Mpharm Accreditation Report

Mpharm Accreditation Report

Master of Pharmacy degree (MPharm) Durham University Report of a step 7 part 1 accreditation event January 2017 General Pharmaceutical Council, MPharm step 7 part 1 accreditation report Page 1 of 19 Durham University, 18-19 January 2017 Event summary and conclusions Provider Durham University Course Masters of Pharmacy degree (MPharm) Event type Accreditation Step Step 7 Part 1 Event date 18-19 January 2017 Accreditation period Full period of accreditation until the Durham University MPharm degree is taught out at Newcastle University NB. Accreditation is confirmed after a satisfactory Step 7 Part 2 event has taken place in June 2017 Outcome Approval The accreditation team agreed to recommend to the Registrar of the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) that Durham University be fully accredited as a provider of an MPharm degree, subject to a Step 7 Part 2 visit in June 2017. Following a satisfactory outcome of this visit Durham University MPharm graduates will be permitted to apply to enter pharmacist pre-registration training in Great Britain. NB. The delivery of the accredited Durham University MPharm degree from 2017-18 until all registered students have graduated, or have ceased to be eligible to graduate, will be by arrangement with Newcastle University in a manner to be determined by the two institutions. This is subject to the availability of resources to deliver the curriculum in the manner described to the team. The GPhC will develop a future visit schedule as part of the engagement process with the University during this period of transfer. Conditions There were no conditions Standing conditions Please refer to Appendix 1 Recommendations No recommendations were made Registrar decision Following the event, the Registrar of the GPhC accepted the accreditation team’s recommendation and approved full accreditation as a provider of an MPharm degree, subject to a satisfactory Step 7 Part 2 visit in June 2017 Key contact (provider) Professor Andrew Husband Accreditation team Professor Stephen Denyer, (Team leader) Pro Vice-Chancellor (Education and Student Experience), University of Brighton Professor Brenda Costall, (Academic) Professor of Neuropharmacology, Former Pro-Vice-Chancellor Planning, Research and Resources, Deputy Vice- Chancellor and Head of Pharmacy, University of Bradford Dr Ruth Edwards, (Academic), Senior Lecturer and MPharm Course Leader, General Pharmaceutical Council, MPharm step 7 part 1 accreditation report Page 2 of 19 Durham University, 18-19 January 2017 Robert Gordon University Mrs Gail Fleming, (Pharmacist), Head of Pharmacy, Health Education England (London and South East) Mr Owen Wood, (Pharmacist - recently registered), Humanitarian Pharmacy Adviser, Save the Children UK Ms Leonie Milliner, (Lay member) Chief Executive, Association for Nutrition GPhC representative Ms Joanne Martin, Quality Assurance Manager, GPhC Rapporteur Professor Brian Furman, Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology, University of Strathclyde Introduction Role of the GPhC The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) is the statutory regulator for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians and is the accrediting body for pharmacy education in Great Britain. The GPhC is responsible for setting standards and approving education and training courses which form part of the pathway towards registration for pharmacists. The UK qualification required as part of the pathway to registration as a pharmacist is a GPhC-accredited Master of Pharmacy degree course (MPharm). This accreditation event was carried out in accordance with the GPhC’s 2011 MPharm Accreditation Methodology and the course was reviewed against the GPhC’s 2011 education standards ‘Future Pharmacists: Standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists’. The GPhC’s right to check the standards of pharmacy qualifications leading to annotation and registration as a pharmacist is the Pharmacy Order 2010. It requires the GPhC to ‘approve’ courses by appointing ‘visitors’ (accreditors) to report to the GPhC’s Council on the ‘nature, content and quality’ of education as well as ‘any other matters’ the Council may require. The powers and obligations of the GPhC in relation to the accreditation of pharmacy education are legislated in the Pharmacy Order 2010. For more information, visit: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/231/contents/made Step 7 accreditation event The MPharm degree accreditation process involves seven steps before full accreditation is granted. The final step (Step 7) is made up of two parts. The first part of the two-part Step 7 accreditation event involves a visit to the University by the accreditation team to review the suitability of the programme for full accreditation. In reaching its conclusion, the accreditation team must make two separate judgements: First, whether or not the University meets the criteria for a new provider delivering a new MPharm degree; and, second, whether or not the University meets the criteria for an established provider delivering an existing MPharm degree. The second part of the Step 7 accreditation event involves a return visit to the University by the team leader and the GPhC’s Quality Assurance Manager to confirm the appropriate conduct of the assessment process for the current academic year. At that meeting, the views of external examiners will be sought. Background Durham University had approached the GPhC in April 2010 with a view to entering the process for General Pharmaceutical Council, MPharm step 7 part 1 accreditation report Page 3 of 19 Durham University, 18-19 January 2017 accrediting a new MPharm degree to be delivered by the School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health (formerly the School of Medicine and Health), which comprises the Division of Pharmacy and the Division of Medicine. Following a successful step 1 event in September 2011, the University appointed a Director of Education to develop the programme with a plan to admit the first cohort of students in 2013. The University progressed successfully through step 2 (June 2012) and step 3 (February 2013) events, without any conditions or recommendations, subsequently admitting its first students in October 2013. Successful step 4, step 5 and step 6 events took place in June 2014, January 2015 and December 2015 respectively, again without any conditions or recommendations, thus allowing progression to step 7 of the accreditation process. Step 7 comprises two parts during the first part of which the team must make two separate judgements. These are first, whether or not the University meets the criteria for a new provider delivering a new MPharm degree, and second, whether or not the University meets the criteria for an established provider delivering an existing MPharm degree. However, judgement on the latter was complicated by the decision made jointly by Durham and Newcastle universities in July 2016 that Durham’s School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, including the Division of Pharmacy and its provisionally accredited MPharm degree, will be transferred to Newcastle with effect from the 2017/18 academic session. As a result of this, the GPhC developed a modified and legally valid accreditation methodology, agreed by both institutions, to accommodate the transfer of an existing, provisionally-accredited MPharm degree to a new provider. This had allowed steps 1-3 of the accreditation process to be held as a single event at Newcastle University in October 2016; steps 1-3 cover all standards to ensure the preparedness of the institution for admission of students to an MPharm programme. At that event, the accreditation team had agreed to recommend to the Registrar that Newcastle University should be permitted to progress from step 3 to step 4 of the modified MPharm accreditation process; this had been subject to two conditions relating to making a decision on the School leadership, developing a complete risk analysis and contingency plan, and establishing an approved and collaborative contractual agreement with Durham University. The modified methodology permitted the team now to make determinations on how Durham University meets the criteria for an established provider delivering an existing MPharm degree, for example, by recommending monitoring the Durham MPharm degree being delivered at Newcastle for as long as the team considers appropriate. Accordingly, a step 7 event was scheduled for 2017 and the following constitutes a record of the first part of this event held in January. Documentation Prior to the event, the provider submitted documentation to the GPhC in line with the agreed timescales. The documentation was reviewed by the accreditation team and it was deemed to be satisfactory to provide a basis for discussion. Pre-visit In advance of the main visit, a pre-visit meeting was held by teleconference on 22 December 2016. The purpose of the pre-visit meeting was to prepare for the event, allow the GPhC and the university to ask any questions or seek clarification, and to finalise arrangements for the visit. The event The event began with a private meeting of the accreditation team and GPhC representatives on 18 January 2017. The remainder of the event took place onsite at Durham University, Queen’s Campus, on 18--19 January 2017, and comprised a series of meetings with staff and students of the University. Declarations of interest General Pharmaceutical Council, MPharm step 7 part 1 accreditation report Page 4 of 19 Durham University, 18-19 January 2017 There were no declarations of interest. Key findings Standard 1: Patient and public safety

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us