1997 Interim Report on the APVA Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia Nicholas Luccketti Beverly Straube October 1998 Graphics and maps by Jamie E. May Design and production by Elliott Jordan © 1998 by The Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this report or portions thereof in any form. Contents Acknowledgements....................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ................................. 1 1997 EXCAVATIONS.............................. 3 James Fort ....................................................................... 3 James Town....................................................................10 Early New Town ...........................................................12 Human Burials ..............................................................13 Testing At The Yeardley House .................................15 Offshore Testing...........................................................15 SELECTED ARTIFACTS ...................... 17 Beads ..............................................................................17 Jettons ............................................................................20 Finger Rings...................................................................21 Crucifix ..........................................................................22 Tobacco Pipes...............................................................23 NOTES .................................................. 29 THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF VIRGINIA ANTIQUITIES 204 W Franklin Street, Richmond, VA 23220 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr. William M. Kelso directed the fieldwork in In addition to conducting offshore testing, Wil- 1997, just as he has since the inception of the Asso- liam and Mary geologist Jerre Johnson contributed ciation for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities’ his expertise in procuring lacquer peels and provided (APVA) Jamestown Rediscovery in 1994. The full- geological information about site and its features. time field and laboratory staff consisted of archae- Colonial Williamsburg Foundation vice-president ologists Nicholas Luccketti, Eric Deetz, and Jamie Cary Carson and architectural historians Edward May; curator Beverly Straube, operations manager Chappell, Willie Graham, Carl Lounsbury, and and head conservator Elliott Jordan, and conserva- Mark Wenger all made several site visits to offer their tor Michael Lavin. Seth Mallios, Garrett Fesler, ideas on the archeological remains of Structure 163. Thaddeus Pardue, Danny Schmidt, Martha Gates, William and Mary Center for Archaeological Re- Camille Hedrick, Jason Burroughs, and Darby search archaeologist Dennis Blanton consulted with O’Donnell comprised the part-time field crew. The Jamestown Rediscovery staff on prehistoric findings Jamestown Rediscovery summer field school was on a number of occasions and supplied a field crew managed by Fesler and Mallios. Professional archae- to investigate the prehistoric midden north of the ologists Carter Hudgins and Eric Klingelhofer also church tower under his direction. participated in the fieldwork, while a number of Also, many APVA volunteers provided much ap- archaeologically experienced volunteers assisted in preciated help throughout the year. the field including Michael Westfall, Alastair A major enhancement for visitors to the site in Macdonald, JoAnn Robbins, Bill Stoltz, and Rob- 1997 was the construction of a viewing platform ert Dunkerly. Brad Hemp of the Lafayette High with graphics to enable visitors to get a better un- School mentor program worked as an excavator and derstanding of the site. The platform was made pos- lab technician. Alynne Pilch, an intern from George sible by a grant from James City County. Jamestown Mason University, processed artifacts, and Heather Rediscovery was funded in 1997 by the Virginia Lapham, a University of Virginia doctoral candi- General Assembly, the National Endowment for the date, examined the glass trade beads and assisted in Humanities, the National Geographic Society, and their classification. individual members and branches of the APVA. INTRODUCTION The general plan for the 1997 field season was pit contained copper, Irish pennies, and military to expand the excavation north, east, and south artifacts suggesting that it too was a very early feature. around the southeast bulwark of James Fort to bet- Other objectives of the 1997 field season were ter define the fort plan and to continue the investi- continuing to track the fort trace; testing the east gation of major features encountered in 1996. One palisade, opening the north bulwark area and try- of these features was a slot trench north of the bul- ing to locate the west palisade slot trench. Excava- wark. Running perpendicular to the east curtain, tion of a burial found next to JR102C also was part the slot trench possibly was an extension of the fort. of the plan. Construction of a wing on the Yeardley The excavations continued eastward to follow the House was scheduled for 1997 and necessitated ar- bulwark earthwork trench which had turned 90 de- chaeological testing of the area to be impacted by grees in that direction. South of the bulwark, a large the excavation of the footings. pit was partially uncovered and tested in 1996. The 1 Figure 1: Overhead view of excavations at southeast corner of James Fort showing bulwark trench, Pit 3, Structure 163, possible James Town palisade slot trench, and Burial 2. Site observation deck is in the center. 2 1997 EXCAVATIONS JAMES FORT East Curtain The guide for Jamestown Rediscovery’s excavation The slot trench of the east curtain palisade was of James Fort is a model based principally on Will- identified, but not excavated, in a test trench (JR98) iam Strachey’s description of the fort in 1610. on the north side of the church tower in 1996. The Strachey observed that the fort was: initial excavation showed intact stratigraphy, as did “...cast almost into the forme of a Triangle, and the test trench (JR96) on the south side of the church Pallizadoed. The south side next to the river (how- tower. This confirmed that the area inside the iron beit extended in a line, or Curtaine sixscore foote fence always had been considered churchyard and more in length, then the other two, by reason the never was used agriculturally, thus it never was advantage of the ground doth so require) containes plowed. 140 yards: the West and East sides 100 only. At Excavation of this test trench was expanded in every Angle or corner, where the lines meete, a 1997. A layer of black sandy loam (JR98D) was Bulwarke or Watchtower is raised, and in each encountered between 1’2” and 1’4” below modern Bulwarke a peece of Ordance or two well 1 mounted.” The accuracy of Strachey’s account was verified by previous Jamestown Re- discovery excavations of one-half of the east bulwark and parts of the south and east fort walls which formed an angle that precisely matched the fig- ures described by Strachey.2 Accord- ingly, the southeast corner of the fort was used to project the position of the north end of the east curtain, the north bulwark, and the line of the west curtain of James Fort. Figure 2. Plan of test pits in church yard. 3 grade and thought to be original topsoil. This was been excavated. The archaeological evidence also sealed by a heavy brick bat and brick dust scatter suggests that the palisade posts were extracted not (JR98C) in the west half of the trench, while the too long after they were erected. The dismantling east half was covered by a layer of shell mortar plas- holes not only were sealed by the same layers that ter, and brick (JR98B). Both of these layers were capped the palisade trench, but they were devoid of below root mat and modern topsoil (JR98A). artifacts, indicating that the dismantling holes were Clearly cutting through the original topsoil but dug and filled before any midden accumulated from sealed by JR98B was a narrow trench (JR98L), di- the settlement. rectly on line with the projected path of the east The undisturbed topsoil stratum (JR98D) con- curtain. Part of the trench was obscured by a more tained a large quantity of prehistoric pottery sherds, recent hole (JR98F). The 11” wide trench was ap- mostly Mockley ware and thereby dating to the proximately the same width of the previously exca- Middle Woodland period. Dennis Blanton con- vated palisade trenches and certainly seemed to be ducted the excavation of the unplowed lower A- part of the east curtain palisade. There was, how- horizon (JR98H) in this test trench. His prelimi- ever, some concern with the difficulty of detecting nary observations of the results are as follows: distinct postmolds within the trench. There were “To find traces of activity of this age that survives postmold-like patches of dark loam in the trench, undisturbed by plowing is rare, indeed, anywhere but they changed shape each time the trench was in the Tidewater region. Though directly adjacent troweled down a inch or two. This resulted in a de- to a paling trench for the fort enclosure, the de- cision to examine the trench by digging in from the posit predates the military intrusion by up to 700 side. This method of excavation removed all the years. Pottery sherds in these early layers date pri- subsoil along the west side of the trench, exposing marily to the end of the Middle Woodland period the outside face. Instead of finding the expected clean (Mockley), although an appreciable number are straight edge of the palisade