The-Potential-Of-The-Lisbon-Treaty.Pdf

The-Potential-Of-The-Lisbon-Treaty.Pdf

1 Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 2 RESEARCH TEAM .............................................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1. KEY FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1. AIM OF THE STUDY ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2. 2. SCOPE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................................10 2.3. METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................................................11 3. THE NEW SHARING OF POWER WITHIN THE EU: ANY IMPACT ON MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE IN THE NETHERLANDS? ...................................................................................................12 3.1. A CLEARER DISTRIBUTION OF POWER AT THE EU LEVEL : THE PRINCIPLE OF CONFERRAL AS THE CORNERSTONE FOR DELIMITATING COMPETENCES ..........................................................................................12 3.2. MULTI -LEVEL GOVERNANCE IN THE NETHERLANDS ...................................................................................14 4. NOVELTIES REGARDING EU INSTITUTIONS AND THE NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS IN THE EU LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: SOME POTENTIALS FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES ....22 4.1. A MORE OPEN EUROPEAN COMMISSION ....................................................................................................22 4.2. THE REINFORCED ROLE OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS IN THE SUBSIDIARITY CHECK ...................................24 4.3. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT BECOMES A CO -LEGISLATOR WITH THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS .............29 4.4. THE NEW QUALIFIED MAJORITY VOTING IN THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS ..................................................32 4.5. NEW RIGHT TO GO TO THE COURT AND OTHER NOVELTIES FOR THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS .......34 4.6. THE END OF THE EU PILLAR STRUCTURE : AN EXTENDED COMPETENCE FOR THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION .......................................................................................................................................37 5. A NEW TYPOLOGY OF EU ACTS AND ITS IMPACTS ON THE POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES IN THE EU DECISION-MAKING PROCESS .......................39 5.1. ADOPTION OF EU LEGISLATIVE ACTS : THE ORDINARY LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE AND THE SPECIAL LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................................40 5.2. ADOPTION OF EU NON -LEGISLATIVE ACTS : THE DELEGATED ACTS AND THE IMPLEMENTING ACTS ........42 5.3. RESTRICTION OF COMITOLOGY ’S SCOPE AND IMPACT ON THE POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES ...........................................................................................................................................47 5.4. INFRINGEMENT OF EU LAW / NON -LEGALITY OF AN EU ACT : WHAT ROLE FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES ? ....................................................................................................................................................48 6. A STRENGTHENED RECOGNITION OF THE ROLE OF THE REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES WITHIN THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESS....................................................53 6.1. THE RECOGNITION OF THE REGIONAL AND LOCAL DIMENSIONS OF THE SUBSIDIARITY PRINCIPLE ...........53 6.2. RESPECT FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL SELF -GOVERNMENT & CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY .......54 6.3. INSERTION OF ‘TERRITORIAL COHESION ’ IN THE EU OBJECTIVES ..............................................................55 6.4. IMPROVEMENTS REGARDING THE EU OUTERMOST REGIONS ’ STATUS ......................................................57 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................59 7.1. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................59 7.2. RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................................60 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................64 ANNEX 1: TABLE ON THE MAIN CHANGES BROUGHT BY THE LISBON TREATY INTO THE EUROPEAN TREATIES ............................................................................................................................................................................64 2 ANNEX 2: THE DIVISION OF COMPETENCES IN THE NETHERLANDS ................................................................70 ANNEX 3: EU POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS : INVOLVING PROVINCES AND MUNICIPALITIES ..........................74 ANNEX 4: SUBSIDIARITY CHECK IN THE NETHERLANDS ..................................................................................77 ANNEX 5: THE NEW QUALIFIED MAJORITY VOTING IN THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS .......................................80 ANNEX 6: EIPA QUESTIONNAIRE SENT IN APRIL 2010 ...................................................................................83 ANNEX 7: PERSONS TO WHOM THE EIPA QUESTIONNAIRE WAS SENT IN APRIL 2010 ..................................86 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................................87 OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHERS ..................................................................................................................87 ACADEMIC ARTICLES /RESOURCES .....................................................................................................................90 PRESS ARTICLES ................................................................................................................................................91 USEFUL LINKS .....................................................................................................................................................91 3 Research team Gracia Vara Arribas (ES), Director of the Study , Expert EIPA-ECR, BARCELONA Delphine Bourdin (FR), External expert, BRUSSELS Bert Immerzeel (NL), External translator and research assistant, BARCELONA Martin Unfried (DE), Expert EIPA, MAASTRICHT Advisor at the Dutch provincial level: Paul Baeten (NL), Representative from the Province of Limburg, Head of the Strategy Department and Member of the Provincial team of Directors, MAASTRICHT 4 List of abbreviations In correct alphabetical order AER: Assembly of European Regions BNC : Dutch Working Group for the Assessment of New Commission Proposals BZK : Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations CAP: Common Agricultural Policy CEMR : Committee of European Municipalities and Regions CFSP: Common Foreign and Security Policy CIVEX: CoR Commission for Citizenship, Governance, Institutional and External Affairs CJEU : Court of Justice of the European Union CLRAE: Congress of Local and Regional Authorities in Europe (Council of Europe) CoCo : Coordination Committee for European Integration and Association Studies CoR : Committee of the Regions COSAC : Conference of Community and European Affairs Committees of Parliaments of the European Union EABB: European Agenda Binnenlands Bestuur EC : European Commission ECB: European Central Bank ECJ: European Court of Justice ECSC : European Coal and Steel Community EESC : European Economic and Social Committee EGTC : European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation ENVE: CoR Commission for the Environment, Climate Change and Energy EOBB: Europa Overleg Binnenlands Bestuur EP : European Parliament EU : European Union EURATOM: European Community for Atomic Energy EWS : Early Warning System HNP : House of the Dutch Provinces IPO : Dutch Interprovincial Assembly (Interprovinciaal Overleg) LNV: “Landbouw, Natuur, Voedselkwaliteit”, Dutch Ministry of Agriculture MEP : Member of the European Parliament MS : Member States NL : The Netherlands QM : Qualified Majority QMV : Qualified Majority Voting RLAs : Regional and Local Authorities RPS : Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny SMN : Subsidiarity Monitoring Network (CoR) TEC: Treaty on the European Communities TEU : Treaty on the European Union TFEU : Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union VNG : Association of the Netherlands’ Municipalities (Vereniging van Nederlandse Gemeenten) VROM : Dutch Ministry of the Environment 5 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Key

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    91 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us