CHAPTER XVII BIBLIOGRAPHY ( 567 - 587 ) originals not seen [ 567 ] *Abedin, S. Abutilon muticum and A. pannosum complex. Pakistan 3. Bot. 12: 1^3 - 1^2,. 1980. Ahuja, K.K. & P.J.Cherian. Canscora concanensis C.B.Cl. in Maharashtra. 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 66; 655 - 657 (1969) 1970. Airy Shaw, H.K. Note on the taxonomic position of Nyctanthes L. and Dimetra Kerr. Kew Bull. 1952; 271 - 272. 1952. The genus Dysophylla Blume. A nomenclatural note. Taxon 16; 189 - 190. 1967. &; L.L. Forman. The genus Spondias L. (Anacardiaceae) in tropical Asia. Kew Bull. 21; 1 - 19, f. 3, pi. 2. 1967. Ali, S.I. The genus Goniogyna DC. Taxon 16; ^^63 - ^^6^. 1967. Bot. 3&. LinnM. .Qasir Soc.. 80;Hybridisatio 69 - 77, f.n 1.o f1980 Acaci. a nilotica (Mimosoideae) complex. Almeida, M.R. Notes on Boerhavia. 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 65; 266 - 268. 1968, Almeida, S.M. A note on Heracleum from Maharashtra - a new species and a new combination. Indian Forester 111: 15S - 160. 19S5. Anand Kumar. Begonia picta Smith (Begoniaceae) - a new record for the presidency of Bombay. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 20: 185 - 186 (1978) 1979. Anonymous. Socio-Economic Review &: District Statistical Abstract of Nasik Dt. Directorate of Economic & Statistics, Govt, of Maharashtra, Bombay. 1973 - 7^*. Gazetteer of India. Maharashtra State. Nasik district (Revised Edition) Bombay Gazetteers Department, Govt, of Maharashtra. 1975. Geology of the Nasik district, Maharashtra. Geological Survey of India. 1976. Ansari, M.Y. Asclepiadaceae ; Genus Ceropegia. Fasc. Fl. India 16; 1 - 3^, pi. ^, f. 18. 198^. & B.G.Kulkarni. Ceropegia sahyadrica Ansari & Kulkarni - a new species of Asclepiadaceae from Sahyadri ranges in Maharashtra State. Indian Forester 97: 688 - 690, pj. 2. 1971. &: Rolla Rao. Two new species of the genus Iphigenia Kunth (Liliaceae) from Western Ghats (India). Bull. Bot. Surv. India 20: 162 - 164, pi. 2, t. 1 (1978) 1979. &: R.Sundara Raghavan. Nomenclature of some bulbous Liliaceae of India. 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 77: 172 - 17^^. 1980. Babu, C.R. A new name in Campanula Linn. (Campanulaceae). Ibid. 65: 808- 809 (1968) 1969. [ 568 ] Bakuizen van Den Brink, R.C. & Steenis C.G.GJ.van. A note on Pogostemon Desf. & Dysophylla Bl. Taxon 17: 235 - 236. 1968. Balakrishnan, N.P. Studies in Indian Euphorbiaceae 5: The genus Chrozophora Neck. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 15: 1 - 7 (1973) 1976. Bancrjcc, 5.P. Identity of Trichodcsma ainplcxicaulc DC. ( non Roth ). Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal 16: 9 - 11 (1962) 1963. & P.K.Mukherjee. Studies in the Rhamnaceae - 3. A taxonomic revision of Indian Ventilagineae. Indian Forester 96: 203 - 217, f. 1. 1970. , & B.B.Pramanik. A taxonomic revision of Indo - Burmese Trichodesma R.Br. (Boraginaceae). Bull. Bot. Surv. India 17: 108 - 123, f. 2 (1975) 1978. Bates, David, M. Typification of Malvastrum A.Gray, one last time? Taxon 27: ^95. 1978. Bennet, S.S.R. The taxonomic status of the genus Pongamia Vent. 3. Bombay nat Hist. Soc. 68; 302 - 30f. 1971. Bhadbhade, M.A. Working plan for the Peint & adjoining forests of West Nashik division - Nashik Circle, Maharashtra State for the years 1969-70 to 1988- 89. Billore, K.V. Euphorbia erythroclada Boiss. - a little known species from Maha­ rashtra. Indian Forester 95: 576 - 78, f. 5. 1969. & K.Hemadri. Leucas deodika-'i Billore et Hemadri - a new species of Lamiaceae from the Sahyadri range, Maharashtra State. Ibid. 96: 858 - 60, f. 3. 1970. Blatter, E. Revision of the Flora of the Bombay Presidency. 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 31; 5i^7 - 57, 897 - 917; 32: {k - 33*, 281 - 98*, ^^08 - 35*, 622 - 49*; 33: 7 - 25*, 229 - k?>*, i^ZQ - 96*, 753 - 75*', 3'f: 12- 26*, 291 - 306, 623 - 37, 877 - 900; 35: 13 - 31*, 25f - 75*, i^U - 95*, 722 - 36*; 36: 13 - 28*, 307 - 20, 524 - 37*, 7?>l - 95*; 37: 15 - 35*, 255 - 77*, 532 - 48*, 76t^ - 79*; 38: 6 - 18*. 1926 - 35 ( * Asterisk marked jointly with C. McCann ). ._ " Chlorophytum glaucoides Blatt. sp. nov." 3. As. Soc. Beng. (n.s.) 26: 361 - 62. 1930. _^ & D'Almeida, 3.F. The Ferns of Bombay. 227 pp. (C.D.B.Taraporewale Sons & Co.; Bombay) 1922. ._ & F.Hallberg. A revision of the Indian species of Rotala & Ammannia 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 25: 701 - 22; 26: 210 - 17. 1918. _. &: C.McCann. The Bombay Grasses Sci. Monogr. N.5. Imp. Counc. Agric. f^^^* India pp. xxi + 324, f. 189. 1935. Bole, P.V. & H. Santapau. A note on Neuracanthus sphaerostachys Dalz. 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 50: 428 - 30, pi. 2. 1951. [ 569 ] Bor, N.L. The Grassses of Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistan. Pergamon Press, London, pp. xvii + 767, f. 80, pi. 1," t. 1. 1960 ( Repr. by Otto Koeltz Antiquariat, Federal Republic of Germany, 1973 ). Ischaemum raizadae or I. borii. Indian Forester 97: 73. 1971. Borssum Waalkes, 3. van. Maiesian Malvaceae revised. Blumea Ik: 1 - 213, f. 21. 1966. Bosman, M.T.M. & A.3.P.Dee Haas. A revision of the genus Tephrosia (Leguminosae - Papilionoideae) in Malesia. Ibid. 28: ^^21 - 'f87, f. 6, map 6. 1983. Bremekamp, C.E.B. Materials for a monograph of the Strobilanthinae (Acanthaceae). Nederl. Akad. Wet. Verh. ( Sect. 2 ) 'fl: 1 - 306. 19^^^^. Bullock, A.A. On the correct name for the Indian Coral tree. Kew Bull. 20: 29^+. 1966. Burkart, A. A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae, sub-fam. Mimosoi- deae). 3. Arnold Arbor. 57: 219 - ^^9. 1976. Burtt, B.L. Polygala arvensis, chinensis & glomerata. Notes R.B.G. Edinb. 32: 'f03 - 40^+. 1973. Chakravarty, H.L. Monograph on Indian Cucurbitaceae (Taxonomy & distribution). Rec. Bot. Surv. India 17: iii + 23if, f. 96. 1959. Cucurbitaceae. Fasc. Fl. India 11; 1 - 136, f. 11, pi. 2. 1982. Champion, H.G. & S.K.Seth. A revised Survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Delhi 6, pp. xxv + liOk, pi. 103, map 7. 1968. Chatterjee, D. Acacia chundra or Acacia sundra ?. Sci. 6c Cult. 1^: 290 - 291. 19^19. Chaudhari, A.B. Studies on the Meliaceae of India and neighbouring countries. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal 21: 1 - Ik. 1967. Chavan, A.R. & G.M.Oza. Cucumis setosus Cogn. - A new record for Bombay. 3. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 57: 699, pi. 1. 1960. Cherian, P.3. & R.D.Pataskar. Contribution to the Flora of Saptashringi and adjoining hills, Maharashtra. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 11: 23 - 3^^, map 1, t. 1 (1969) 1971. &: . Studies on the vegetation of Surgana - Harsul ranges of the Sahyadris, Nasik District, Maharashtra. M±. 11: 381 - 397, map 1 (1969) 1972. Chew, W.L. A monograph of Laportea (Urticeae). Gdn's. Bull. Singapore 25: 111 - 78, f. 22. 1969. Clayton, W.D. Studies in the Gramineae : 6. Sporoboleae. The Sporobolus indicus complex. Kew Bull. 19: 287 - 96, f. 2. 1965. Notes on the tribe Andropogoneae (Gramineae). Ibid. 35: 813 - 18. 1981. [ 570 J Cook, C.D.K. A revision of the genus Rotala (Lythraceae). Boissiera 29: 1 - 156, f. 28, t. 1, nnaps 16. 1979. Cooke, T. The Flora of the Presidency of Bombay 2 Vols. London. 1901 - 1908. ( Repr. ed. 1958, 3 Vols.). Cope, T.A. New combinations in Asiatic Grasses. Kew Bull. 35: 701 - 70^1, map 1. 1980. Corner, E.J.H. Taxonomic notes on Ficus Linn., in Asia and Australia. 1. subgen. Urostigma (Gasp.) Miq. Gdn's Bull. Singapore 17: 308 - ^^85. 1960. The classification of Moraceae. Ibid. 19: 187 - 252, f. 12, t. 2. 1962. Cowan, 3.M. The genus Wendlandia. Notes R.B.G. Edinb. 16: 233 - 316, f. ^. J932. Cramer, L.H. A revision of Coleus L. (Labiatae) in Sri Lanka (Ceylon). Kew Bull. 32: 551 - 61. Dalzell, N.A. & A.Gibson. The Bombay Flora or short descriptions of all the indigenous plants hitherto discovered in or near the Bombay Presidency together with a supplement of introduced and naturalized species. Bombay. 1861. Dandy, 3.E. 6c A.W.Exell. Nomenclature of three species of Caesalpinia, C. bonducella, C. crista and C. bonduc (L.) Roxb. 3. Bot. London 76: 178 - 80. 1938. Daniel, P. & E. Vajravelu. Name changes in some south Indian flowering plants. 3. Econ. Tax. Bot. 3; 675 - 76. 1982. Danser, B.H. The British - Indian species of Viscum revised and compared with those of south eastern Asia, Malaysia and Australia. Blumea ^: 261 - 319, pi. 3. 19'^1. Davies, F.G. The genus Gynura (Compositae) in India, Sri Lanka and the Seychelles. Kew Bull. 35; 363 - 67. 1980. Deb, D.B. Enumeration, synonymy and distribution of Solanaceae in India. 3. Econ. Tax. Bot. 1; 33 - 5'f, t, 1. 1980. <5c S. Dasgupta. Revision of the genus Urginea Steinhill (Liliaceae) in India. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 16: 116 - 2^, f. f (197'f) 1977. & . Revision of the genus Scilla L. in India (Liliaceae). Ibid. 17: ^1 - 50, f. 3 (1975) 1978. _• &: . Liliaceae : Tribe - Scilleae. Fasc. Fl. India 7: 1 - 23, f. 51. 1981. & • Generic status of Urginea Steinhill (Liliaceae). 3. Econ. Tax. Bot. 3: 819 - 25. 1982. [ 571 1 . & K.C.Malick. Revision of tine genus Rubia L. in India and adjoining regions. "Bull. Bot. Surv. India 10: 1 - 16, f. 9. 1968. 6c Ratna Dutta. Revision of the genus Spermacoce (Rubiaceae) in India and adjoining regions. J. Econ. Tax. Dot. 5: 1037 - 63, f. 9. 198^^. )eshpande, U.R. Poaceae : Tribe - Andropogoneae. Fasc. Fl. India 15: 1 - 30. 1983. ;)ewit, H.C.D. A. revision of ^Aalaysian Bauhineae. Reinwardtia 3: 3Sl - 539, f. 30. 1956. 3ing Hou. A revision of the genus Ceiastrus. Ann. Missouri Bot. Card. ^2: 215 - 302. 1955. ^renth, E. A revision of the family Taccaceae. BJumea 20: 367 - ^^06, f.