A Strategy for Economic Development

A Strategy for Economic Development

I LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY H~r~Ii~~~II~~~[~rlilllill~rmllllllllllllllill 3 0307 00052 6189 Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota: A Strategy for Economic Development February 1985 ~"'< ... i~"''. ~,~ MlNNESOTA ~·•.,YDi:partment of Energy and EConomic Development A look at the history of Minnesota reveals a fascinating portrait of an evolving economy. From a time when furs were king and the waterway a road to prosperity, the economy has grown into a modern system exhibiting start­ ling diversity. With components as disparate as agriculture and advertising, computers and tourism, professional sports and heavy industry, Minnesota's economy today contains both evidence of the past and clues to the future. To study that economy is to find a universe of development and growth separating the 1980s from the days of Sibley and Kellogg. Small enclaves of hunters and farmers on the edge of a vast and beautiful wilderness were once the heart of Minnesota's fledgling economy; now the state has evolved into a progressive national leader on the cutting edge of technology. For decades, Minnesotans were able to take evolutionary economic growth largely for granted. Blessed by resources and a hard-working populace, the state prospered. Personal income steadily increased. Unemployment consistently ranked below the national average during periods of na­ tional economic growth and decline. For the Gopher State, it seemed that an inevitably better future would always await. The 1981-82 recession shattered this complacency and il­ luminated the need for an effective growth strategy. Older industries that once formed the bedrock of prosperity are declining. Certain areas of the state are suffering, while others prosper and grow. The residents of Minnesota have entered the 1980s confronting the uncomfortable fact that the state possesses industries and regions in depression, while booming vitality may be only a county, a building, or a street away. Minnesota and the nation are in a new economic era. The old tried and true strategies of the past will not automatically produce new successes. Aggressive action must be taken to ensure a healthy future. What is needed today is a development strategy that is multi-faceted and flexible. It must be able to confront the challenge from other states while dealing with the additional pressures of international competition. To succeed, such a strategy must be well defined and carefully thought through. This report is designed to help that process. It should not be taken as a final statement on the subject. Rather, it is an attempt to describe what is happening in the Minnesota economy and encourage reaction to and discussion about its recommendations. As a result of these reactions and discussions, the Department will submit an updated ver­ sion of this document in January, 1986. ummary This state's economy has experienced The distribution of jobs and income in three significant transformations in the the state is also becoming more concen­ past 125 years. In the mid-19th century trated in a few metropolitan areas, as is lumber was by far the largest industry economic growth. The Twin Cities and allowed the first large-scale ac­ metropolitan area and Rochester have cumulation of capital. As the 20th cen­ prospered, with job and income growth tury progressed agriculture and well above the national average, while agricultural processing rose to pro­ the economy of the rest of the state has minence. During and after World War generally been stagnant since 1977. II, industrialization continued and such Several developments in international sectors as manufacturing and mining trade have serious implications for the rose in importance. Minnesota economy. Imports are Today, as Minnesota moves toward the threatening three of Minnesota's second half of the 1980s, the evolu­ strongest manufacturing industries: in­ tionary process is continuing. For the struments, machinery and fabricated fourth time in its history, this state is metals. Although Minnesota remains a experiencing a major economic transi­ net exporter of these commodities, im­ tion. For some sectors, it is a welcome ports into the U.S. are growing faster change, opening the doors to prosperity than state exports and could dominate and growth. For others, however, it is these sectors by the 1990s. an ill wind that signals a dangerous Imports of foreign steel, iron ore and future. Although the outcome of this automobiles continue to weaken the de­ transition is far from certain, several mand for taconite, causing a crisis in clear trends can be identified. the economy of northeastern Minnesota. Employment in some manufacturing in­ Severe competitive pressures on the ex­ dustries and mining is dropping, while port of Minnesota commodities to world the long decline in agriculture and markets are contributing to the serious agricultural processing continues. problems facing the state's vital However, the state is demonstrating agricultural sector. surprising growth in several manufac­ When studied closely, the recent trends turing industries that are stagnant or in the Minnesota economy reveal declining nationally. These include reasons for both optimism and concern. machinery manufacturing, fabricated Some signs of strength: metals, and printing and publishing. • Minnesota has had exceptional Minnesota's instruments manufacturing growth in several manufacturing in­ industry is growing at three times the dustries, far outstripping the nation. national rate. • Minnesota is increasingly a national Minnesota is paralleling the national education, health care, finance and shift toward service employment, with insurance center. more than one of every three new jobs • The state is maintaining a high con­ now being created found in the service centration of professional, technical sector. But it is also unique in the rate and craft workers, given the in­ of its shift toward non-production dustry mix. employment-which includes manage­ However, a great deal of concern must ment, clerical and engineering jobs-and be directed toward other ominous in its concentration of white collar pro­ developments: fessional and technical jobs. Together, • While employment and income is these trends are creating a more skewed growing rapidly in the Twin Cities income distribution with jobs increas­ and Rochester metropolitan areas, ingly clustered at the high and low ends the economy of the rest of state is of the wage scale. much more stagnant. 2 • Employment in Minnesota is becom­ ing increasingly clustered in high and low wage jobs. • The low wage structure of the ex­ panding service industry is dampen­ ing total wage growth. • Agricultural, food processing and mining industries are declining. • Imports are encroaching on the markets of several manufacturing growth industries. It is imperative to understand these trends and to develop policies that capitalize on economic strengths. A climate must be developed that nurtures strongly performing manufacturing in­ dustries, especially the high growth in­ struments, printing and publishing, fabricated metals, non-electrical machinery, and clay and glass products industries. Policies that will encourage growth of high wage occupations and address the The economic contrast loss of moderate wage occupations and between the Twin Cities­ increasing concentration of workers in Rochester metropolitan low paying jobs must be promoted. It is areas and rural Minnesota not enough to create any job; the con­ is striking-and a cause centration must be on creating employ­ for concern. ment which pays a living wage and has potential for growth. The importance of the agricultural and food processing industries must be recognized. There is no more serious economic issue facing the state than the decline of these sectors. The reasons for the decline must be identified and vigorous action taken to stabilize the situation to the largest degree possible. The growing disparity in economic health between the Twin Cities­ Rochester metropolitan areas and the rest of the state must also be addressed. The current economic transition is not complete and the outcome is uncertain, yet on one point there is no debate. Min­ nesota brings to the situation the characterics it has displayed throughout the years: an abundance of natural resources and a creative, productive workforce. The future hinges on how these assets are used. 3 Throughout the state's history, agriculture and ag-related industries have played a vital role in the economy. 4 the innesota Since Minnesota's admission to the Union in 1857, its economy has evolved from a primarily rural base to a more urban and technical system. The early economy was based on natural resources, the "natural capital" with which the state was blessed by nature. Indeed, much of the founda­ tion on which Minnesota has grown was built from resources that existed for thousands of years before the state was settled. Furs, lumber, the fertile soil and the ore beneath it-all played critical roles in the development of the state. Today, although many of Minnesota's industries are still based on local natural resources-agriculture, food process­ ing, mining, paper manufacturing, tourism-new industries have risen to fill the additional needs of a modern economy. Computer equipment, computer-based business services, printing and publishing, and other professional services have become the fastest growing sectors of the Minnesota economy. 5 The white pine, strong, light in weight. Ear Iy growth easy to cut, slow to decay, is a marvelously versatile wood that Accompanying and stimulating the attracted the attention of numerous state's early development was a rapid entrepreneurs. Often growing to a rise in population. From 40,000 in 1855, height of 160 feet with a diameter of 30 the population jumped to 150,000 two inches or more, white pines were found years later, and to 439,000 in 1870. In a in every Minnesota county east of the pattern that was to be repeated often, Mississippi.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    65 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us