Virgin queen execution in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii: The sign stimulus for worker attacks Stefan Jarau, Johan W. van Veen, Ingrid Aguilar, Manfred Ayasse To cite this version: Stefan Jarau, Johan W. van Veen, Ingrid Aguilar, Manfred Ayasse. Virgin queen execution in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii: The sign stimulus for worker attacks. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2009, 40 (4), 10.1051/apido/2009022. hal-00891991 HAL Id: hal-00891991 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00891991 Submitted on 1 Jan 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 40 (2009) 496–507 Available online at: c INRA/DIB-AGIB/EDP Sciences, 2009 www.apidologie.org DOI: 10.1051/apido/2009022 Original article Virgin queen execution in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii: The sign stimulus for worker attacks* Stefan Jarau1, Johan W. Van Veen2, Ingrid Aguilar2, Manfred Ayasse1 1 Institute for Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany 2 Center for Tropical Bee Research (CINAT), National University of Costa Rica, PO Box 475-3000, Heredia, Costa Rica Received 5 June 2008 – Revised 22 December 2008 – Accepted 21 January 2009 Abstract – Stingless bees produce considerable numbers of virgin queens over the year, most of which are superfluous and get executed by the workers. Nothing is known yet about the sign stimulus that releases the worker attacks. In the present study we investigated the queen execution process in Melipona beecheii and found in both behavioral observations and experiments with caged living virgin queens that workers are not attracted to them from a distance by means of volatile chemicals. Furthermore, worker aggression, which is obvious towards virgin queens that run through the nest excitedly with their abdomen enlarged and the wings beating, was lowered to almost zero when we made the queens “behavior-less” by experimen- tally killing them. Our results clearly show that the sign stimulus for releasing the execution behavior in Melipona beecheii workers is not a chemical stimulus but the virgin queens’ conspicuous behavior, which, we hypothesize, could act as a direct measure of their fitness. stingless bee / Melipona beecheii / virgin queen execution / queen behavior / worker attacks 1. INTRODUCTION Honey bees usually produce new queens only when a daughter colony is to be split off the One hallmark of eusocial insect societies mother colony and in the case of accidental is the reproductive division of labor (Wilson, loss or replacement of an old queen (Mich- 1971). In nests of the advanced eusocial honey ener, 1974). Honey bee workers can easily de- bees (Apidae, Apini) and stingless bees (Api- cide when to rear a queen, because they con- dae, Meliponini) two morphologically distinct stantly feed the developing larvae and there- female castes are always present (Michener, fore can provide young larvae with special 1974). These are the queens that lay (almost) food, known as “royal jelly”, that triggers all fertile eggs and the workers, which in queen development whenever needed (En- some species can produce fertile eggs from gels and Imperatriz-Fonseca, 1990; Kucharski which males develop but never directly pro- et al., 2008). By contrast, stingless bees mass duce female offspring. A crucial condition for provision their brood cells and close them af- the functioning and endurance of a colony, ter the queen’s oviposition (Michener, 1974). therefore, is the continuous presence of a There is no direct contact between the work- fertile physogastric queen that lays a suf- ers and the developing larvae, which ren- ficient amount of eggs to produce at least ders an emergency queen rearing as in honey ffi all of the nest’s worker- and queen progeny. bees di cult. The only known cases where emergency queens are produced in stingless Corresponding author: S. Jarau, bees are Trigona (Frieseomelitta) varia, Trigo- [email protected] nisca (Leurotrigona) muelleri,andTrigonisca * Manuscript editor: Yves Le Conte (Celetrigona) longicornis, where workers can Article published by EDP Sciences Virgin queen execution in Melipona beecheii 497 provide larvae with extra food deposited in observations (i) that many virgin queens of M. auxiliary cells (Faustino et al., 2002). In gen- favosa escaped the worker aggression by leav- eral, however, stingless bees produce excess ing the nest and (ii) that some virgin queens virgin queens year round, probably in order succeeded in entering other nests of the same to prevent a queenless situation (Michener, species. The authors hypothesized that worker 1974; Sakagami, 1982). In most taxa queens inclusive fitness could be increased by the de- are reared in royal cells that are larger than parture of non-accepted virgin queens when worker cells and contain a larger amount of they reproduce outside their maternal nest. larval food. Therefore, castes are likely de- Whether these queens actually can take over termined trophically, with larvae receiving a foreign nests and reproduce in them, however, larger amount of food developing into queens remains to be demonstrated. (Sakagami, 1982). In Melipona,however, queens develop in normal sized cells within In M. beecheii, virgin queens are active im- the brood comb, just as workers and males mediately after emerging from the brood cell, do. The mechanism of caste determination in and they try to avoid worker aggression by Melipona is not clear, and hypotheses range running to the nest’s periphery where they from a genetic determination, probably influ- hide (van Veen et al., 1999; Moo-Valle et al., enced by environmental and nutritional factors 2004). The same behavior was observed in M. (e.g., Kerr, 1948, 1950, 1969, 1974), to the quadrifasciata anthidioides (Silva et al., 1972) assumption that individuals completely con- and M. marginata (Kleinert and Imperatriz- trol their own caste fate, and thus can selfishly Fonseca, 1994). Once a virgin queen starts to develop into queens (e.g., Bourke and Rat- run over the brood combs with her abdomen nieks, 1999; Ratnieks, 2001; Wenseleers et al., inflated and her wings vibrating, which likely 2003) (see also review by Hartfelder et al., is related to her attempt to become accepted 2006). Regardless of the mode of caste deter- as a new queen, workers attack and try to kill mination the fate of virgin queens in queen her (Sakagami and Oniki, 1963; Silva et al., right, non-swarming stingless bee colonies 1972; Koedam et al., 1995; van Veen et al., is the same – the workers execute them 1999; Wenseleers et al., 2004; Kleinert, 2005). some time after their emergence (Engels and Despite the many behavioral observations of Imperatriz-Fonseca, 1990; Imperatriz-Fonseca the queen execution process in stingless bees, and Zucchi, 1995). This process is partic- nothing is known about how workers distin- ularly conspicuous in Melipona,wherethe guish virgin queens from workers, or about number of emerging queens is very high, the stimuli exhibited by virgin queens that usually being several percent of the female trigger the attacks against them, respectively. progeny (Kerr, 1948, 1950, 1969;Kerrand Queen production, i.e. the process by which Nielsen, 1966;Kerretal.,1966; Darchen and new queens are reared and chosen from among Delage-Darchen, 1975; Koedam, 1999;van the available gynes, is undoubtedly a target Veen, 2000; Moo-Valle et al., 2001, 2004; of natural selection, because queens are of Sommeijer et al., 2003a; Wenseleers et al., great importance to the inclusive fitness of all 2004;Moraisetal.,2006; Santos-Filho et al., colony members (Tarpy and Gilley, 2004). In 2006). Furthermore, Melipona excess virgin order to understand the mechanism by which a queens are killed within a few hours or days new queen is selected by a group of workers following their emergence from the brood during the queen elimination stage of queen cells (Kerr et al., 1962; Sakagami and Oniki, production (Tarpy and Gilley, 2004), however, 1963; Sakagami et al., 1965; Silva et al., one has to know the proximate mechanism 1972; Kleinert and Imperatriz-Fonseca, 1994; by which the virgin queens are recognized or Koedam et al., 1995; van Veen et al., 1999; which triggers the aggression towards them. Wenseleers et al., 2004). Sommeijer et al. Ultimately, the determination of the trigger for (2003b, c) proposed an interesting alternative the aggressive worker behavior may lead to explanation for the large number of virgin an understanding of the evolution of virgin queens produced in Melipona based ontheir queen life history and help to understand why 498 S. Jarau et al. Melipona colonies produce such large num- inner space) containing one brood comb with ap- bers of virgins. proximately 200 cells and 25–30 adult worker bees. Many recognition systems in solitary and The boxes were covered with glass sheets in order social insects, including the recognition of to allow observations of the bees’ behavior and to dominance status and possibly caste in euso- register the emergence of virgin queens. All experi- cial species, are mediated by differences in ments described below were carried out in these ob- the odor compound composition on the cu- servation boxes, filmed under red light with a video ticle surfaces of different individuals (e.g., camera (Panasonic NV-GS 200 EG-S DV), and the Howard and Blomquist, 1982, 2005; Singer, respective analyses were done from the video tapes. 1998; Monnin, 2005; Sramkova et al., 2008). Differences in the composition of volatile con- 2.2.