N identical particles and one particle to entangle them all Bruno Bellomo,1 Rosario Lo Franco,2, 3, ∗ and Giuseppe Compagno3 1Institut UTINAM - UMR 6213, CNRS, Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers THETA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France 2Dipartimento di Energia, Ingegneria dell’Informazione e Modelli Matematici, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy 3Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Università di Palermo, via Archirafi 36, 90123 Palermo, Italy (Dated: September 4, 2018) In quantum information W states are a central class of multipartite entangled states because of their robustness against noise and use in many quantum processes. Their generation however remains a demanding task whose difficulty increases with the number of particles. We report a simple scalable conceptual scheme where a single particle in an ancilla mode works as entanglement catalyst of W state for other N separated identical particles. A crucial novel aspect of the scheme, which exploits basically spatial indistinguishability, is its universality, being applicable without essential changes to both bosons and fermions. Our proposal represents a new paradigm within experimental preparation of many-particle entanglement based on quantum indistinguishability. I. INTRODUCTION states with the largest number of particles observed in the lab- oratory consist of eight two-level trapped ions [51], while for Quantum entanglement represents nonclassical correlations instance this number is lowered to four particles for polarized among constituents of composite systems which make them photons [50]. A key step towards simpler reliable generation intertwined independently of how far they are each other protocols is to find conceptual schemes based on fundamen- [1]. It is well established that entanglement is essential as tal mechanisms valid for general systems. Since distributed a resource by local operations and classical communication quantum networks are typically made of identical particles (LOCC) for implementing quantum information, computation (e.g., electrons, atoms, photons, nuclei, quantum dots), a nat- and communication [2, 3]. Generation and control of en- ural candidate to act as basic entangling resource is quantum tanglement in many-particle networks is thus very important indistinguishability of the particles themselves [32, 56–59]. from both theoretical and practical perspectives. A peculiar In this work we introduce a universal conceptual scheme, aspect is that there are states, like GHZ [4], W [4, 5], clus- valid for both bosons and fermions, which creates a W state of ter [6] and Dicke [7], which belong to inequivalent classes of N separated identical particles by exploiting only their spatial multipartite entanglement because they cannot be transformed indistinguishability and random destination sources. The key into each other by LOCC [8, 9]. Despite the exhaustive knowl- ingredient is supplied by a single particle staying in an ancilla edge about bipartite entanglement, creation and characteriza- spatial mode which, after postselection at a given step of the tion of multipartite entanglement remain challenging and de- protocol, serves as an entanglement catalyst for other N par- bated [4, 5, 10]. ticles. The number of circuital elements scales linearly with Intense study has then focused on understanding the role as the number of particles, which are initially independent and a resource in a given process of the different classes of mul- uncorrelated. Simplicity and generality of the scheme with re- tipartite entanglement [4]. In this context, W states emerge spect to previous proposals based on indistinguishability make as a particularly important class. Their entanglement is maxi- it a novel promising blueprint for experimental generation of mally robust against both noise and particle loss [6, 11], which many-particle entanglement in different contexts, from quan- makes nonclassical effects stronger for W states than for GHZ tum optics to solid state and condensed matter. states for large number of particles [12]. Furthermore, W Following a recent nonstandard particle-based approach to states are central in quantum computation [13], secure quan- treat identical particles without using labels [56], we indicate tum communication [14–18], teleportation [18–20], quantum an elementary pure state of a N-particle composite system by arXiv:1704.06359v2 [quant-ph] 22 Aug 2017 heat engines [21] and quantum key distribution [22]. Design- j'1;'2;:::;'N i, which represents a particle in the state '1, ing [22–47] and realizing [48–55] production schemes of this a particle in '2 and so on. Such a state is in general an indivis- class of multipartite states has thus attracted great attention. ible object whose normalization constant is to be determined The many theoretical proposals for generating W states by single-particle probability amplitudes (see Appendix A). work for specific systems and require in general precise Each single-particle state is characterized by a spatial mode, control of interparticle and particle-environment interactions, indicated with a capital letter (e.g., M), and a given pseudospin nonlocal external operations, initially entangled photon pairs, σ, whose basis in a given direction is denoted by fj"i ; j#ig. fusion of previously created W states with ancilla photons and An aspect of this formalism is that, when each particle of a complex network gates [22–47]. Combinations of these requi- subsystem is spatially separated from the particles in the other sites make the implementation very demanding. So far the W subsystems and only under local measurements, the overall el- ementary state of indistinguishable particles can be written as a tensor (separable) product of subsystem states [56]. Under these assumptions the cluster decomposition principle, stating ∗ [email protected] that distant experiments yield independent results, holds [60] 2 is obtained from the global state with probability P = (N+1) (N+1) 2 N C jhΦp jΦ ij = 1=2 (see Appendix B). The parti- cle present in the i-th intermediate mode Ci (i = 1;:::;N) is C successively sent to a common ancilla mode C, which deter- C1 Ci CN Postselection ministically leads to the final state p (N+1) jΨ i = (1= N)(jC #; M2 #;:::; MN #; M1 "i W state + jM1 #; C #;:::; MN #; M2 "i + ::: + jM1 #; M2 #;:::; C #; MN "i): (3) M1 Mi MN Using the symmetrization rule with respect to the swapping of single-particle state positions (see Eq. (A2) of Appendix A), M1 Mi MN taking into account that the particle in mode C is separated from the other particles and assuming LOCC from now on, the state of Eq. (3) can be written as a tensor product of an N-particle state and a single-particle state as (N+1) FIG. 1. Ancilla mode-based scheme with N + 1 identical parti- jΨ i ≡ η jWN i ⊗ jC #i ; (4) cles. N identical particles with pseudospin # are equally split in two separated modes while the one with pseudospin " is equally split into where η = ±1 for bosons and fermions, respectively, and the modes Mi (i = 1;:::;N). For convenience, in the left panel the particles are placed at the network nodes (triangles). After postselec- jWN i = (jM1 "; M2 #; M3 #;:::; MN #i tion and reaching C, a W state is generated among the pseudospins + jM1 #; M2 "; M3 #;:::; MN #i + ::: of N particles in modes M1;:::; MN . p + jM1 #; M2 #; M3 #;:::; MN "i)= N: (5) and the identical particles behave like distinguishable individ- The protocol therefore creates a N-particle W state jWN i ually addressable ones. among the pseudospins of N particles in separated modes M1;:::; MN , which is a superposition of states such that N − 1 particles have pseudospin j#i and one has j"i [4]. II. N-PARTICLE W STATE GENERATION Within the resource theory of LOCC, jWN i represents a gen- uine multipartite entangled state among N individually ad- We take a system of N + 1 indistinguishable particles, ini- dressable identical particles. tially uncorrelated and spatially separated, where N particles The scheme above equally works for both bosons and have pseudospin # and one pseudospin ". The overall initial fermions. However, we point out that for fermions the state (N+1) (N+1) jΨ i of Eq. (4), and thus jWN i, can be achieved more (normalized) state is jΦ0 i = jA1 #; A2 #;:::; AN+1 "i. Each particle then goes to a network node, as illustrated in efficiently by performing the postselection on modes Mi after Fig. 1, after which the (normalized) global state is the particles are distributed among the common mode C and the modes Mi, that means Ci = C in Eq. (2). We indicate (N+1) (N+1) jΦ i = j'1;'2;:::;'N+1i ; (1) with jΦf i the state of Eq. (1) under this condition. In (N+1) the fermion linear expansion of jΦf i, all the terms where where the N particles in # and the N + 1-th particle in " are mode C would appear more than one time are forbidden by the transformed, respectively, as Pauli exclusion principle. As a consequence, the probability p to obtain jΨ(N+1)i from the global state is now (see Appendix j' i = (jM #i + jC #i)= 2; (i = 1; 2;:::;N) i i i (N+1) (N+1) 2 N B) Pf = jhΨ jΦf ij = 1=(N + 1) (linear scaling) X p N j'N+1i = jMi "i = N: (2) against Pb = P = 1=2 (exponential scaling) for bosons. i=1 We also notice that, in the case of bosons, performing post- selection when particles are distributed among the common The nodes of the network preparing these orthonormal one- ancilla mode C and the modes Mi, would decrease the suc- particle states are random destination sources behaving like PN cess probability to 1=[ m=0 N!=(N − m)!], which decays beam-splitters [61] (we shall later discuss the experimental much faster than 1=2N (see Appendix B). The probabilities implementation).