send out line, jet fire, stability class D 49 Figure 1.14: Scenario 12 – 1CM leak in 26” NG send out line, jet fire, stability class f 49 Figure 1.15: Organization chart for Onsite Emergency Management Plan 61 RA & DMP Study for All-Weather Multi Cargo Captive Jetty in a Green Field Site at Village Nandgaon, Maharashtra iv INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED RISK ANALYSIS AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1.1 Statutory Requirement, Coverage of the Risk Assessment The RA covers operations of the port for hazardous inventories, solid, liquid and refrigerated liquids present in stockpiles, godowns, tanks and pipelines within the boundary of the port. Chemicals qualifying as ‘Hazardous’ by virtue of listing in the Schedule 1, Part I and/or II of the Manufacturing Storage and handling of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 (amended 2000), (MSIHC Rules) have been considered for consequence analysis for RA. Following typical hydrocarbon products proposed to be handled on oil jetties of ports have been considered for the RA: a. Naphtha b. Motor Spirit c. Superior Kerosene Oil/Aviation Turbine Fuel d. High Speed Diesel e. Heavy/fuel oils Following non-hydrocarbon bulk liquid cargo have been considered for RA, though their annual shipment volumes may be lesser than the hydrocarbon liquids: a. Acitic Acid b. Aniline c. Benzene d. Caustic Lye e. Ethyl alcohol f. Ethylene Di-Chloride g. Hexane h. Liquor ammonia i. Methanol j. Mono Ethylene Glycol k. Styrene l. Toulene m. Xylene The port proposes an 08 MMTPA LNG import terminal/3.5 MMTPA FSRU in addition to liquid cargo jetties. The LNG terminal may be on-shore storage-gassification-sendout type, RA& DMP Study for All-Weather Multi Cargo Captive Jetty in a Green Field site at Village Nandgaon, Maharashtra 1 INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED or a moored, along-side berthing FSU based LNG storage with on-jetty-deck open rack vaporisers. The project inter alia attracts application and compliances under following statutes relevant to port and personnel safety: 1. Factories Act, 1948, Maharashtra Factory Rules, 1953 2. Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals (Amended) Rules, 2000 3. Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996 4. Petroleum Act, 1934, Petroleum Rules, 2002 The RA also discusses risks due to vessel collision and grounding and risks due to fire and explosion of hazardous cargo in the vessels within the notified port limit/administrative limit of the proposed port. The DMP covers emergency response of the port during natural hazards and hazards due to release and compound consequences of hazardous chemicals. 1.2 Site Meteorology Meteorology of a site plays an important part in its natural hazard vulnerability and dispersal characteristics in case of loss of containment of any hazardous material. The consequences of released toxic or flammable material are largely dependent on the prevailing weather conditions. For the consequence analysis of major scenarios the most important meteorological parameters are wind speed, atmospheric stability and temperature as they directly affect the atmospheric dispersion of the escaping material. Rainfall does not have any direct bearing on the results of the consequence analysis; however,