Indholdsfortegnelse Indholdsfortegnelse

Indholdsfortegnelse Indholdsfortegnelse

Roskilde Universitet efterår 2012 Den Samfundsvidenskabelige Bacheloruddannelse, 3. semester Camilla Grandt, Caroline Elmquist-Clausen, Ditte Reder, Jakob Rud, M. P. Rommedahl, Selina Petersen Indholdsfortegnelse Indholdsfortegnelse ........................................................................................................... 1 Figurliste ........................................................................................................................... 5 1. Problemfelt .................................................................................................................... 6 2. Problemformulering ...................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Uddybning af problemformulering.......................................................................... 7 3. Begrebsafklaring og akronymer .................................................................................... 8 4. Videnskabsteori ............................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Videnskabsteoretiske erkendelsesinteresser ............................................................ 9 4.2 Socialkonstruktivisme som videnskabsteori ......................................................... 10 4.3 Projektets ontologi og epistemologi ...................................................................... 12 5. Metode ........................................................................................................................ 15 5.1 Indgangsvinkel ...................................................................................................... 15 5.2 Valg af teori ........................................................................................................... 15 5.2.1 Medieteori ....................................................................................................... 16 5.2.2 Agenda-setting-teori ....................................................................................... 16 5.2.3 Framing-teori .................................................................................................. 17 5.2.4 Magtteori ......................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Valg af empiri ........................................................................................................ 18 5.3.1 Strategi ved indsamling af førstehåndsempiri ................................................ 19 5.3.2 Metodiske begrænsninger i forhold til empiri ................................................ 21 5.4 Kildekritik ............................................................................................................. 21 5.4.1 Brug af statistik ............................................................................................... 21 5.5 Tværfaglighed ....................................................................................................... 21 6. Teori ............................................................................................................................ 23 Side 1 af 94 Roskilde Universitet efterår 2012 Den Samfundsvidenskabelige Bacheloruddannelse, 3. semester Camilla Grandt, Caroline Elmquist-Clausen, Ditte Reder, Jakob Rud, M. P. Rommedahl, Selina Petersen 6.1 Agenda-setting-teori .............................................................................................. 23 6.1.1 Første niveau af agenda-setting ...................................................................... 24 6.1.2 Andet niveau af agenda-setting....................................................................... 24 6.1.3 Opsummering.................................................................................................. 25 6.2 Framing ................................................................................................................. 25 6.2.1 Ækvivalensbaseret framing............................................................................. 26 6.2.2 Vægtet framing ............................................................................................... 27 6.2.3 Tilgængelighedseffekt .................................................................................... 27 6.2.4 Anvendelighedseffekt ..................................................................................... 28 6.2.5 Framing og agenda-setting-teori ..................................................................... 28 6.2.6 Opsummering.................................................................................................. 29 6.3 Magt ....................................................................................................................... 30 6.3.1 De tre magtdimensioner .................................................................................. 30 6.3.2 Beslutningsarena ............................................................................................. 30 6.3.3 Direkte magt ................................................................................................... 31 6.3.4 Indirekte magt ................................................................................................. 31 6.3.5 Bevidsthedskontrollerende magt..................................................................... 31 6.3.6 Oplevede interesser og virkelige interesser .................................................... 32 6.3.7 Udviklingen af den bevidsthedskontrollerende magt ..................................... 33 6.3.8 Opsummering.................................................................................................. 35 7. Baggrundsviden .......................................................................................................... 36 7.1 Sundhedsreformen ................................................................................................. 36 7.2 Racisme og racesyn blandt amerikanske borgere .................................................. 38 7.3 Fox News ............................................................................................................... 39 7.4 Kritik af Fox News ................................................................................................ 40 8. Analyse ........................................................................................................................ 42 Side 2 af 94 Roskilde Universitet efterår 2012 Den Samfundsvidenskabelige Bacheloruddannelse, 3. semester Camilla Grandt, Caroline Elmquist-Clausen, Ditte Reder, Jakob Rud, M. P. Rommedahl, Selina Petersen 8.1 Agenda-setting-analyse ......................................................................................... 42 8.1.1 Politikere og politiske repræsentanter............................................................. 42 8.1.1.1 Ensidig dækning ...................................................................................... 43 8.1.1.2 Værtens rolle ........................................................................................... 44 8.1.1.3 Selektiv udvælgelse af repræsentanter .................................................... 46 8.1.1.4 Artikler .................................................................................................... 46 8.1.2 Repræsentanter fra sundhedssektoren ............................................................. 46 8.1.2.1 Dominerende egenskaber ........................................................................ 47 8.1.2.2 Tendenser i nyhedsdækningen ................................................................ 49 8.1.2.3 Interviewpersoner .................................................................................... 49 8.1.2.4 Værtens rolle ........................................................................................... 50 8.1.3 Repræsentanter for amerikanske virksomheder .............................................. 51 8.1.3.1 Ensidig dækning ...................................................................................... 52 8.1.3.2 Favorisering i debatter ............................................................................ 53 8.1.3.3 Demokratiske repræsentanter .................................................................. 54 8.1.4 Diverse ............................................................................................................ 55 8.1.4.1 “Sebelius on ObamaCare and the 2012 Election”................................... 56 8.1.4.2 “Is bad news on ObamaCare good political news for Obama?” ............. 57 8.1.4.3 “The president's ObamaCare victory speech - a translation” .................. 58 8.1.4.4 “Doctor seeking Illinois Senate seat offers brutal diagnosis of ObamaCare in viral video”.................................................................................. 58 8.1.4.5 “Doctor loses job for opposing ObamaCare?” ........................................ 59 8.1.4.6 “Most Americans expect ObamaCare to eventually be implemented, poll says” .................................................................................................................... 59 8.1.5 Sammenkobling .............................................................................................. 60 8.1.6 Delkonklusion ................................................................................................. 62 Side 3 af 94 Roskilde Universitet efterår 2012 Den Samfundsvidenskabelige Bacheloruddannelse, 3. semester Camilla Grandt, Caroline Elmquist-Clausen, Ditte Reder, Jakob Rud, M. P. Rommedahl,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    94 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us