Starz Negotiations Update Document August 2012

Starz Negotiations Update Document August 2012

Starz Negotiations Update Document August 2012 CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney-Client Communication page 2 Landscape Summary 1. Sellers: Little direct competition from other studios at present. Disney is only a partial competitor. Universal is exploring but is likely to renew with HBO. Over the next two years, Paramount (if EPIX fails) and Fox may be shopping. 2. Buyers: EPIX: Interested in Sony, but they don’t have DirecTV carriage that they were hoping to get by way of a Viacom lawsuit. They may be in trouble. We would like to nail down a pay deal before EPIX implodes and floods the market HBO: Would be willing to talk to us if Universal falls thru, but that could take a year to determine. If Universal wants in, they will likely renew with Universal because they need carriage on Comcast Comcast: Interested in talking; need to be educated; not clear if they’d actually do the deal or if they are just fishing for market information Netflix: Interested in Columbia titles, less interest in Classics and Screen Gems titles Amazon/Hulu: Interest in a subset of pictures. Not clear to them what impact this will have on their subscribers / viewers so it may be difficult for them to know how to value the product for lack of experience. Expect some feedback in the next few weeks Showtime: Interest in Screen Gems and perhaps a portion of Columbia slate DirecTV: Interested in exploring a shared output deal, e.g., where DirecTV takes a window after Pay1, shared with another linear or SVOD service We could end up splitting the slate 3 ways (Netflix, Showtime, Hulu/Amazon) based on the current buyer landscape, but it’s still too early to tell CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication page 3 Shared Output Deals: Potential Structures Scenario Description Pay 1 Network Pay 2 Network Pay 3 1 Starz Only (possible) 2 Linear/SVOD Share Output (last 6 months) 3 Linear/SVOD Share Output (post 90 days) (delay TBD) 4 New STB, SVOD, OTT 5 SVOD Split Slate (Col; SG; SPA) (Col; SG; SPA) (SPC) (SPC) 6 Linear/SVOD Split Slate (some Columbia/SG) (some Columbia/SG) (Col; SG; SPA) (Col; SG; SPA) (SPC) (SPC) CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication page 4 Action Plan • Take advantage of multiple interested parties in the market and limited competition from other studios to move deliberately towards a new deal • Gather specific proposals/bids on pricing and rights requirements from all parties • Engage Starz on stand-alone issues (UV, DRM modifications) to slow the discussion until we have market intelligence with which to respond to their offer • Aim to have proposal back to Starz in September with an ability to move quickly to closure with the party/parties we have identified CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication page 5 APPENDIX CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication page 6 Buyers Landscape – Detail Subscribers • Starz: 19.6 million • Largest footprint/exposure • Comparable footprint/exposure to Starz • Comparable footprint/exposure to • Encore: 35 million • HBO: 28.4 million, 44 million int’l • Showtime: 21.3 million Starz but will grow if gets MSO • Cinemax: 17 million • The Movie Channel (TMC): N/A, carriage packaged with Showtime. ala carte with • 2011: 9.8 million (MSOs) DirecTV and Dish • Content also available to 23M Netflix subscribers Current Studios / • Sony (2016), Disney (2015), • Fox (2017, believed to have • IFC, Weinstein (2015), Miramax, • Paramount, MGM, Lions Gate Deal Timing Overture extended to 2019), Warner Bros. Dimension, DreamWorks SKG (2015) (est. thru 2015, based on Netflix (sister co.), Universal (2016), deal timing) Summit (2017) Financial Stability • Strong • Strong • Strong • Uncertain (Launched in 2009) • 2011: Revenue – $1.6B, Cash • 2011: Revenue – $4.1B, Cash Flow • 2011: Revenue – $1.5B, Cash Flow – • 2011: Revenue – $406M, Cash Flow – $362M – $1.3B $607M Flow – $123M (large portion assumed from Netflix deal) Movie Output • Seeks 2 studios only • Probably not a buyer for Sony; may • Expressed interest in a small (e.g., • Movies from JV partners Strategy / Buyer • Pays strongest pricing in pay drop from 3 to 2 studios if Universal Screen Gems) portion of SPE’s slate as • Liquidity concerns and LT viability Profile market on more reasonable terms leaves; legal issues if tried for 4 other deals lapse in question than HBO studios • Studio output agreements have become • Due to limited carriage and • In discussions with Amazon and • Fees less attractive than Starz less relevant (lost Paramount, MGM, LG fewer feeds than the other pay Redbox/Verizon for a potential • Requires onerous holdbacks and Summit) as shifted to originals channels (8 for EPIX vs. 16 for OTT partnership impacting EST/UV and cable FOD • Pays low prices for film and therefore Starz) they put more titles on buys in the low end market SVOD than the other services • Demanding OTT rights on all deals (3,000) without an articulated growth strategy Ownership • Liberty Media • Time Warner • CBS Corporation • Paramount/Viacom, MGM and Lions Gate Growth Strategy • Aims for original programming but • Leader in original programming • Heavy investment in original TV • Carriage on Cox, FiOS and Dish, limited success • HBO GO/Max GO are their programming ~$600M, paying off based including an authenticated SVOD • Has been willing to grow with low authenticated online video portals, on increased Emmy wins/nominations platform (epixhd.com) and OTT margin over-the-top SVOD in the preserving branding and driving • Showtime Anytime is authenticated app via Netflix (they say they’ll have past value to cable (~HBO GO) driving value to cable another OTT service soon) • Now seeking a low-margin SVOD • OTT strategy is undefined • 5 year deal with Netflix for $1 OTT strategy for Encore and high- billion (Sept 2010-2015) with priced SVOD for Starz/Pay1 exclusive window for cable • Launching apps for authenticated viewing CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication page 7 Buyers Landscape – Detail (Cont’d) Subscribers • 23 million • 1.5 million • 8-10 million overall instant • N/A (partnership announced video subs 2/2012) Current Studios / • DreamWorks Animation (begins in • Library only (Crackle, Criterion, • Library only • In discussions with Starz and Deal Timing 2013), EPIX (est. through 2015), Film Lifetime MOWs) EPIX on potential deals District, Relativity, Open Road, Miramax Financial Stability • Moderate? • Moderate • Strong • Moderate • 2011: Revenue – $3.2B, Cash Flow – • 2011: Revenue – $420M $226M Movie Output • Netflix entered premium pay space • No output strategy (library only) to • No output strategy (library • Untested Strategy / Buyer with Starz (deal expired) date only) to date • No SVOD purchasing to date Profile • Signed premium EPIX ($1B) and • Intends to spend $500M in 2012 on • Potentially willing to Relativity deals; appetite for catalog content (no split between TV/film) contemplate an output deal diminishing • Pursuing original production (unknown timing) • Potentially willing to contemplate • Known to pay low prices for another output deal (unknown timing) film and TV product for all or part of SPE’s output (e.g., a window share for SPC) • Heavy TV buyer, perhaps limited feature buyer • Rights package may be favorable to SPE i.e., flexible partner • Pursuing original production Ownership • Publicly traded • NBC/Comcast, FOX, ABC, • Publicly traded • Verizon:65%, Redbox Providence Equity (Subsidiary of Coinstar): 35% Growth Strategy • Looking to become a cable channel • Hulu Plus, for premium content • Potential to spin SVOD • Redbox moving away from like HBO allows for dual revenue stream service out of Prime hard DVD business to online • Seeking carriage on MSOs model • SVOD service may help model similar to Netflix • Expansion across multiple devices • UK and Japan with Kindle sales (or vice- and into int’l territories versa) • May strike additional deals with premium Pay TV providers/studios for content CONFIDENTIAL – Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication page 8 Buyers Landscape – Detail (Cont’d) Xfinity StreamPix Subscribers • Footprint/exposure comparable to • Footprint/exposure comparable to • N/A [12million?] • +90M total accounts Starz Starz • FOD service only available • ~12-18M active worldwide • Potentially available to 22 million • 19.2 million on Time Warner Cable and accounts Comcast Xfinity subs Bright House Networks • ~5-7M U.S. accounts • Also affiliated with Comcast and Cox Current Studios / • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A Deal Timing Financial Stability • Uncertain (large parent company) • Strong • Uncertain • Strong • 2011: Revenue – $27.2B, Net Income – $2.6B Movie Output • Rumors of a pay deal with Universal • Unknown whether DTV plans to shift • No output strategy (library • No SVOD purchasing to date Strategy / Buyer • No proven output strategy (library from carrying Pay TV channels on its only) to date • Currently an a la carte Profile only) to date service to buying content directly from • Any commitment to movie service where customers can studios and launching their own output deal would require purchase/rent films and TV service as a direct competitor full JV board to agree: TW, shows • Potential Internet access hurdle Comcast, Cox, BH Ownership • Comcast • Publicly traded • Comcast, Cox • Sony • Major shareholders include Liberty Communications, Time Media and Warren Buffet Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks Growth Strategy • Launch video streaming service to • Expected to

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us