Differential Methylation of the TRPA1 Promoter in Pain Sensitivity

Differential Methylation of the TRPA1 Promoter in Pain Sensitivity

ARTICLE Received 21 Nov 2012 | Accepted 21 Nov 2013 | Published 4 Feb 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3978 OPEN Differential methylation of the TRPA1 promoter in pain sensitivity J.T. Bell1,2, A.K. Loomis3, L.M. Butcher4,F.Gao5, B. Zhang3, C.L. Hyde3, J. Sun5,H.Wu5, K. Ward1, J. Harris1, S. Scollen6, M.N. Davies1,7, L.C. Schalkwyk7, J. Mill7,8, The MuTHER Consortium*, F.M.K. Williams1,N.Li5, P. Deloukas9,10,11, S. Beck4, S.B. McMahon12, J. Wang5,11,13,14, S.L. John3, T.D. Spector1, Chronic pain is a global public health problem, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. Here we examine genome-wide DNA methylation, first in 50 identical twins discordant for heat pain sensitivity and then in 50 further unrelated individuals. Whole- blood DNA methylation was characterized at 5.2 million loci by MeDIP sequencing and assessed longitudinally to identify differentially methylated regions associated with high or low pain sensitivity (pain DMRs). Nine meta-analysis pain DMRs show robust evidence for association (false discovery rate 5%) with the strongest signal in the pain gene TRPA1 (P ¼ 1.2 Â 10 À 13). Several pain DMRs show longitudinal stability consistent with susceptibility effects, have similar methylation levels in the brain and altered expression in the skin. Our approach identifies epigenetic changes in both novel and established candidate genes that provide molecular insights into pain and may generalize to other complex traits. 1 Department of Twin Research and Genetics Epidemiology, Kings College London, London SE1 7EH, UK. 2 Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK. 3 Pfizer Research Laboratories, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA. 4 Medical Genomics, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 5 BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China. 6 Pfizer Limited, Neusentis, The Portway Building, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UK. 7 Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK. 8 University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK. 9 William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. 10 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK. 11 Princess Al-Jawhara Al-Brahim Centre of Excellence in Research of Hereditary Disorders (PACER-HD), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia. 12 Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK. 13 Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. 14 Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai long, Taipa, Macau 999078, China.* A full list of the MuTHER consortium and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.W. (email: [email protected]) or to T.D.S. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:2978 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3978 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3978 cute and chronic pain have an impact on 20% of the powerful tool for aggregating information from multiple population worldwide and represent a significant ther- independent studies18 and is routinely used for pooling Aapeutic and economic challenge1,2. Sensitivity to pain is a results from genome-wide association studies19, where it has complex phenotype, which reflects the contribution of multiple successfully identified many disease-associated genetic variants biological, psychological and environmental risk factors. There is with small effect sizes, not revealed in the individual substantial variation in individual pain sensitivity3, only about studies20–22. We thereby obtained MA pain DMRs (MAP- half of which is explained by genetic effects, based on evidence DMRs) that were strongly supported by both cohorts and from animal studies4,5, twin-based heritability estimates6,7 and further investigated. genetic association analyses8. Multiple experimental approaches have been used to study pain mechanisms9,10. Chronic pain is Genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation in MZ twins. The known to be underpinned by several biological processes that DNA methylation sequencing data allowed us to assess at high together serve to amplify pain-related signals. The most well resolution the distribution of DNA methylation patterns across characterized of these are sensitization of the nociceptive nerve the genome. We observed greater correlation in DNA methyla- fibres (that innervate peripheral tissues), sensitization of the tion profiles within MZ pairs compared with pairs of unrelated spinal circuits relaying signals associated with tissue damage and individuals, as expected and consistent with previous studies23 strong cortical modulation reflecting expectation, mood and past (Fig. 1a–c). At a few genomic regions, the correlation pattern was history. Recent evidence points to the involvement of epigenetic reversed (Fig. 1c), potentially highlighting regions of high DNA mechanisms across these molecular systems, both in the methylation turnover. However, at the majority of loci across the development and maintenance of pain states11,12. genome DNA methylation patterns were positively correlated DNA methylation is an essential epigenetic mechanism, which within MZ twins. The intraclass correlation coefficient within MZ in mammals occurs at cytosine residues, predominantly in the twins across the genome was estimated at 0.064 per 1 kb bin context of CpG dinucleotides. DNA methylation is relevant for (Fig. 1b), but the estimates showed variability across different gene expression regulation, genomic imprinting, development regions and at different resolutions (Fig. 1a). We assessed and genomic stability. Emerging epigenome-wide association evidence for allele-specific methylation (ASM) in the discovery studies (EWAS) in humans suggest that epigenetic modifications set of 50 MZ twins and observed ASM (Methods) at 37.8% of may play a pivotal role in complex traits13. Recent EWAS of DNA tested autosomal heterozygous variants within an individual methylation differences in disease-discordant monozygotic (MZ) (considering only variants that were heterozygous in at least 50% twins have identified potentially differentially methylated regions of the sample). Overall, 106 heterozygous variants had evidence (DMRs) in several complex diseases, ranging from diabetes to for ASM in at least 50% of the sample and 499% of these schizophrenia14–16. Epigenetic analyses of discordant twins can variants showed concordance for ASM of the same allele (or ASM provide a powerful study design, but the power of this approach skew) within MZ twin pairs (Fig. 1a). As expected, DNA has not yet been tested in large samples at high resolution. Here methylation levels were also strongly correlated with genomic we performed detailed genome-wide analyses of DNA location and with previously annotated epigenetic variants and methylation and identified modest but consistent and regulatory regions (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. S4), where significant DNA methylation changes associated with pain CpG islands and promoters had significantly reduced levels of sensitivity, with implications for epigenetic studies of other DNA methylation. complex traits. Pain-sensitivity epigenome-wide analyses. We tested for asso- Results ciation between DNA methylation variation and pain sensitivity Epigenome-wide association study design. We obtained DNA to identify DMRs related to pain (pain DMRs). We first per- methylation sequencing profiles in a discovery sample of 25 MZ formed pain-sensitivity EWAS in the discovery (MZ twin) and twin pairs (50 MZ twins) who were discordant for heat pain second (unrelated individuals) cohorts separately. In the dis- sensitivity (heat pain tolerance 42 °C between twins) determined covery sample of 50 twins, we compared DNA methylation scores experimentally using quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 1 kb bins across the genome to pain scores for each individual, (Supplementary Fig. S1). QST is commonly used for the assess- using a linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) model controlling ment of pain sensitivity and the heat pain tolerance response for family structure (Supplementary Fig. S5 and Supplementary (measured using the heat pain suprathreshold (HPST)) has been Table S1). At a permutation-based false discovery rate (FDR) of shown to be a clinically relevant QST measure17. We then 5% (nominal LMER P ¼ 8.4 Â 10 À 9), there was one significant obtained DNA methylation levels in a second independent pain DMR in an intergenic region on chromosome 3 (LMER sample of 50 unrelated individuals who did not overlap with P ¼ 8.4 Â 10 À 9). Among the remaining top-ranked pain DMRs the individuals in the discovery sample of MZ twins (Supple- was MVP (ranked fourth; LMER P ¼ 7.9 Â 10 À 8), which is mentary Fig. S1). Whole-blood DNA methylation patterns involved in the interferon-g signalling pathway24, previously were assayed using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation implicated in neuropathic pain25. We also estimated pain DMRs followed by deep sequencing (MeDIP-seq), performed within specific genomic annotation categories (CpG islands, separately in the MZ twin sample and in the sample of CpG-island shores, and promoters) and found that the top- unrelated individuals, resulting in an average of 50 million ranked regions included the pain gene TRPA1 (ranked fourth, paired-end

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us