Community, Cooperation, and Conflict in Wikipedia

Community, Cooperation, and Conflict in Wikipedia

Community, Cooperation, and Conflict in Wikipedia John Riedl GroupLens Research University of Minnesota UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Wikipedia & the “Editor Decline” Number of Active Editors UC Irvine 2012 2 Vision ! "Community Health ! "Humans + Computers ! "Synthetic vs. Analytic Research UC Irvine 2012 3 Readership vs. Creation Date UC Irvine 2012 4 Search Engine Test vs Creation Date UC Irvine 2012 5 UC Irvine 2012 6 Community Health We can tell when a community has failed. Our goal is to know before it fails, and to know what to do to prevent failure. UC Irvine 2012 7 UC Irvine 2012 8 ! "Reader ! "Contributor ! "Collaborator ! "Leader UC Irvine 2012 9 Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia (Group 2007) Reid Priedhorsky Jilin Chen Shyong (Tony) K. Lam Katherine Panciera Loren Terveen John Riedl UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Probability of View Damaged UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance WikiSym 2011 Shyong (Tony) K. Lam University of Minnesota Anuradha Uduwage University of Minnesota Zhenhua Dong Nankai University Shilad Sen Macalester College David R. Musicant Carleton College Loren Terveen University of Minnesota John Riedl University of Minnesota UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Gender Gap – Overall 2009 editor cohort – females are… 16% of known-gender editors [1 in 6] 9% of known-gender edits [1 in 11] UC Irvine 2012 13 H1a: Gap-Exists Gender Gap – Historical Is Wikipedia’s gender gap closing? Many tech gender gaps are narrowing… Internet, Smartphones, online games …and some have reversed… Blogging, Facebook, Twitter UC Irvine 2012 15 Gender Gap Over Time UC Irvine 2012 16 Movie Gender – Article Length Female-interest topics = Lower quality articles © 2001 Lionsgate © 1982 Orion Pictures © 1995 Warner Bros. Male Female Audience Audience Wikimedia Foundation – Vision “Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That’s our commitment.” UC Irvine 2012 18 Collier & Bear, CSCW 2012 ! " H1: Female editors don’t like conflict. SUPPORTED ! " H2: Female editors have lower confidence. SUPPORTED ! " H3: Female contributors prefer to share and collaborate. SUPPORTED ! " H4: Female contributors have less time? REVERSED UC Irvine 2012 19 ! "Reader ! "Contributor ! "Collaborator ! "Leader UC Irvine 2012 20 SuggestBot Cosley et al., IUI 2007 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA How do people find tasks? Randomly Chronologically Community needs Alphabetically UC Irvine 2012 22 UC Irvine 2012 23 SuggestBot Results ! " Intelligent recommendations 4x more likely to be acted on ! " Type of intelligence not as important ! " Live on Wikipedia; Join at: o" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SuggestBot ! " SuggestBot 2.0: Balance interest with value UC Irvine 2012 24 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ! " SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Traditional Readership Quality Both dimensions Combined UC Irvine 2012 25 Vision ! "Community Health ! "Humans + Computers ! "Synthetic vs. Analytic Research UC Irvine 2012 26 UC Irvine 2012 27 UC Irvine 2012 28 ! "Reader ! "Contributor ! "Collaborator ! "Leader UC Irvine 2012 29 He Says, She Says: Conflict and Coordination in Wikipedia Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan Pendleton, Ed Chi CHI 2008 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Types of work Article Talk, user, procedure Direct work Indirect work Immediately Coordination, conflict consumable Maintenance work Reverts, vandalism UC Irvine 2012 31 Machine Learning: Predicting Conflict UC Irvine 2012 32 The Effects of Diversity on Group Productivity and Member Withdrawal in Online Volunteer Groups Jilin Chen Yuqing Ren John Riedl CHI 2010 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA “A diverse collection of independently- deciding individuals is likely to make certain types of decisions and predictions better than individuals or even experts.” UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA However, difference in opinions and backgrounds can also cause conflicts, protests and wars sometimes … UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Newcomers vs. Old-timers “This user is sick of the bullshit on wikipedia. It is my belief that wikipedia … is increasingly becoming a place for a small group that is in power to force their views upon the world.” UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA What is Diversity? ! " Difference among individuals on: o"Demographic attributes: age, gender, race o"Informational attributes: tenure, education level, knowledge and interest areas o"Value attributes: personality, belief UC Irvine 2012 37 What is Diversity? ! " Difference among individuals on: o"Demographic attributes: age, gender, race o"Informational attributes: tenure, education level, knowledge and interest areas o"Value attributes: personality, belief UC Irvine 2012 38 UC Irvine 2012 39 UC Irvine 2012 40 Analysis Approach ! " Hierarchical Linear Model o"Project quarters within the same project are correlated ! " Incremental Approach o"Start with a null model, and increase its complexity incrementally o"Ensure that the predictors in the model are useful UC Irvine 2012 41 Tenure Diversity : Results UC Irvine 2012 42 Interest Diversity : Results UC Irvine 2012 43 Future Research ! " Direct Manipulation of Group Diversity o"Is it more beneficial to introduce a newcomer or an old-timer to a particular project? ! " Examination of Group Processes o"Do members yell at each other more often when the group is too diverse? UC Irvine 2012 44 Don't bite the newbies: How Reverts affect the Quantity and Quality of Wikipedia Work Aaron Halfaker, Niki Kittur and John Riedl WikiSym 2011 UC Irvine 2012 45 Wiki solution: The revert " The revert UC Irvine 2012 46 Research Question: ! " What effect do reverts have on editor activity? UC Irvine 2012 47 Measuring Changes: Activity Deltas UC Irvine 2012 48 Measuring Changes: Activity Deltas UC Irvine 2012 49 Measuring Changes: Activity Deltas UC Irvine 2012 50 Effect on Quality of work UC Irvine 2012 51 Summary " Being reverted predicts: " Decreases in quantity of work " Increase in quality of work " Overall increase in productivity! " Curmudgeons " Being reverted by an old-timer intensifies the decrease in quantity, no change to quality " Highly experienced editors should be kept away from newbies. UC Irvine 2012 52 Revert percent over time, by PARCeditor Social Cognition class Blog, 2009 Percentedits reverted Edits per month UC Irvine 2012 53 Revert Rate vs. Tenure 9% FemaleRevert newcomers get Chart reverted 8% more often than male newcomers Female 7% Male 6% Lam et al. WikiSym 2011: WP:Clubhouse 5% 4% 3% 2% Reverted Edit Percentage 1% 0% 1 2-3 4-7 8-15 16-31 32-63 64-127 128-255 Stage of Editor Tenure (Edit #) UC Irvine 2012 54 NICE: Social Translucence through UI Intervention Aaron Halfaker, Bryan Song, D. Alex Stuart, Niki Kittur, John Riedl WikiSym 2011 UC Irvine 2012 55 NICE " User Interface mod for English Wikipedia " Installed by the editor performing the revert " Helps an editor revert gently " Live and available in English Wikipedia " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EpochFail/NICE UC Irvine 2012 56 Reverting Normally UC Irvine 2012 57 Reverting NICE-ly UC Irvine 2012 58 Field Experiment " Broadcast to forums & mailing lists used by Wikipedians " 49 reverting editors -" Message Box -" Newbie Warning -" Message Box + Newbie Warning -" Control " 487 reverted editors UC Irvine 2012 59 Results " Message Box (easy communication) " Newbies: (-) Quality (Sigh!) " Non-newbies: " (+) Project pages, (+) Communication (+) Quality " Newbie Warning (social awareness) " Newbies: (+) Article work " Non-newbies: (+) Quality UC Irvine 2012 60 Vision ! "Community Health ! "Humans + Computers ! "Synthetic vs. Analytic Research UC Irvine 2012 61 ! "Reader ! "Contributor ! "Collaborator ! "Leader UC Irvine 2012 62 Mortality Rate Article creation restricted to registered users Jimmy Wales’ Wikimania plenary: focus on quality instead of quantity UC Irvine 2012 63 Female Leaders ! " Females who become Wikipedian are much more likely to become admins UC Irvine 2012 64 Reporters in Captivity “A journalist is someone who is on no side and a friend of everybody.” ! " Rohde captured by Taliban, Nov 2008 ! " Times gets 7 months news embargo ! " Wales says “mainstream media did not report”, so Wikipedia could embargo ! " Christian Science Monitor not mentioned – though Rohde won Pulitzer there ! " Rohde escapes, June 2009 UC Irvine 2012 65 The Effects of Group Composition on Decision Quality in a Social Production Community Shyong (Tony) K. Lam Jawed Karim John Riedl University of Minnesota Stanford University GROUP 2010 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Wikipedia Article Deletions ! " About 30% of created articles are deleted ! " Most deletions are uncontroversial ! " Disagreements resolved via decision process Articles for Deletion (AfD) UC Irvine 2012 67 Sample AfD AfD Result (Keep or Delete) AfD NominationLooks like a vote, but it isn’t one Wikipedians call these “!votes” Discussion and debate UC Irvine 2012 68 Measuring Decision Quality Computing a believable quality metric is hard Lots of Wikipedia policies Who are we to judge? Use implicit community feedback Persistent decision = Good Reversed decision = Bad About 4% of decisions are reversed in 1 year UC Irvine 2012 69 Consensus Call Profiles Consensus100 Call Profiles - WPWide 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 % AfDs Closed as Delete 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Delete !Vote % UC Irvine 2012 70 Consensus Call Profiles 100 Consensus Call Profiles - Keep 90 Wikipedia-Wide 80 70 Keep-Biased Admin 60 50 40 30 20 % AfDs Closed as Delete 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    78 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us