Schuder, Ted TITLE Teachers' First Year of Transactional Strategies Instruction

Schuder, Ted TITLE Teachers' First Year of Transactional Strategies Instruction

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 362 853 CS 011 449 AUTHOR El-Dinary, Pamela Beard; Schuder, Ted TITLE Teachers' First Year of Transactional Strategies Instruction. Reading Research Report No. 5. INSTITUTION National Reading Research Center, Athens, GA.; National Reading Research Center, College Park, MD. SPONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 93 CONTRACT 117A20007 NOTE 33p. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE 14F01/12CO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Education; Inservice Teacher Education; Program Effectiveness; *Reading Instruction; Reading Research; *Teacher Attitudes; *Teacher Response; Teaching Methods; Teaching Styles IDENTIFIERS *Transactional Strategies Instruction ABSTRACT Two studies examined seven teachers' acceptance of a strategies-based approach to reading instruction during their first year of using the intervention. Interviews andobservations revealed that the intervention, a long-term transactional strategies instruction program called SAIL (Students Achieving Independent Learning), was fully acceptable to only two of the seven teachers. Issues that influenced acceptability included professional development support and teacher choice. Recommendations that could lead to greater acceptance of transactional strategies instruction by teachers using it for the first time are offered. Briefly, teachers need: several years of professional development; a safe, supportive school environment; explanations and modeling of what good strategy teachers do; and encouragement and support from program developers. (Two tables of data are included and 14 questionnaire items relevant to acceptability are appended. Contains 61 references.) (Author/RS) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Teachers' First Year of Transactional Strategies Instruction Pamela Beard El-Dinary Georgetown University Ted Winder Maryland State Department of Education U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 0-- Office ot Educahonal Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) AThis document has been reprOduced as receved I rorn the person or orgarfizatmn ongrnafing .1 f 1 Minor changes have been made to rmprove reproduction quality Pougs ol vretv or opinions stated tn thtsdocu. ment do not necessarily represent official OE RI posfion or poficy National NRRC Reading Research Center READING RESEARCH REPORT NO. 5 Fall 1993 BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 NRRC National Reading Research Center Teachers' First Year of Transactional Strategies Instruction Pamela Beard El-Dinary Georgetown University Language Research Projects Ted Schuder Maryland State Department of Education READING RESEARCH REPORT NO. 5 Fall 1993 The work reported herein was prepared with partial support from the NationalReading Research Center of the University of Georgia and University of Maryland. It was supported under the Educational Research and Development Centers Program (PR/AWARDNO. 117A20007) as administered by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement,U.S. Department of Education. The findings and opinions expressed here do notnecessarily reflect the position or policies of the National Reading Research Center, the Office ofEducational Research and Improvement, or the U.S. Department of Education. 3 NRRC National Reading Research Center Executive Committee National Advisory Board Donna E. Alvermann, Co-Director Phyllis W. Aldrich University of Georgia Saratoga Warren Board of Cooperative Educational John T. Guthrie, Co-Director Services, Saratoga Springs, New York University of Maryland College Park Arthur N. Applebee James F. Baumann, Associate Director State University of New York, Albany University of Georgia Ronald S. Brandt Patricia S. Koskinen, Associate Director Association for Supervision and Curriculum University of Maryland College Park Development JoBeth Allen Marsha T. DeLain University of Georgia Delaware Department of Public Instruction John F. O'Flahavan Carl A. Grant University of Maryland College Park University of Wtsconsin-Madison James V. Hoffman Walter Kintsch University of Texas at Austin University of Colorado at Boulder Cynthia R. Hynd Robert L. Linn University of Georgia University of Colorado at Boulder Robert Serpell Luis C. Moll University of Maryland Baltimore County University of Arizona Carol M. Santa Publications Editors School District No. 5 Research Reports and Perspectives Kalispell, Montana David Reinking, Receiving Editor Anne P. Sweet University of Georgia Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Linda Baker, Tracking Editor U.S. Department of Education University of Maryland Baltimore County Louise Cherry Wilkinson Linda C. DeGroff, Tracking Editor Rutgers University University of Georgia Instructional Resources Technical Writer and Production Editor Lee Galda, University of Georgia Susan L. Yarborough Research Highlights University of Georgia William G. Holliday University of Maryland College Park Policy Briefs NRitC - University of Georgia James V. Hoffman 318 Aderhold University of Texas at Aastin University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 30602-7125 Videos (706) 542-3674 Fax: (706) 542-3678 Shawn M. Glynn, University of Georgia INTERNET: [email protected] NRRC Staff Barbara F. Howard, Office Manager NRRC - University of Maryland College Park Melissa M. Erwin, Senior Secretary 2102 J. M. Patterson Building University of Georgia University of Maryland College Park, Maryland 20742 Barbara A. Neitzey, Administrative Assistant (301) 405-8035 Fax: (301) 314-9625 Valerie Tyra, Accountant INTERNET: [email protected] University of Maryland College Park About the National Reading Research Center The National Reading Research Center (NRRC) is Dissemination is an important feature of NRRC activi- funded by tho Office of Educational Research and ties. Information on NPRC research appears in several Improvement of the U.S. Department of Education to formats. Research Reports communicate the results of conduct research on reading and reading instruction. original research or synthesize the findings of several The NRRC is operated by a consortium of the Universi- lines of inquiry. They are written primarily for re- ty of Georgia and the University of Maryland College searchers studying various areas of reading and reading Park in collaboration with researchers at several institu- instruction. The Perspective Series presents a wide tions nationwide. range of publications, from calls for research and The NRRC's mission is to discover and document commentary on research and practice to first-person those conditions in homes, schools, and communities accounts of experiencesinschools.Instructional that encourage children to become skilled, enthusiastic, Resources include curriculum materials, instructional lifelong readers. NRRC researchers are committed to guides, and materials for professional growth, designed advancing the development of instructional programs primarily for teachers. sensitive to the cognitive, sociocultural, and motiva- For more information about the NRRC's research tional factors that affect children's success in reading. projects and other activities, or to have your name NRRC researchers from a variety of disciplines conduct added to the mailing list, please contact: studies with teachers and students from widely diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds in prekinder- Donna E. Alvermann, Co-Director garten through grade 12 classrooms. Research projects National Reading Research Center deal with the influence of family and family-school 318 Aderhold Hall interactions on the development of literacy; the interac- University of Georgia tion of sociocultural factors and motivation to read; the Athens, GA 30602-7125 impact of literature-based reading programs on reading (706) 542-3674 achievement; the effects of reading strategies instruction on comprehension and critical thinking in literature, John T. Guthrie, Co-Director science, and history; the influence of innovative group National Reading Research Center participation structures on motivation and learning; the 2102 J. M. Patterson Building potential of computer technology to enhance literacy; University of Maryland and the development of methods and standards for College Park, MD 20742 alternative literacy assessments. (301) 405-8035 The NRRC is further committed to the participation of teachers as full partners in its research. A better understanding of how teachers view the development of literacy, how they use knowledge from research, and how they approach change in the classroom is crucial to improving instruction. To further this understanding, the NRRC conducts school-based research in which teachers explore their own philosophical and pedagogi- cal orientations and trace their professional growth. 5 NRRC Editorial Review Board Patrkia Adkins Karin Dahl Susan Hill University of Georgia Ohio State University University of Maryland College Fark Peter Afflerbach Lynne Diaz-Rico Sally Hudson-Ross University of Maryland College Park California State University-San University of Georgia Bernardino JoBeth Allen Cynthia Hynd University of Georgia Mariam Jean Dreher University of Georgia Patty Anders University of Maryland College Park University of Arizona Robert Jimenez Pamela Dunston University of Oregon Tom Anderson University of Georgia University of Illinois at Urbana- Karen Johnson Champaign Jim Flood

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us