From Global Village to Identity Tribes: Context Collapse and the Darkest Timeline

From Global Village to Identity Tribes: Context Collapse and the Darkest Timeline

Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2021, Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 16–24 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i3.3930 Article From Global Village to Identity Tribes: Context Collapse and the Darkest Timeline Marco Bastos School of Information and Communication Studies, University College Dublin, Ireland; E‐Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 15 December 2020 | Accepted: 2 May 2021 | Published: 23 July 2021 Abstract In this article we trace the development of two narratives describing social media that informed much of internet schol‐ arship. One draws from McLuhan’s axiom positing that communication networks would bring forth a ‘global village,’ a deliberate contradiction in terms to foreground the seamless integration of villages into a global community. Social media would shrink the world and reshape it into a village by moving information instantaneously from any location at any time. By leveraging network technology, it would further increase the density of connections within and across social commu‐ nities, thereby integrating geographic and cultural areas into a village stretching across the globe. The second narrative comprises a set of metaphors equally inspired by geography but emphasizing instead identity and tribalism as opposed to integration and cooperation. Both narratives are spatially inspired and foreground real‐world consequences, either by supporting cooperation or by ripping apart the fabric of society. They nonetheless offer opposing accounts of commu‐ nication networks: the first is centered on communication and collaboration, and the second highlights polarization and division. The article traces the theoretical and technological developments driving these competing narratives and argues that a digitally enabled global society may in fact reinforce intergroup boundaries and outgroup stereotyping typical of geographically situated communities. Keywords context collapse; disinformation; geography; global village; internet studies; polarization Issue This article is part of the issue “Spaces, Places, and Geographies of Public Spheres” edited by Annie Waldherr (University of Vienna, Austria), Ulrike Klinger (European University Viadrina, Germany) and Barbara Pfetsch (Freie Universität Berlin, Germany / Weizenbaum‐Institute for the Networked Society, Germany). © 2021 by the author; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu‐ tion 4.0 International License (CC BY). 1. Introduction ogy enhanced the physical and nervous systems of individuals and increased their information processing For all the undoubted emphasis in literary criticism capacity (Carey, 1967). The second axiom, a footnote and communication theory associated with the Toronto to Innis’ observations on the psychic and social conse‐ School of Communication, it also offered a spatial quences of communication, asserted that the medium research program with lasting impact on internet stud‐ was itself the message because the meaning of a mes‐ ies. This stream of research was distinctly developed sage was ultimately affected by the symbiotic relation‐ in the works of Eric Havelock and Harold Innis, the ship between the medium and the content being com‐ latter of whom offered an intensely geographic explo‐ municated (McLuhan, 1962). ration of communication networks (Barnes, 1993; Innis, But it was the third axiom, a deeply geographic 2007). It also transpired in the late work of Marshall metaphor, that resonated with those envisaging global McLuhan that came to be associated with the school, networks: communication networks would bring forth particularly the axiomata about the media. McLuhan’s a ‘global village,’ purposely coined as a contradiction in first axiom was neither spatial nor political and stated terms foregrounding the seamless integration of villages that mass media were extensions of man, as technol‐ into a global community. Electronic media would shrink Media and Communication, 2021, Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 16–24 16 the world and reshape it into a single village by mov‐ ogy (Cairncross, 1997). This narrative gained currency ing information instantaneously from any location on the in the emerging field of internet studies even if studies planet at the same time. Network and telecommunica‐ continued to report that geographic proximity remained tion technologies would increase the density of connec‐ a critical factor in building relationships and that the tions within and across social groups, thereby integrating negative impacts of distance on cooperation were only geographic and cultural areas into a village that stretched partially mitigated by network technology (Kiesler & across the globe (McLuhan, 1964). In short, global net‐ Cummings, 2002). work infrastructure would change the balance between In other words, the term global village epitomized communication and spatial distance and put into effect the shrinking of the world into one village through the McLuhan’s vision of a global village. use of social and digital media. Since its prescient for‐ Another narrative, largely opposed to the notion of a mulation by McLuhan (1964), the metaphor was popu‐ global village, emerged in the late 2010s and influenced larized to explain the internet, where physical distance much of the recent internet scholarship. It was built is even less of a constrain on the communication activ‐ on reports of extensive filter bubbles, echo‐chamber ity of users. boyd (2008) argued that the global village communication, and the widespread balkanization of metaphor continues to describe effectively how digital internet communities (Flaxman et al., 2016; Fletcher communication empowers personal relationships across & Nielsen, 2017; Pariser, 2012; Tucker et al., 2018). vast geographic and cultural differences. In this alterna‐ The prevalence of this narrative was arguably trig‐ tive rendering of the global village, digital communica‐ gered by the deployment of data‐driven micro‐targeting tion tools were used primarily to maintain relationships in political campaigning epitomized by the Cambridge with people in close physical and social proximity instead Analytica data scandal and the ensuing data lockdown of initiating relations with strangers. Friendster, a sem‐ enforced by social media platforms. Since then, digital inal social networking site predating Facebook, simply trace data has been increasingly linked to disinforma‐ provided a tool for scaling up social networks rooted in tion, misinformation, and influence operations across proximate social relations and representing this dynamic Western industrialized democracies and countries in the to the community. Global South, where state and non‐state actors seek to But the scaling of geographically‐situated social net‐ strategically diffuse content that heightens partisanship works to online platforms is not a perfect mirror, if it and erodes the general trust in democratic institutions is a mirror at all, of social relationships established in (Walker et al., 2019). one’s immediate surroundings. boyd (2008) noted that These metaphors refer to two milestones in how the social graph of Friendster users with numerous com‐ internet scholarship theorizes social media and net‐ mon ties offered a good indication of severed relation‐ working technology: first it was perceived and concep‐ ships. Whenever user A and user B shared many friends tualized as a force for integration, only to be subse‐ in common, but were not friends themselves, there was quently defined as force for polarization. In the following a good indication that this was due to a severed personal we unpack the theoretical tensions between spatially connection, not a social opportunity. This is in sharp inspired narratives that either foreground cooperation contrast with the dynamics of social relations observed or division against the backdrop of large‐scale influence offline, where exes cannot be simply deleted from one’s operations and a landscape of disinformation. We con‐ life while also maintaining the social network that sup‐ clude with an assessment that while networking technol‐ ported their previous relationship. In other words, the ogy may well produce a globally interconnected society, Friendster network was not merely mirroring offline it nevertheless continues to support intergroup bound‐ social networks, but creating a disparate version with par‐ aries and outgroup stereotyping typical of geographically allel albeit adjoining rules of engagement (boyd, 2008). situated communities (Hampton & Wellman, 2020). This persistent McLuhanian account of online social networks informed much of early internet research 2. From Global Village to Identity Tribes where social platforms were framed as a window to social contexts and local communities. It also provided 2.1. Global Village the theoretical framework to a large body of scholarship praising the democratization of public discourse brought The suggestion of a global village exudes the formulaic by open platforms and networked publics (Howard & optimism of the 1960s but managed to leave a last‐ Hussain, 2013). During this period, the open infrastruc‐ ing imprint on the discussion about the internet in the ture of networked publics was explored in scholarship 1990s. In the years leading up to the dotcom bubble, detailing how online social networks supported gate‐ digital communication was thought to bring the world watching (Bruns, 2005) and practices in citizen jour‐ together, both geographically and politically. During the nalism that

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us