Ecology of Coral Reef Fishes

Ecology of Coral Reef Fishes

RESULTS OF THE TEKTITE PROGRAM: ECOLOGY OF CORAL REEF FISHES BRUCE B. COLLETTE and SYLVIA A. EARLE, Editors NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCIENCE BULLETIN 14 0 OCTOBER 30, 1972 1972 RESULTS OF THE TEKTITE PROGRAM 71 OBSERVATIONS ON CLEANER SHRIMPS OF THE GENUS PERICLIMENES By CONRAD MAHNKEN CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 72 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA .......................................................................................... 72 PHYSICAL FEATURES AND TYPE OF BOTTOM .................................................................. 72 BARTHOLOMEA ANNULATA AND ITS ASSOCIATES ...................................................... 74 ANEMONE DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................................................ 75 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF PERICLIMENES PEDERSONI AND P. YUCATANICUS ...... .. ........................................................................................................ 75 POPULATION SIZE OF PERICL1MENES PEDERSONI AND P. YUCATANICUS ON MARKED ANEMONES .............................................................................................................. 78 CLEANING BEHAVIOR AND SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING OF PER1CLIMENES PEDERSONI ........................................................................................................ Si SPECULATIONS ON THE EVOLUTION OF CLEANING BEHAVIOR .............................. 82 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 83 ABSTRACT: Diving teams studied the distribution of anemones and com- mensal fish cleaning shrimps with relation to major reef and sand flat features during Tektite I. The most abundant shrimp was Periclimenes pedersoni Chace. followed by P. yucatanicas (Ives). Both species were almost invariably associated with the anemone Bartholomea annulata. Physiognomic features observed as representing different environments were: back reef; back reef re-entrant or canyon; reef front; unvegetated sand strip, an area at the base of the reef grazed clean by fishes; and algal plain, an area of scattered boulders and sparse vegetation. The anemone B. annniata was about equally abundant in all five habitat types, but the number of shrimps per anemone varied from lowest on the reef front for both species to highest on the sand strip for P. pedersoni and highest on the algal plain for P. yucatanicus. Variation in abundance of P. pedersom between survey areas is believed to be less related to physical habitat than to the opportunity for meeting fish "clients." Not only is the sand strip the major corridor for fish movement along the reef, but the shrimp-anemone complex is more readily visible to potential fish hosts in the open, unvegetated sand strip. No competitive exclusion was evident between the two species of Pericli- menes, both shrimps frequently occurring together on the same anemone. P. pedersoni populations on 23 anemone stations in the unvegetated sand strip were monitored seven times. The notion that Periclirnenes is territorial and remains for extended periods within a meter or less of the same spot was not borne out, for significant variation (P = .05) in shrimp populations on individual anemones as well as in total populations did occur between surveys. • iNational Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisher- ies Center, Seattle, Washington 98102 72 BULLETIN OF THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY No. 14 There was no significant difference in individual length of shrimp in popula- tions between surveys (P .05). The relatively low abundance of P. peder- soni in all but the sand strip area and the significant variation in population size with time suggests that the movements in the population that do occur are confined primarily to the unvegetated sand strip, INTRODUCTION Physical features and type of bottom A symbiotic cleaning behavior exists between The distribution and abundance of Periciimenes certain brightly colored tropical shrimps of the was surveyed in five distinct physiognomic reef areas that I believed to be different ecological zones genus Periciimenes and cooperating reef fishes. The (Fig. 39), all within easy swimming distance of the shrimps, which are almost invariably associated Tektite Habitat. Anemones and associated shrimp with an anemone, have been observed to pick and were completely enumerated within each zone at eat parasites, injured tissue, and other particles least once during the study. from a variety of fishes. These shrimps are highly The back reef plot is located in relatively shallow specialized, and largely dependent upon cleaning water between the Tektite Habitat and the bedrock for their food (Limbaugh, 1961; Limbaugh et al.. outcrop along the beach. It extends 65 m across the 1961). The shrimps may remain stationed on or reef in a narrow 3.3 m corridor that intersects sev- near an anemone for a long time, attracting fishes eral canyons or re-entrants running normal to the by their brilliant colors, conspicuous patterns, and transect, but in general is constant in depth at 13 m. their actions (Feder. 1966). Throughout the back reef are scattered coral boul- "Cleaners" are key organisms in many commu- ders, rubble, profuse stands of alcyonarians, ex- nity ecosystems. Their activity may play a major posed areas of carbonate sand, and a diverse fauna role in the well being of many species of reef fishes. of actively growing hard corals corresponding in Since many important food fishes may be largely species composition to the "cervicornis" zone of dependent on the outcome of cleaning for their Goreau (1959). The plot terminates to the seaward health, and possibly in some instances for their where the reef face breaks and falls away rapidly continued existence, the economic value of cleaners to the sand-algal plain at a depth of 17 m. may be great (Feder, 1966). The present study The canyon (survey plot #2) is the same north- indicates that the abundance of such reef fishes in south re-entrant in which the Tektite Habitat was the Virgin Islands may be indirectly related to the located, Near Tektite the canyon was steep-sided occurrence of the anemone, Bartholomea annul= and distinct, rising 1 or 2 m above the canyon floor. ( LeSueur), to which cling the two most abundant At the south end it became diffuse and ill-defined. shrimps. the Pederson cleaning shrimp Periclimenes coalescing with the open sand areas of the back pedersoni Chace and the spotted cleaner P. yuca- reef. Moderate numbers of herbivorous fishes tanicus (Ives). Observations on cleaning by fishes grazed this corridor, keeping it clean of algae. in the area around the Habitat are noted by Col- The deeper parts of the seaward reef front (sur- lette and Talbot (this volume). vey plot #3) are typical of deep Caribbean reefs The importance of such symbiotic behavior was as described by Goreau (1959) except for the tack not recognized until diving equipment and tech- of an intermediate buttress zone and a shallow niques allowed biologists to observe undersea life stand of Acropora palmata, presumably because of directly. The duration of such observations were the low energy sea condition that prevails in Lame- significantly extended with the recent advent of sat- shur Bay. The steep reef face is typified by Monras- uration diving techniques. Saturation diving from rrea annularis, the primary hermatypic species, but manned underwater laboratories, such as the Tek- no single species of hard coral is clearly dominant. tite Habitat, has largely eliminated the restraints Seaward of the reef wall, lie the extensive sand imposed by depth and time on conventional flats that occupy the major portion of Lameshur SCUBA methods and afforded many advantages Bay (survey plot #5). The primary vegetation on for prolonged underwater studies. In the present the plain is Thalassia, Udorea, and Syringodium, field study, conduited from the Tektite Habitat sprinkled with patches of forms such as Pen icillus during Tektite I (Febntary 15-April 15, 1969), the and Halimeda (see also Earle, this volume). An distribution and abundance of both cleaner shrimp unvegetated sand strip (survey area #4) averaging and host anemones were investigated. 10 m wide separates the reef from the grass and algae covered plain. DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA This band of bare sand between inshore fringing 1972 RESULTS OF THE TEKTITE PROGRAM 73 reef and offshore beds of marine vegetation is a ing activity of herbivorous reef fishes, and width of persistent and important bottom feature in the Vir- the strip probably coincides with the maximum dis- gin Islands. Using aerial photographs, Kumpf and tance that these fish will venture from shelter of the Randall (1961) were able to delineate the sand reef (Randall, 1965). The bare sand zone is also strip along more than one-half of the total 58-mile seen as concentric bands around patch reefs. Ran- coastline of St. John and nearby islets. dall noted that sharpness of the seaward border of The unvegetated sand strip results from the graz- the sand strip was most distinct where the reef is -=---- . .1.. - - ----ia- _.,--__m___ -- - - ---, '-- - --7"'-----a=— ..-- ---341.--k._- --=..-- - -.. - Coral reef --._..i.,_ .-..c._ -a_ — - - „&-- _ -...=---- -- _ 3127--1----- —- ...,--.---__.,,------_ Ej Carbonate sand =. ..._ —=3.7 .-- -7S.- - :---- = — _I — -- Algal flat • Survey anemones -- - 1 0m FIGURE 39. Location of Tektite Habitat, survey anemones and five survey plots. 74 BULLETIN

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us