Structurally Preserved Fungi from Antarctica: Diversity and Interactions in Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Polar Forest Ecosystems CARLA J

Structurally Preserved Fungi from Antarctica: Diversity and Interactions in Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Polar Forest Ecosystems CARLA J

Antarctic Science 28(3), 153–173 (2016) © Antarctic Science Ltd 2016 doi:10.1017/S0954102016000018 Structurally preserved fungi from Antarctica: diversity and interactions in late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic polar forest ecosystems CARLA J. HARPER1,2, THOMAS N. TAYLOR2, MICHAEL KRINGS1,2 and EDITH L. TAYLOR2 1Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 Munich, Germany 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-7534, USA [email protected] Abstract: Chert and silicified wood from the Permian through Cretaceous of Antarctica contain abundant information on fungal diversity and plant–fungal interactions. The chert deposits represent a particularly interesting setting for the study of plant–fungal interactions because they preserve remains of distinctive high latitude forest ecosystems with polar light regimes that underwent a profound climate change from icehouse to greenhouse conditions. Moreover, some of the cherts and wood show the predominance of extinct groups of seed plants (e.g. Glossopteridales, Corystospermales). Over the past 30 years, documentation of fossil fungi from Antarctica has shifted from a by-product of plant descriptive studies to a focused research effort. This paper critically reviews the published record of fungi and fungal associations and interactions in the late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic cherts and silicified wood from Antarctica; certain fungal palynomorphs and fungal remains associated with adpression fossils and cuticles are also considered. Evidence of mutualistic (mycorrhizal), parasitic and saprotrophic fungi associated with plant roots, stems, leaves and reproductive organs is presented, together with fungi occurring within the peat matrix and animal–fungus interactions. Special attention is paid to the morphology of the fungi, their systematic position and features that can be used to infer fungal nutritional modes. Received 7 September 2015, accepted 9 January 2016, first published online 18 March 2016 Key words: Cretaceous, Jurassic, mycorrhiza, peat, Permian, Triassic Introduction consequently, can be documented from the fossil record. Although fossil evidence of fungal associations and Extant plants enter into multiple types of associations interactions is generally rather rare, the examples with other organisms, including bacteria, viruses, algae, reported to date suggest that fungi in fact played fungi and animals (Chapman & Good 1983, Palukaitis important roles in ancient ecosystems and in the et al. 2008, Herrera & Pellmyr 2009, Soto et al. 2009, evolutionary history of life (Pirozynski & Malloch 1975, Southworth 2012). Of these, fungi are capable of Hawksworth 1991, Taylor et al. 2015). Until relatively profoundly affecting the plants and environments in recently, fossil fungi found in association with other which they occur through the formation of permanent organisms have mostly been described cursorily and or temporary interactions that range from mutualistic to rarely been placed into a palaeoecological context. parasitic (Redman et al. 2001). Moreover, fungi act as the Today, however, the importance of fungal interactions principal decomposers of lignified plant parts (Kirk & as a driving force in modern ecosystems is widely Farrell 1987). Numerous types of fungal interactions that acknowledged and, consequently, palaeobiologists take occur with plants also exist with animals (e.g. Lawrence & increased effort to document fossil fungal associations Milner 1996). Moreover, fungi serve as the primary food and interpret the roles these organisms may have played source for certain animals (Fogel & Trappe 1978), and in the ecosystems in which they lived. many animals, especially arthropods, are effective as Plants may become preserved as fossils in a variety of vectors in the distribution of fungal spores (e.g. Bultman modes (Schopf 1975), each demonstrating a different & Mathews 1996). complement of information on the organism. However, Since fungal interactions are prevalent in modern only three of these preservation types can provide ecosystems, it would be reasonable to assume that these details of the internal organization (anatomy, histology) interactions also existed in ancient ecosystems and, of a plant, i.e. petrifactions, permineralizations and, to a 153 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. UB der LMU München, on 04 Dec 2018 at 14:07:56, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102016000018 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102016000018 Downloaded from 154 Table I. Fungi and fungus-like organisms in structurally preserved plant remains and chert from the late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic of Antarctica. Solid black circles (●) indicate definitive evidence for https://www.cambridge.org/core affinities; open white circles (○) indicate putative or speculative affinity. Fungal palynomorphs and adpression records are excluded. UB derLMU München , on 04 Dec2018 at14:07:56 CARLA J. HARPER , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at et al . https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms . ANTARCTIC FOSSIL FUNGI 155 (Continued) Table I. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. UB der LMU München, on 04 Dec 2018 at 14:07:56, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102016000018 156 CARLA J. HARPER et al. (Continued) Table I. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. UB der LMU München, on 04 Dec 2018 at 14:07:56, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102016000018 ANTARCTIC FOSSIL FUNGI 157 lesser extent, amber (Taylor et al. 2009). On the other volcanic activity reflected in the geologic record (Hergt & hand, compression fossils may yield information on Brauns 2001, Riley et al. 2006, Bromfield et al. 2007, the epidermal anatomy if preserved in fine-grained Elliot & Fleming 2008). Jurassic chert containing plant sediment. Petrifaction occurs when the cell lumina and remains and fungi, as well as silicified wood, come from walls are completely replaced by minerals, possibly as a the Gair Mesa Range, northern Victoria Land, and the weathering effect. In contrast, permineralization is a form Carapace Nunatak, southern Victoria Land (Gunn & of preservation in which minerals have replaced the Warren 1962, Gair et al. 1965, Ballance & Watters 1971, internal contents of the cells, but the cell walls are not Bomfleur et al. 2011, Hieger et al. 2015). During the completely replaced by minerals (Williams & Crerar Cretaceous, Antarctica reached the approximate 1985, Williams et al. 1985). The anatomical details geographical position that it occupies today (Lawver provided by these two modes of preservation provide an et al. 1992), but was still considered a climatic greenhouse. unparalleled level of resolution to study fungal Several sites on the Antarctic Peninsula, including interactions in the fossil record. Alexander Island, James Ross Island, Livingston Island, The co-occurrence of permineralized deposits from Table Nunatak and Seymour Island have yielded silicified multiple periods of geologic time in one area is wood (including specimens that contain fungi), as well as exceptionally rare. Some of the best-known examples foliage fossils, spores and pollen grains, and flowers come from the Permian, Triassic and Jurassic of the (Francis et al. 2008). Transantarctic Mountains (Taylor et al. 1989, Taylor & Since the initial review of Antarctic fossil fungi by Taylor 1990, Bomfleur et al. 2014b). In contrast to the Taylor (1990) a considerable body of new information has harsh environment of Antarctica today, favourable been amassed on the fungi occurring in the plant-bearing climatic conditions existed during warmer periods of cherts and silicified wood from Antarctica. However, this Earth history supporting a rich forest vegetation in South evidence is scattered and often included in works focusing Polar latitudes (e.g. Cantrill & Poole 2013). Middle on other aspects of ancient life in Antarctica. This Permian (Wordian) permineralized peat (i.e. a chert that review critically surveys the evidence of fungi extending formed within a peat-forming environment) occur in the from the Permian to Cretaceous in chert deposits and Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica (Bennett & silicified wood from Antarctica, as well as reports on Taylor 1972, McLoughlin et al. 1997), whereas Late certain fungal palynomorphs, dispersed remains and Permian and Middle Triassic (Anisian) permineralized compression-impression fungal fossils, and is intended peats have been reported from the central Transantarctic primarily as a tool to access the primary literature, but Mountains (Barrett 1969, Schopf 1970, Taylor et al. may also be used to define future research perspectives. 1989). The Transantarctic Mountain deposits have been It focuses on the evidence of mutualistic and parasitic suggested as peat mire rafts that eroded into river plant–fungal interactions, as well as saprotrophism, channels, and once entombed in sand, silica-rich water but also addresses dispersed fungal remains from the initiated the permineralization process (Taylor et al. 1989, matrix and examples of fungi as components

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    21 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us