Canopy Spectral Reflectance

Canopy Spectral Reflectance

Published August 17, 2015 RESEARCH Evaluating Grain Yield in Spring Wheat with Canopy Spectral Reflectance B.C. Bowman, J. Chen,* J. Zhang, J. Wheeler, Y. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Nayak, N. Heslot, H. Bockelman, and J.M. Bonman B.C. Bowman, J. Chen, J. Wheeler, Y. Wang, W. Zhao, Zhang, J., Abstract and S. Nayak, Dep. of Plant Soil and Entomological Sciences, Univ. of Worldwide, improving grain yield is the most Idaho, 1693 S. 2700 W. Aberdeen, ID 83210; N. Heslot, Dep. of Plant important target for wheat (Triticum aestivum Breeding and Genetics, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853; H. Bockel- L.) breeders. Fast, cost-effective, and nonde- man, and J.M. Bonman, USDA–ARS, Small Grains and Potato Germ- structive phenotyping methods for important plasm Research Unit, 1691 South 2700 West, Aberdeen, ID 83210. traits are needed to increase the efficiency of Received 5 Aug. 2014. Accepted 1 Apr. 2015. *Corresponding author cultivar development. The present study tested ([email protected]). canopy spectral reflectance (CSR) as a potential Abbreviations: CSR, canopy spectral reflectance; CSR , 25% plots high-throughput method for assessing wheat 25 for each canopy spectral reflectance at each growth stage; DR, terminal grain yield in a diverse set of 540 spring-habit drought; DZNI, dry Zea N index; H2, broad-sense heritability; HY , accessions from the USDA–ARS National Small 10 10% highest yielding accessions; HY , 25% highest yielding accessions; Grains Collection. Plots were grown under irri- 25 IR, irrigated; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; NSGC, gated (IR) and terminal drought (DR) treatments National Small Grains Collection; NWI, normalized water index; over two growing seasons, and CSR was mea- ONI, Oryza N index; PRI, photochemical reflectance index; PSSRa, sured at several growth stages in each year. pigment specific simple ratio chlorophyll-a; REML, restricted maxi- The CSR indices related to canopy water and mum likelihood; RNDVI, red normalized difference vegetation index; N status, biomass, and photosynthetic area SI, standard index; WI, water index. were evaluated for their relation to grain yield. The CSR indices were significantly correlated with yield at every growth stage, with anthesis and grain filling being the most useful for pre- heat yields have increased over the past few decades, in dicting grain yield in IR and DR environments. Wpart, because of genetic improvements such as the incor- Single CSR indices selected up to 57% of the poration of dwarfing genes, increased disease resistance and highest 25% yielding lines in DR conditions and abiotic stress tolerance, and development of locally adapted culti- the grain yield of accessions selected using vars (Reynolds et al., 2009, 2012). However, from 1959 to 2008 CSR was 20% greater than randomly selected the estimated yield gain has been 1.1% annually, with most of the genotypes. Canopy spectral reflectance also yield increase occurring before 1984 (Graybosch and Peterson, identified up to 86% of the highest 10% yield- 2010; Pingali, 2012). Current estimates of annual yield increase ing accessions. Canopy spectral reflectance for wheat over the past 20 yr are <1% (Fischer and Edmeades, may be valuable as a high-throughput means 2010) and are insufficient to meet the projected 1.7 to 2.4% of selecting for yield in large trials of genetically diverse wheat genotypes. increase needed to keep pace with the growing world population Published in Crop Sci. 55:1881–1890 (2015). doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0533 © Crop Science Society of America | 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. CROP SCIENCE, VOL. 55, SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2015 WWW.CROPS.ORG 1881 (Reynolds et al., 2012; Ray et al., 2013). In addition to the Romagosa, 1989). Similarly, plant N status measurements concern of population growth, the threat of worldwide are time consuming and require removal of leaf tissue and climate change and its effects on cropping systems will laboratory procedures to assess N content (Feng et al., 2011). be an additional challenge for breeders to overcome in Previous studies have shown CSR indices to be pre- efforts to improve wheat grain yield (Fedoroff et al., 2010; dictors of yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (Hansen, Malcolm et al., 2012; Stamp and Visser, 2012; Arbuckle 2002), rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Inoue and Moran, 1998), corn et al., 2013). The use of novel germplasm and improved (Zea mays L.) (Teal et al., 2006), durum wheat (Triticum phenotyping tools would aid breeders by increasing their turgidum L.) (Aparicio et al., 1999), winter wheat (Hansen, efficiency and widening the genetic base of wheat. 2002; Prasad et al., 2007a), and bread wheat (Gutierrez Fast, cost-effective, and nondestructive high-through- et al., 2010b). Babar et al. (2006a) found indices related put phenotyping platforms have gained interest in recent to photochemical, biomass, and canopy water content years for use by breeders to decrease the time and costs related indices to be highly correlated (>0.80) with yields required to assess new genotypes (Cabrera-Bosquet et al., to explain upward of 50% of the yield variation observed 2012). While genotyping technologies have improved sig- across multiple years in a group of 15 high-yielding nificantly, in-field phenotyping tools have not kept pace CIMMYT bread wheat genotypes. (Araus and Cairns, 2014). A problem when attempting to Canopy spectral reflectance has the potential to aid accurately phenotype large numbers of plants is control- breeding programs in which large numbers of individu- ling the growing conditions. The use of growth chambers als must be screened in a fast and cost-effective manner. and greenhouses allows for the highest levels of environ- Canopy spectral reflectance could facilitate line develop- ment control but does not reflect actual field conditions, ment by identifying superior genotypes at or before anthe- whereas field experiments suffer from heterogeneous soil sis, allowing for crosses to be made before grain yields have and environmental conditions (Araus and Cairns, 2014). been evaluated. Previous studies on CSR relation to yields Statistical adjustments of spatial variation found in field have used small groups (n < 50) of advanced breeding lines conditions are commonly used to reduce the effects of (Babar et al., 2006c; Gutierrez et al., 2010b), biparental environmental influences on data analysis. Canopy spec- populations (Babar et al., 2006b; Prasad et al., 2007a), or tral reflectance is one of the first high-throughput phe- commercial cultivars (Babar et al., 2006b; Prasad et al., notyping platforms applied to field assessment of crops 2007a). For a technology to be useful to breeders, it must (Aparicio et al., 1999). While the accuracy of phenotypic be applicable to a wide range of genotypes and growing data taken in the field will most always be affected by conditions. While genotype selection by CSR has been heterogeneous environmental conditions to some extent, successfully implemented in several wheat growing envi- CSR indices have been used to not only assess crop char- ronments (Gutierrez et al., 2010b), screening of large, acteristics but also as a means of mapping and adjusting for genetically diverse panels of wheat genotypes has not been field heterogeneity (Araus and Cairns, 2014). reported previously. Canopy spectral reflectance is based on the differ- In the present study, we used CSR as a high-through- ential pattern of light reflectance on leaves at photosyn- put phenotyping tool to assess grain yield in a diverse thetically active wavelengths (400–700 nm) and infrared collection of accessions from the USDA–ARS National wavelengths (700–1000 nm). Canopy spectral reflectance Small Grains Collection (NSGC). Our goals were to indices can be used to estimate plant characteristics such assess CSR indices for predicting grain yield under irri- as leaf N content (Wright and Ritchie, 2003; 2004; Wei gated and water-stressed conditions and to identify high- et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2008; Feng et al., 2011), photo- yielding germplasm in a large, diverse set of wheat lines synthetic active biomass (Aparicio et al., 1999), leaf chlo- from the NSGC using CSR. rophyll content, and plant water status (Penuelas et al., 1997a,b; Aparicio et al., 1999; Araus, 2002; Babar et al., MaterIALS anD MethODS 2006a,c; Prasad et al., 2007a; Gutierrez et al., 2010b). Plant Material Direct measurements of plant biomass, water status, The plant material used in this study consisted of 540 spring wheat photosynthetic capacity, and leaf N status are associated accessions from the NSGC common wheat core subset based on with agronomic traits such as yield and grain protein, but heading dates and uniformity during an initial screen in 2010. these conventional methods all have disadvantages. Mea- The NSGC is a component of the National Plant Germplasm suring plant biomass requires destruction of the entire plant System in the USDA–ARS. The 540 spring wheat accessions and is impractical for screening large numbers of geno- originated from six continents and 81 countries and included types (Van Ginkel et al., 1998). Assessing plant water status cultivars, breeding

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us