Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development : SATREPS Subduction Zone and Earthquake Sources in Peru International Symposium on Earthquake & Tsunami Disaster Reduction -Learning from the Great East Japan Earthquake– Earthquake Engineering Research in Peru and SATREPS Pro jec t Marc h 15, 2012 Carlos ZAVALA Professor, National University of Engineering, UNI, Peru. 2 1 Scenario Earthquakes Location of Earthquake 1746 (Mw=8.6) and hepicenters 1868 (Mw=8.8) that produce tiitsunami in Perú 4 3 SOIL EXPLORATION STUDY CASE LA MOLINA DISTRICT SAN JUAN DE LURIGANCHO DISTRICT 5 6 SOIL EXPLORATION AND PREVIOUS INFORMATION MICROTREMOR MEASUREMENT RECOPILADOS APESEG (2002) RECOPILADOS 2010 CALICATAS EJECUTADAS 2010 POZOS RECOPILADOS SEDAPAL 2010 POZOS RECOPILADOS (1997) GEODAS-10 Microtremor SATREPS ppjroject 7 8 MICROTREMOR MEASURE POINTS AND PREVIOUS MICROTREMOR RECORDS INFORMATION Espectral Ratios using Nakamura´s Method RECOPILADOS MARTINEZ (1997) RECOPILADOS APESEG (2002) EJECUTADOS CISMID (2010) 9 10 PACHACAMAC SOILLEYENDA CLASIFICATION ZoneZONA I: ESTRATOS Hard soilDE GRAVA rock DE ORIGEN COLUVIAL Y/O ALUVIAL ZoneZONA II: SUELOS Sand FINOS soil Y ARENOSOS with 10 CON m ESPESOR depth MENOR A 10 m. VILLA ZoneZONAMARIA III: SUELOS Sand DEL FINOS soil Y ARENOSOS with 10 DE to10 m 20 A 20 m. DE depth ESPESOR TRIUNFO ZoneZONA IV: SUELOS Sand FINOS soil Y ARENOSOS very depth DE GRAN and POTENCIA unstable Y TALUDES slopes INESTABLES 11 12 Maximum Accelerations in La Molina (PGA) SAN JUAN DE LURIGANCHO DISTRICT STUDY BLOCKS AND MATERIALS Study Block Yes Masonry NO Concrete Steel Wood 2 Adobe PGA (cm/s ) Other 13 14 Maximum Accelerations in San Juan de Lurigancho (PGA) The Truth of the Buildings in Peru 30% Engineering constructions 70% Non Engineering constructions 15 16 Urban Inventory District Sector SECTOR 4 SECTOR 3 SECTOR 5 SECTOR 9 SECT OR 2 SECTOR 8 SECT OR 1 SECTOR 6 SECTOR 10 SECTOR 7 SECTOR 11 SECTOR 24 SECTOR 23 SECTOR 12 SECTOR 13 SECTOR 15 SECTOR 14 SECTOR 21 SECTOR 22 SECTOR 20 SECTOR 16 SECTOR 17 SECTOR 19 SECTOR 18 17 18 DATA base ggyeneration & Field Survey Geospatial DATABASE 19 20 Seismic Risk Evaluation Seismic Risk Evaluation • Take plaster of walls S/. • Put wire mesh S/. • Put new plasterS/. • Paint S/. __________________ Retrofitting Cost Building Earthquake damage Building Damage Level Fundamental Period T= 0.07 Np (1+ 0.75. Z. g/981) Retroffiting Cost = Function (Structure Type, PGA, Damage level) Sa = Aceleración on Microzone w= 2/T Sd= Sa /w2 Urban e= Sd H =drift ItInventory Seismic Microzoning i=e x (0.75 R) Vulnerability = FR*i Laboratoty Test 21 22 USING DAMAGE MATRIX AND PARAMETERS FROM 6 DISTRICT STUDY A RATRIO DAMAGE LEVEL AND RETRIFFTING COST WAS DEVELOPED Seismic Risk scenario on La Molina 285000 286000 287000 288000 289000 290000 291000 292000 293000 294000 295000 296000 SANTA ANITA Proyecto CISMID-PGT-BID EL AGUSTINO Di strito Lo te s/ Mz a Area Lo te Prom(m 2) Re posición (US$/m2) ATE VITARTE 8666000 8666000 SAN JU A N DE LURIGANCHO 20 130 275 COMAS 18 160 300 CIENEGUILLA PUENTE PIEDRA 18 160 235 8665000 8665000 VI LLA EL SALVADOR 20 130 400 CHORRILLOS 18 160 950 664000 664000 LA MO LIN A 18 250 1300 88 88 8663000 8663000 LA MOLINA 8662000 8662000 SAN BORJA SANTIAGO DE SURCO PACHACAMAC lectual CISMID. erá utilizarse para el proyecto motivo del contrato, contrato, del motivo proyecto el para utilizarse erá 00 00 ee bb Costo de Reparación 86610 Retrofitting cost 86610 < 15% ® 15% - 30% 30% - 60% 8660000 8660000 arte del poseedor de los derechos de propiedad int de propiedad los derechos de poseedor arte del te, cuyo nombre aparece en el membrete y solo de solo y membrete el en aparece nombre cuyo te, pp nn 60% - 85% SAN JUAN DE MIRAFLORES > 85% VILLA MARIA DEL TRIUNFO 285000 286000 287000 288000 289000 290000 291000 292000 293000 294000 295000 296000 Metros 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 permitidos bajo expresa comunicación escrita por por expresa escrita comunicación bajo permitidos parado por CISMID y es para uso exclusivo del clie del uso exclusivo para y CISMID es por parado nn PROYECTO: PELIGRO SÍSMICO ee REV. Nº FECHA DESCRIPCIÓN DIBUJO REVISIÓN APROBACIÓN ESTUDIO DE MICROZONIFICACIÓN Y MAPA Nº UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE INGENIERÍA PAÍS: PERÚ VULNERABILIDAD SÍSMICA EN 1 Jul. 2010 Levantamiento de datos Jenny Taira Dr. Miguel Estrada Dr. Carlos Zavala FACULTAD DE INGENIERÍA CIVIL DEPARTAMENTO: LIMA LA CIUDAD DE LIMA CENTRO PERUANO JAPONÉS DE INVESTIGACIONES PROVINCIA: E-09 LIMA SÍSMICAS Y MITIGACIÓN DE DESASTRES DISTRITO: LA MOLINA Costo Reparación en La Molina 23 Este plano es emitido ypr otros usossolamente será 24 Seismic Risk scenario on San Juan de Lurigancho SATREPS OUTPUTS RELATED WITH APPLICATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT Retrofitting cost 25 26 Seismometer implemetation on SATREPS Project 27 28 29 30 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING ITK-06 JAPAN-PERU CENTER FOR EARTHQUAKE Capture Signal at Structural Lab ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND DISASTER MITIGATION - CISMID CISMID-FIC-UNI ITK Sensor Monitoring Network CISMID-FIC-UNI ITK-06 IP-Sensor 16/09/2011 -16:50 hrs 6.000 4.000 ITK-P01 ITK-P02 2.000 n (cm/seg2) 0.000 NS oo 1 EW -2.000 1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 10001 11001 12001 13001 14001 15001 16001 17001 UD Acelerati -4.000 CISMID-FIC-UNI ITK-06 IP-Sensor -6.000 13/07/2011 -05:07 hrs 10 8 ITK-P03 ITK-06 ) 6 4 2 NS 0 EW tion (cm/seg2 tion 19:03:22 19:04:48 19:06:14 19:07:41 19:09:07 19:10:34 19:12:00 UD aa -2 -4 Aceler -6 -8 -10 Time 31 32 Proposal Location Sensor Working Wave Propagation arrival simulation to Peruvian Costal areas on 11/3/2011 Tohoku Tsunami LOW DUCTILITY WALL TEST 33 34 MSc. Bruno Adriano LOW DUCTILITY WALL TEST CONCLUSIONS • Some of the outputs reached in the second year of Japan ADQUISITION SENSORS FOR MEASURING CH‐NUMBER RANGE TIPO UNIT ORIGIN Peru SATREPS project were presented. CH‐025ACT. 25t/4755µ T AXIAL LOAD CH‐150JACK ATFEEDBACK HORIZONTAL LOAD‐A CH‐250JACK BTFEEDBACK HORIZONTAL LOAD‐B CISMID/FIC/UNI-JICA SATREPS Project • Two districts of Lima city, La Molina and San Juan de CH‐3 100 CDP mm HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT SOUTH CH‐4 100 CDP mm HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT NORTH Low ductility concrete wall - Wall 02 CH‐5 50 CDP mm HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT EAST H/2 18/02/2012 Lurigancho were investigated and diagnosis of the seismic CH‐650CDPmmHORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT WEST H/2 CH‐730CDPmmHORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT EAST H/6 500 CH‐830CDPmmHORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT WEST H/6 CH‐930CDPmmVERTICAL DISPLACEMENT EAST H/6 400 risk was performed in terms of retrofitting cost. CH‐10 30 CDP mm VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT WEST H/6 CH‐11 50 KY 2794µ/FS mm DIAGONAL DISPLACEMENT EAST 300 CH‐12 50 KY 2819µ/FS mm DIAGONAL DISPLACEMENT WEST • Geospatial data base has been generated of the stock of CH‐13 30 KY mm HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT EAST H/6 CENTER 200 CH‐14 30 KY mm HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT WEST H/6 CENTER CH‐15 10 CDP mm HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT EAST BOTTON BASE 100 buildings was produced in order to evaluate the vulnerability CH‐16 50 CDP mm VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT WEST CH‐17 50 CDP mm VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT WEST 0-2.185, 7.25 CH‐18 50 CDP mm VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT EAST of the structural systems in the zone. CH‐19 50 CDP mm VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT EAST -20 Shear (kN) -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 ee CH‐20‐ST 07 2000 gage factor 2.08 µ EAST ɸ 1/2 BORDES -100 CH‐21‐ST 08 2000 gage factor 2.08 µ EAST ɸ MALLA DE MURO Bas CH‐22‐ST 09 2000 gage factor 2.08 µ EAST ɸ MALLA DE CIMENTACION -200 • Geotechnical microzonification was performed to produce the CH‐23‐ST 10 2000 gage factor 2.08 µ WEST ɸ MALLA DE CIMENTACION CH‐24‐ST 11 2000 gage factor 2.08 µ WEST ɸ MALLA DE MURO -300 CH‐25‐ST 12 2000 gage factor 2.08 µ WEST ɸ 1/2 BORDES soil characterization of the area and the maximum -400 CONTROL SENSORS FOR DRIVE JACKS ON CONTROLLER -500 acceltilerations tha t can beaffec ted the dis tr ic ts. CH‐MONITOR RANGE TIPO UNIT ORIGIN Displacement (mm) CH‐150JACK ATFEEDBACK HORIZONTAL LOAD‐A CH‐2 100 CDP mm JACK CONTROL MASTER CH‐350JACK BTFEEDBACK HORIZONTAL LOAD‐B • An introduction of the socio economical parameter is CH‐4 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ introduce in the determination of the seismic risk producing 35 different functions for the diagnosis. 36.