Final Evaluation Multi-stakeholder Model for Ending Gender-Based Violence Project Kayah March 2010 Evaluators: Raquel Fernandez Costa, Zin Mar Tun, Sofia Raineri Table of Contents 1. List of acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Charts and tables ........................................................................................................................ 3 3. Executive summary and recommendations ............................................................................. 4 4. Introduction and background .................................................................................................... 5 4.1. Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 6 4.2. Purpose and scope of the evaluation ............................................................................... 7 5. Methodology and limitations ..................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Quantitative Methodology .................................................................................................. 7 5.2. Qualitative data ................................................................................................................... 9 5.3. Limitations to the Evaluation ............................................................................................. 9 6. Evaluation findings ................................................................................................................... 10 6.1. Relevance .......................................................................................................................... 10 6.2. Efficiency ........................................................................................................................... 12 6.3. Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... 16 6.3.1. Project Outcome 1: KSWN, its member organizations and non-member organizations are an increasingly independent organizations who work for longer-term impact and sustainability as they have increased technical and organizational capacity to prevent and respond to GBV . 19 6.3.2. Project Outcome 2: GBV survivors have access to a full range of quality GBV services in a timely and safe manner ........................................................................................................ 31 6.3.3. Project Outcome 3: KSWN has strengthened support and enabling environment to reinforce GBV prevention and response through their advocacy efforts .................................... 35 6.3.4. Project Outcome 4: The vulnerability of GBV survivors and women in the communities have reduced through increased skills and capacities, access to financial services and economic opportunities ............................................................................................................................... 39 6.4. Impact ................................................................................................................................ 41 6.5. Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 43 7. Key lessons learned and good practices ............................................................................... 44 8. Conclusions and Recommendations ...................................................................................... 45 9. Annexes ..................................................................................................................................... 47 Annex1 – Evaluation Matrix ......................................................................................................... 47 Annex 2 – Questionnaire .............................................................................................................. 49 Annex 3 - Quantitative data: villages surveyed ......................................................................... 58 Annex 4 – Interview guides .......................................................................................................... 59 Annex 5 – List of Informants FGDs and KIIs per township ....................................................... 64 Annex 6 – Interview schedule / agenda ...................................................................................... 65 1 1. List of acronyms CEDAW - The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women CSOs - Civil Society Organisations DSW - Department of Social Welfare FGDs - Focus Group Discussions GAD - General Administration Department GBV - Gender Based Violence HH - Household IGAs - Income Generating Activities IPV - Intimate Partner Violence KIIs - key informant interviews KNWO – Karenni National Women’s Organisation KPBA - Kayah Phu Baptist Association KSWN - Karenni State Women Network M&E – Monitoring and Evaluation MSWRR – Ministry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement NSPAW - The National Strategic Plan for the Advancement of Women SPARC – Supporting Partnership and Resilience of Communities in Northern Rakhine ToRs - Terms of Reference ToT - Training of trainers VDOs - Village Development Organisations VRM - Vulnerable Rural Women VSLAs - Villages Saving and Loans Associations WDC - Women Development Center 2 2. Charts and tables Figure 1 - Budget Lines ....................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 2– Number of respondents by gender. .................................................................................... 16 Figure 3 - Age and Gender of the Respondents ................................................................................. 17 Figure 4 - Educational Level by Gender ............................................................................................. 17 Figure 5– Position in the HH by Gender ............................................................................................. 18 Figure 6– Number of People Involved in CARE Groups ..................................................................... 18 Figure 7- % of people who reject IPV. Comparative baseline – endline. ............................................ 20 Figure 8– People rejecting IPV by gender. Results per each of the statements measured. Comparative baseline – endline. .............................................................................................................................. 21 Figure 9 – Understanding of IPV. Comparative baseline – endline. ................................................... 22 Figure 10– Understanding IPV by township in 2020. .......................................................................... 23 Figure 11– Understanding IPV by gender in 2020 .............................................................................. 24 Figure 12– Understanding of IPV by gender. Comparative baseline – endline. Number of cases of IPV that an individual is able to identify. .................................................................................................... 24 Figure 13 – Violence against women is normal in relationships. Comparative baseline – endline by gender. ................................................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 14 – Have you ever helped someone who suffers from GBV? Comparative baseline - endline ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 15 – Have you ever referred someone suffering from GBV to any service available in the community? Comparative baseline - endline ...................................................................................... 27 Figure 16 – Those that have referred someone towards what service are referring them. Comparative baseline -endline. ................................................................................................................................ 28 Figure 17– Cases referred by gender. Endline. .................................................................................. 28 Figure 18– If there is a case of violence, who do people report to? Endline. ..................................... 29 Figure 19- If there is a case of violence, who do people report to? Baseline. .................................... 29 Figure 20 – Respondents that have experienced GBV personally by gender. Endline. ..................... 32 Figure 21 – Number of the cases that were referred by township. Endline. ....................................... 32 Figure 22 – To what services are the declared cases addressed. Endline. ....................................... 33 Figure 23 – Respondents that heard their community leaders speak about GBV. Comparative baseline – endline. ............................................................................................................................................ 37 Figure 24 – From what community leader have you heard? Comparative baseline – endline. .......... 37 Figure 25– Rating of the level of support from community leaders to GBV survivors by gender. Endline. ...........................................................................................................................................................