FEBRUARY 2019 The Internal Brakes on Violent Escalation The British extreme right in the 1990s ANNEX B Joel Busher, Coventry University Donald Holbrook, University College London Graham Macklin, Oslo University This report is the second empirical case study, produced out of The Internal Brakes on Violent Escalation: A Descriptive Typology programme, funded by CREST. You can read the other two case studies; The Trans-national and British Islamist Extremist Groups and The Animal Liberation Movement, plus the full report at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/news/internal- brakes-violent-escalation-a-descriptive-typology/ To find out more information about this programme, and to see other outputs from the team, visit the CREST website at: www.crestresearch.ac.uk/projects/internal-brakes-violent-escalation/ About CREST The Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST) is a national hub for understanding, countering and mitigating security threats. It is an independent centre, commissioned by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and funded in part by the UK security and intelligence agencies (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1). www.crestresearch.ac.uk ©2019 CREST Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence. www.crestresearch.ac.uk/copyright TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................5 2. INTERNAL BRAKES ON VIOLENCE WITHIN THE BRITISH EXTREME RIGHT .................10 2.1 BRAKE 1: STRATEGIC LOGIC .......................................................................................................................................10 2.2 BRAKE 2: MORAL LOGIC ............................................................................................................................................13 2.3 BRAKE 3: EGO MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................................................16 2.4 BRAKE 4: OUT-GROUP DEFINITION..........................................................................................................................20 2.5 BRAKE 5: ORGANISATIONAL LOGIC .......................................................................................................................22 3. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................25 INTRODUCTION BUSHER , HOLBROOK & MACKLIN who therefore advocated a more proactive response to fascists, most of whom were intent on returning to a 1. INTRODUCTION strategy of street level rebellion’ (Hayes, 2014, p. 230). Initially RA had been content to confront extreme right activists on a ‘pragmatic basis’. This changed in June Following its disastrous showing in the 1979 general 1984, however, after a contingent of skinheads attacked election, the National Front (NF), the principal engine an open-air concert in Jubilee Gardens organized by the of anti-immigration agitation during the 1970s, Labour-controlled Greater London Council to protest collapsed, imploding amidst personal recrimination Conservative cuts and unemployment. Thereafter, RA and factional struggle. NF chairman, John Tyndall, began developing its own ‘mobile combat unit’ that a hard line national socialist activist demanded moved beyond defending left-wing events and meetings autocratic control from the party’s National Directorate to undertake offensive violence against the extreme as the only means of arresting the party’s ongoing right (Hayes, 2014, p. 231). disintegration. When the National Directorate refused, Tyndall resigned in high dudgeon and in April 1982 The following year, on 28 July 1985, RA became one founded the British National Party (BNP), a small of the core components of Anti-Fascist Action (AFA), national socialist organization that styled itself as a broader alliance of militant and moderate left-wing the last bastion of racial rectitude in a profane and groups who coalesced around the principal of opposing culturally decadent world. Tyndall ruled the BNP as a resurgent extreme right-wing street movement. his personal fiefdom in accordance with the strictures Tensions between the “liberal” and “militant” wings of of the führerprinzip. Following the NF’s strategy, the the organization led to the group splitting in 1989. It was BNP staged numerous provocative marches designed relaunched shortly thereafter by several ideologically to win both publicity, recruits, and ultimately power, disparate left-wing and anarchist groups, all unified with the aim of replacing democratic government with by a single objective: militant physical and ideological authoritarian dictatorship. In reality, however, for the opposition to the extreme right (Hayes, 2014, pp. 237- majority of the 1980s the BNP was a marginal group, 38). operating more as a ‘street gang’ than a fully-fledged political party. Tyndall’s authority as leader rested, From 1985 onwards, AFA and the extreme right activists in part at least, upon his political past as a racial were embroiled in numerous violent encounters at a revolutionary, his activities during the 1960s earning variety of venues up and down the country for over a him convictions for paramilitary activity and firearms decade. Initially, AFA had attacked skinheads associated offences as well as assaulting a police officer, the latter with the remnants of the NF before moving to target the particularly jarring for him given his subsequent efforts Blood & Honour nazi music network through a series to cultivate a more orthodox ‘patriotic’ demeanour. of violent confrontations at the rendezvous points for its gigs in Hyde Park (May 1989) and at Waterloo Station The extreme right was not the only ideological (September 1992). AFA activists also targeted shops tendency to undergo a political transformation after in central London that served as outlets for extreme 1979. Following the collapse of the NF, the Trotskyist right-wing merchandise, which further undermined the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) took the decision network’s capacity to function. to wind-down the Anti-Nazi League (ANL). It also undertook to decommission the ‘squads’ – cadres of Despite a repertoire of violence that could include the activists whom it had utilized to defend ANL activities use of bottles, bats, iron bars, chains, and CS gas, against from attack. Superfluous to its newly emergent political their opponents, anti-fascist activists and extreme right priorities, the SWP expelled numerous ‘squadists’ activists generally demurred from upgrading to guns, from the party altogether (Renton, 2006, pp. 169-173). though C18 reportedly used firearms to threaten and Without a political home, many of these, predominantly intimidate internal rivals. Use of knives was a more working class, activists bandied together to found a new notable feature of extreme right violence, anti-fascist group in late 1981, Red Action (RA). These activists activists highlighted. The choice of weapons, which represented a section of the SWP ‘who refused to helped enshrine the ‘normal’ and indeed expected accept that electoral performance was the only indices parameters of violence, was underpinned both by by which to measure fascist activity or success, and 5 INTRODUCTION ANNEX B. The British extreme right in the 1990s. moral objections to killing and political calculations issued a memorandum to party organisers stressing as to the level of violence required to close down an the need for a new (community-orientated) approach extreme right meeting or march, which stopped short that would enable the BNP to distance itself from of lethality. ‘street-gang politics’ and ‘stake its claim in the serious political arena’. AFA responded to this by focusing These concerns, combined with conceptions of increasingly upon countering BNP activities leading activist risk (i.e., arrest and imprisonment), and the to an intensification of violent street conflict. The internalization of developments in the legislative and political progress of the BNP in London’s east End policing environment which severely limited ‘casual’ also led the SWP to relaunch the ANL whilst another opportunities to engage in lethal violence, served to group, the Anti-Racist Alliance, also emerged during inhibit lethality. this period. AFA perceived that these groups aimed simply to ‘protest’ rather than ‘stop’ the extreme right. There were outliers where actions exceeded these Its response, argues Copsey, ‘was to differentiate itself norms. Persons unknown firebombed the home of from this competition by further emphasizing its Leicestershire BNP organizer John Peacock in 1989.1 physical mettle’ (Copsey, 2011, p. 128). In November 1990, a crude explosive device was sent to an AFA meeting in Whitechapel (Birchall, 2010, p. AFA’s ongoing campaign led the BNP to upgrade its 209). During 1992 unknown perpetrators committed own tactical response to AFA’s assault upon the group. arson attacks against several left-wing premises in In late 1992 the BNP formed its own ‘Steward’s Group’ London (i.e., the Morning Star offices in April and to protect its meetings and leadership as well as to meet May) and the West Midlands (i.e., the Democratic the anti-fascist challenge offensively too. Those who Left in August and the Sandwell Unemployment and comprised the BNP Stewards’ Group soon adopted the Community Resource Centre in November). However, name Combat 18 (C18), its numerology signifying their these remained