The Study of the Anomalous Acceleration of the Pioneer 10 and 11 SlavaSlava G.G. Turyshev,Turyshev, JohnJohn D.D. AndersonAnderson ((JetJet PropulsionPropulsion Laboratory,Laboratory, CaltechCaltech)) MichaelMichael MartinMartin NietoNieto ((LosLos AlamosAlamos NationalNational Laboratory,Laboratory, UU ofof CaliforniaCalifornia)) The XXII Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics Stanford University, December 13-17, 2004 THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Conclusions and Outline: The Pioneer 10 and 11 anomalous acceleration: −82 aP =±×(8.74 1.33) 10 cm/s A line-of-sight constant acceleration towards the Sun: –We find no mechanism or theory that explains the anomaly – Most plausible cause is systematics, yet to be demonstrated Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 082004, gr-qc/0104064 Possible Origin? Conventional Physics [not yet understood]: – Gas leaks, heat reflection, drag force, etc… New Physics [many proposals exist, some interesting] A “win-win” situation, as both are important: – CONVENTIONAL explanation: improvement of spacecraft engineering for precise navigation & attitude control – NEW physics: would be truly remarkable… THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Pioneer 10/11 Mission – Built: TRW (Northrop-Grumman Space Technology) – Navigation: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech – Project management: NASA Ames Research Center Position of Pioneer 10 on 15 December 2004: Last successful precession maneuver to point the spacecraft to Earth was accomplished on 11 Feb 2000 (distance from the Sun of 75 AU) THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Pioneer F during checkout tests The Pioneer F spacecraft during a checkout with the launch vehicle third stage at Cape Kennedy. Pioneer F became Pioneer 10. THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Pioneer 10 Launch: 2 March 1972 THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Pioneer 10/11: Main Missions Trajectories for Pioneer 10 and 11 during the main mission phase THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Trajectories of Pioneers and Voyagers Ecliptic pole view of Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, and Voyager trajectories. Digital artwork by T. Esposito. NASA ARC Image # AC97-0036-3. THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Detection of the Anomaly Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 082004, gr-qc/0104064 Mid 1979 (search for Planet X with Pioneer 10): – Solar-radiation pressure away from the Sun became < 5 × 10−8 cm/s2 – Search for unmodeled accelerations started (~ 20AU) Early 1980 (Orbit Determination Analysis – ODP): – JPL analysis found the biggest systematic error in the accel residuals −8 2 is a constant bias aP ~ (8 ± 3) × 10 cm/s directed towards the Sun THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY The Pioneer Anomaly PRL 81(1998) 2858-2861, gr-qc/9808081 The two-way anomaly to first order in (v/c) simply is: 1987 1998.8 CHASMP two-way Doppler residuals (observed Doppler velocity minus model Doppler velocity) for Pioneer 10 vs time. [1 Hz is equal to 65 mm/s range change per second] THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY The Pioneer Anomaly Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 082004, gr-qc/0104064 1987 1998.8 Adding one more parameter to the model – a constant radial acceleration – led to residuals distribution ~ zero Doppler velocity with a systematic variation ~3.0 mm/s. The quality of the fit may be determined by the ratio of residuals to the downlink carrier frequency, ν0≈ 2.29 GHz. THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Modeling the Motion of Pioneer 10/11 Relativistic eq.m. for celestial bodies are correct to (v/c)4: – Relativistic grav. accelerations (EIH) include: Sun, Moon, 9 planets are point masses in isotropic, PPN, N-body metric; – Newtonian gravity from large asteroids; terrestrial, lunar figure effects; Earth’s tides; lunar physical librations Models for light propagation are to (v/c)2: THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Standard Models of Non-Gravitational Forces Model accounts for many sources of non-grav. forces, including: – Solar radiation and wind pressure; the interplanetary media – Attitude-control propulsive maneuvers; gas leakage from the propulsion system – DSN antennae contributions to the spacecraft radio tracking data – Torques produced by above mentioned forces Orbit determination procedure, includes: – Models of precession, nutation, sidereal rotation, polar motion, tidal effects, and tectonic plates drift; – Model values of the tidal deceleration, non-uniformity of rotation, polar motion, Love numbers, and Chandler wobble are obtained observationally via LLR, SLR and VLBI (from ICRF): Now [after Pioneer] model can be adjusted to include: – Effects of the recoil force due to emitted radio power – Anisotropic thermal radiation of spacecraft Unknown forces are routinely modeled as stochastic accels: – Exponentially correlated in time, with a variable time constant – Stochastic variable was sampled in 0-, 5-,10-day batches THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Sources of External Systematic Error [PRD, 2002] Interesting, but not a major source of concern! THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Sources of On-board Systematic Error [PRD, 2002] Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 082004, gr-qc/0104064 Pioneer DSN antenna at Goldstone THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Pioneer 10/11 spacecraft A drawing of the Pioneer spacecraft THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY On-board Power and Heat Thermal system and on-board power: Design based on well understood process of on-board nuclear-to- electric energy conversion and heat dissipation within the craft THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY On-board Power and Heat 1987 [97 W] ~32.8% reduction 1998.8 [65 W] 2001 Heat is clearly important source, but: – NOT strong enough to explain the anomaly – Exponential decay (or linear decrease) is NOT seen in the anomaly aP IJMP A 17 (2002) 875-885, gr-qc/0107022 THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Models Used to Explain the Anomaly Models and suggestions that failed to explain the anomaly: – Non-gravitational effects: ● Solar pressure, solar wind, interplanetary medium ● Precessional attitude control maneuvers and “gas leaks” ● Nominal thermal radiation, plutonium half life – Some viscous drag force (ULY: solar radiation, maneuvers) – Gravity from the Kuiper belt; gravity from the Galaxy – Dark Matter distributed in a halo around the solar system – Drifting clocks, general relativity, the “speed of gravity” – Hardware problems at the DSN tracking stations – Errors in the planetary ephemerides – Errors in the values of the EOP, precession, and nutation; – Identical design of Pioneer 10/11 spacecraft (GLL, ULY: solar radiation, maneuvers) – Dust in the outer solar system Many more models had been proposed and investigated THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY The Pioneer Anomaly: Summary Our latest result for the Pioneer 10/11 anomalous acceleration: A line of sight constant acceleration of the s/c toward the Sun: –We find no mechanism or theory that explains the anomaly; – The most plausible cause is a systematic, yet to be demonstrated. Behavior of the Anomaly: – We have no real idea how far out the anomaly goes; – aP continues out roughly as a constant from ~10 AU; – Constancy: temporal and spatial variations less then 3.4%; – Amplified (or turned on) for hyperbolic, escape trajectories (?) Three Different Codes Used: – JPL Orbit Determination Program [DPODP various generations]; – Aerospace Corp [CHASPM/POEAS]; – GSFC [by Craig Markward in 2003, data from NSSDC]. Next Steps: – Early data processing [work initiated at JPL: fly-byes, entire data set] – Focus on different segments: close-in (direction of the anomaly), planetary flyby (amplification during flyby), long duration (constancy) – A European study of the PA recently initiated (ZARM, Bremen) THETHE STUDYSTUDY OFOF THETHE PIONEERPIONEER ANOMALYANOMALY Meanwhile… Pioneer 10 @ Arecibo Pioneer 10, as seen by 305 m antenna at Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico One “data point”… we need more!.