Cauchy Integral Theorem

Cauchy Integral Theorem

Cauchy’s Theorems I

Ang M.S.

Augustin-Louis Cauchy
1789 – 1857

October 26, 2012

References

Murray R. Spiegel Complex V ariables with introduction to conformal mapping and its applications Dennis G. Zill , P. D. Shanahan A First Course in Complex Analysis with Applications J. H. Mathews , R. W. Howell Complex Analysis For Mathematics and Engineerng

1 Summary

• Cauchy Integral Theorem

Let f be analytic in a simply connected domain D. If C is a simple closed contour that lies in D , and there is no singular point inside the contour, then

ˆ

f (z) dz = 0

C

• Cauchy Integral Formula (For simple pole)

If there is a singular point z0 inside the contour, then

˛

f(z)

dz = 2πj f(z0) z − z0

• Generalized Cauchy Integral Formula (For pole with any order)

˛

f(z)

(z − z0)n
2πj

  • dz =
  • f

(n−1) (z0)

(n − 1)!

• Cauchy Inequality

  • ꢀ
  • ꢀ

ꢀ

M · n!

(n)

ꢀ

f

(z0) ≤

rn

• Gauss Mean Value Theorem

ˆ

2π

  • (
  • )

1f(z0) =

f z0 + rejθ dθ
2π

0

1

2 Related Mathematics Review

2.1 Stoke’s Theorem

  • ¨
  • ˛

  • ¯
  • ¯

  • ∇ × F · dS =
  • F · dr

  • Σ
  • ∂Σ

(The proof is skipped)

¯

Consider F = (FX , FY , FZ)

xˆ

∂

yˆ

∂

zˆ

∂



¯



∇ × F = det

∂x ∂y ∂z

FX FY FZ

Let FZ = 0

xˆ

∂

yˆ

∂

zˆ

∂




¯
∇ × F = det

∂x ∂y ∂z

FX FY

0
¯

dS = nˆdS , for dS = dxdy , nˆ = zˆ . By zˆ · zˆ = 1 , consider zˆ component only for ∇ × F

xˆ

∂

  • yˆ
  • zˆ

∂

  • (
  • )




  • ∂
  • ∂FY

∂x
∂FX
∂y

¯
∇ × F = det
=

−

zˆ

∂x ∂y ∂z

FX FY

0

i.e.

  • (
  • )

  • ¨
  • ¨

∂FY
∂x
∂FX
∂y

¯

∇ × F · dS =

−

dxdy

  • Σ
  • Σ

Consider the RHS (let FZ = 0)

  • ˛
  • ˛
  • ˛

¯

F · dr =

  • (FX, FY , FZ) · (dx, dy, dz) =
  • FXdx + FY dy

  • ∂Σ
  • ∂Σ
  • ∂Σ

Thus

  • (
  • )

  • ¨
  • ˛

∂FY
∂x
∂FX
∂y

−

  • dxdy =
  • FXdx + FY dy

  • Σ
  • ∂Σ

2.2 Cauchy-Reimann Condition

For f(z) = u(z) + jv(z) = u(x, y) + jv(x, y)

The complex derivative is

f (z0 + h) − f(z0)

  • lim
  • = f ′ (z0)

hh → 0

h ∈ C

If the limit exists.
2
If the limit exists, limits along real axis should be the same the limit along imaginary axis

f (z0 + h) − f (z0)

∂f (z0)

1 ∂f (z0)

f (z0 + jh) − f (z0)

  • lim
  • =
  • =
  • =
  • lim

  • h
  • ∂x
  • j
  • ∂y
  • jh

  • h → 0
  • h → 0

  • h ∈ R
  • h ∈ R

i.e. The Cauchy-Riemann Equation

∂f (z0)

1 ∂f (z0)
=

  • ∂x
  • j
  • ∂y

Expand

∂

1 ∂

  • [u (x0, y0) + jv (x0, y0)] =
  • [u (x0, y0) + jv (x0, y0)]

  • ∂x
  • j ∂y

Equalize real part and imaginary part

  • ∂
  • ∂



  • u (x0, y0) =
  • v (x0, y0)

∂x ∂
∂y
∂



v (x0, y0) = − u (x0, y0)

  • ∂x
  • ∂y

Or simply as

∂u ∂x
∂v ∂y



=

  • ∂v
  • ∂u



= −

  • ∂x
  • ∂y

i.e. If f(z) is analytic, then it fulfill this condition

2.3 ML Inequality

First,

  • ˆ
  • ˆ

  • b
  • b

if g(x) ≤ f(x) , then

  • g(x)dx ≤
  • f(x)dx

  • a
  • a

This is true if

  • sup g(x) ≤ sup f(x)
  • inf g(x) ≤ inf f(x)

Then for any function f , it is true that

−|f| ≤ f ≤ |f|

Then apply the inequality above ,

  • ˆ
  • ˆ
  • ˆ

b

−

  • b |f(x)|dx ≤
  • f(x)dx ≤ b |f(x)|dx

  • a
  • a
  • a

Now is the time to show , for bounded f(z) , i.e. |f(z)| ≤ M ,

  • ꢀ
  • ꢀ

ˆ

ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ

f(z)dz ≤ ML

ꢀ

c

3
Pf.

  • ´
  • ´

b

By using the b f(x)dx ≤ |f(x)|dx

  • a
  • a

ꢀ

ˆ

ꢀ

ˆ

ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ

f(z)dz ≤ |f(z)|dz

ꢀ

  • c
  • c

Since f(z) si bounded,

  • ꢀ
  • ꢀ

  • ˆ
  • ˆ
  • ˆ
  • ˆ

ꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ

  • f(z)dz ≤ |f(z)|dz ≤ Mdz = M
  • dz = ML

ꢀ

  • c
  • c
  • c
  • C

| {z }

L

Therefore

ˆ

f(z)dz| ≤ ML

  • |
  • |

c

3 The Cauchy Theorem

f(z) = u(x, y) + jv(x, y)

  • ˛
  • ˛
  • ˛
  • ˛

  • f (z) dz =
  • [u (x, y) + jv (x, y)] [dx + jdv] =
  • udx − vdy + j
  • vdx + udy

  • C
  • C
  • C
  • C

3.1 The Real Part

Let FX = u (x, y) FY = −u (x, y) and consider the real part of the integral

  • ˛
  • ˛

udx − vdy = FXdx + FY dy

C

By the Stoke’ Theorem

  • ˛
  • ¨
  • ¨

udx + (−v)dy =

[(−v)x − uy] dxdy =

[−vx − uy] dxdy

C

Since the function is analytic in the region D , ⇐⇒ the function fulfill Cauchy-Reimann Condition

∂v ∂x
∂u ∂y

= −

Then

  • ¨
  • ¨

[−vx − uy] dxdy =

[uy − uy] dxdy = 0

´

The real part of C f(z)dz equal zero
4

3.2 The imaginary part

´

Consider the imaginary part of C f(z)dz ,

˛

vdx + udy

C

Let FX be v(x, y) and FY be u(x, y) , and apply Stoke’s Theorem

  • ˛
  • ¨

  • vdx + udy =
  • (ux − vy) dxdy

C

∂u ∂x
∂v ∂y

As the function is analytic, so it fulfill Cauchy-Reimann Condition : become zero

=

, thus the integral
Finally, Let f be analytic in a simply connected domain D , for the simple closed contour C that lies in D , the close contour integral equal zero

ˆ

f (z) dz = 0

C

4 The Cauchy Integral Formulas

4.1 Simple Pole

˛

g (z) dz = 2πjg (z0) z − z0

C

Condition • z0 inside C , if z0is outside C , then the integral is just zero • g(z) is analytic in simply connected domain ⇐⇒ domain of g(z) is simply connect closed region, and g(z) fulfill CR-Condition there

Proof. Consider the diagram

g(z)

, the integral of

By concept of path deformation z − z0

along path C that ϵ → 0 along path C is equivalent to the integral

ϵ

  • ˛
  • ˛

  • g(z)
  • g(z)

dz = lim

dz

ϵ→0

  • z − z0
  • z − z0

C

Cϵ

The small circle inside can be expressed as

|z − z0| = ϵejθ 0 ≤ θ < 2π

As the radius ϵ → 0+ , the circle is thus

z − z0 = ϵejθ 0 ≤ θ < 2π

5
Put this back into the integral

  • (
  • )

  • ˛
  • ˛
  • ˆ

g z0 + ϵejθ

(z0 + ϵejθ) − z0

2π

  • (
  • )

  • g(z)
  • g(z)

  • dz = lim
  • dz = lim

d z0 + ϵejθ

  • ϵ→0
  • ϵ→0

  • z − z0
  • z − z0

C

Cϵ

0

  • (
  • )

  • ˆ
  • ˆ

2π

(

g z0 + ϵejθ

2π

)

= lim

  • jϵejθdθ = jlim
  • g z0 + ϵejθ dθ

ϵejθ

  • ϵ→0
  • ϵ→0

  • 0
  • 0

  • ˆ
  • ˆ
  • ˆ

  • [
  • ]

)

  • 2π
  • 2π
  • 2π

(

= j

  • limg z0 + ϵejθ dθ = j
  • g (z0) dθ = jg (z0)
  • dθ = 2πjg (z0)

ϵ→0

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

∴

˛

g(z)

dz = 2πjg (z0) z − z0

C

4.2 Generalized Cauchy Integral Formula

˛

  • f (z0)
  • 2πj

  • dz =
  • 2πj f(n−1) (z0)

(z − z0)n

(n − 1)!

First, the Cauchy Integral Formula for simple pole is

˛

g (z) dz = 2πjg (z0) z − z0

C

(

on both side Not

˛

)

  • d
  • d

Take

!

  • dz0
  • dz

˛

g (z)

⇒

  • d
  • g (z)
  • d
  • 2πj

  • dz = 2πj
  • g (z0)
  • dz =

g′ (z0)

(z − z0)2

  • dz0
  • z − z0
  • dz0

1!

  • C
  • C

Repeat,

  • ˛
  • ˛

g (z)

⇒

  • d
  • g (z)

(z − z0)2

g (z)
(z − z0)3

  • 2πj d
  • 2πj

dz =

g′ (z0)

dz =

g” (z0)

(z − z0)3 dz0

  • 1! dz0
  • 2!

  • C
  • C

  • ˛
  • ˛

g (z)

⇒

  • d
  • 2πj d
  • 2πj

dz =

g” (z0)

  • dz =
  • g

(3) (z0)

(z − z0)4 dz0

  • 1! dz0
  • 3!

  • C
  • C

Thus, the general form of Cauchy Integral Formula is

˛

  • g (z)
  • 2πj

  • dz =
  • g

(n−1) (z0)

(z − z0)n

(n − 1)!

C

This can be proved using Mathematical Induction.
6

5 Consequences of Cauchy’s Integral Formula

5.1 Cauchy Inequality

The generalized Cauchy Integral Formula is

˛

f (z)

(z − z0)n+1

2πj

  • dz =
  • f

(n) (z0)

n!

C

Take absolute value

  • ꢀ
  • ꢀ

ꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀꢀ

  • ꢀ
  • ꢀ

ꢀ

  • ˛
  • ˛

  • ꢀ
  • ꢀ

ꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ
ꢀꢀ

f (z)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us