Successful Biological Control of Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, by Introduced Insects in Oregon Peter Mcevoy

Successful Biological Control of Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, by Introduced Insects in Oregon Peter Mcevoy

Successful Biological Control of Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, by Introduced Insects in Oregon Peter McEvoy; Caroline Cox; Eric Coombs Ecological Applications, Vol. 1, No. 4. (Nov., 1991), pp. 430-442. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1051-0761%28199111%291%3A4%3C430%3ASBCORS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y Ecological Applications is currently published by Ecological Society of America. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/esa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Fri Aug 24 14:12:35 2007 SUCCESSFUL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF RAGWORT, SENECIO JACOBAEA, BY INTRODUCED INSECTS IN OREGON1 PETERMCEVOY AND CAROLINECOX Department of Entomology, Oregon State Cnrversrty. Corvallrs. Oregon 97331 C'S.4 ERICCOOMBS It eed Control Drvrsron, Oregon Depurtrnent of Agrrculture, Saletn, Oregon 97310 CS,4 .Abstract. The purpose of our study was to estimate the variability in a biological control process on a regional scale, identify its causes. and quantitatively evaluate overall control success. We present evidence of the success of biological control of Senecio jacobaea (ragwort) in western Oregon following introduction of three natural enemies. First, obser- vations from a single site showed that ragwort declined to < 1% of its former abundance and has been replaced by a plant community composed predominantly of introduced perennial grasses. Second. a perturbation experiment showed that introduced insects, within one ragwort generation, can depress the density, biomass, and reproduction of ragwort to < 1% of populations protected from natural enemies. Third. a 12-yr survey of 42 ragwort populations showed that strong and persistent depression of ragwort recurred at many sites and at different times. Three features of this case history may be useful in the development of ecological theory as an explanation and guide for biological control: (1) the impact of the natural enemies depends on the distribution of individual sizes and ages in the ragwort population; (2) the long-term dynamics of ragwort may be influenced by the presence of a large persistent seed bank which is invulnerable to the natural enemies; and (3) the success of biological control of ragwort in western Oregon appears to be independent of variation in environmental conditions. Combining local, short-term experiments and regional long-term observations is a powerful method for demonstrating successful biological control. K~,J.vvor(ls: brological control; envrronrnentul vuriation; Hylemya seneciella; Longitarsus jaco- baeae; perturbatron experiment; populution dynamics; regional survey: seed banks; Senecio jacobaea; stage structure; Tyna jacobaeae; weds; western Oregon. INTRODUCTION plementation of future projects, provides understand- Classical biological weed control involves the intro- ing that can increase their success (Andres et al. 1976), duction of exotic natural enemies (e.g.. phytophagous and encourages wider use of biological weed control as insects. nematodes, and pathogens) to reduce the abun- an alternative to chemical herbicides. dance of a plant that has become a pest when spread Here we offer evidence of successful biological con- outside of its native range without its native herbi- trol of tansy ragwort, Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae), vores. The practical aims of biological weed control following introduction of three biologcal control agents: programs are to achieve and maintain low population 7:vria jacobaeae (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), the cinnabar levels of the weed and to foster replacement of the weed moth: Longitarsus jacobaeae (Coleoptera: Chrysomel- with more desirable vegetation. idae), the ragwort flea beetle: and H~demyaseneciella Biological weed-control programs are manipulations (Diptera: Anthomiidae), the ragwort seed fly. (The ge- on a grand scale involving relatively few species. Proper nus Hylernya is currently undergoing revision.) monitoring and detailed evaluation of these programs Smith and DeBach (1942) described three types of can benefit both ecology and the practice of biological evidence which, in combination, are adequate to doc- control. Ecologists gain valuable information on pop- ument the success of a biological control program: (1) ulation regulation. the dynamics of interactions within introduction of the natural enemy in several locations and between trophic levels, and species invasions is followed by a reduction in pest populations: (2) pest (Harper 1977, Crawley 1983, May and Hassell 1988). populations remain at a low level following establish- Biological control practitioners gain evidence of the ment of the natural enemy: and (3) survivorship of pest success of their programs. which encourages the im- populations is higher when protected from attack by the natural enemy than when exposed. Although the importance of obtaining data that satisfy these criteria I Manuscript received 19 October 1990; revised 6 February has been emphasized (for example, DeBach et al. 1976, 199 1 : accepted 7 February 199 1. Harper 1977. McEvoy 1985. Luck et al. 1988). few November 1991 SUCCESSFUL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF RAGWORT 431 biological weed-control programs have been docu- The cinnabar moth was introduced as a biological mented completely. Crawley (1 989a) reviewed 627 bi- control agent from France and released in northern ological weed-control programs and found that few California by the United States Department of Agri- provided an objective measure of the depression of culture (USDA) in 1959. It was first released in Oregon weed abundance. Exceptions are the successful control in Linn and Polk Counties in 1960 (Isaacson 1973b). of Hypericum perforatum by two introduced leaf bee- Since that time, the Oregon Department of Agriculture tles (Huffaker and Kennett 1959) and of Tribulus ter- (0DA)'s biological control program has made >3500 restris by two introduced weevils (Huffaker et al. 1983). releases in 17 counties throughout ragwort's range in We present observations at a single site, data from western Oregon. Dempster (1982) has reviewed cin- a perturbation experiment, and the results of a regional nabar moth biology. The moth is univoltine. Adults survey. Together, these data offer evidence for Smith emerge in late spring from overwintering pupae and and DeBach's three criteria that is more detailed, and lay clusters of eggs on the undersides of the basal leaves more closely meets current standards for studies of of large ragwort rosettes or flowering plants. The first population dynamics, than that outlined by Smith and instar skeletonizes these leaves. During the next four DeBach (1 942). To demonstrate that the first criterion instars the caterpillars move to the apex of the plant, has been satisfied, we describe the depression of a Se- consume the developing floral parts, and then strip the necio jacobaea population on the central Oregon coast leaves, leaving bare petioles. Older larvae are com- following introduction of the three biological control monly forced to emigrate to neighboring ragwort plants agents. We also use an extensive 12-yr survey of 42 following consumption of all leaves and capitula (flow- ragwort populations in western Oregon to measure the er heads) (Isaacson 1973~).Although larvae will feed change in weed abundance following introduction of on vegetative ragwort plants, they prefer flowering natural enemies. We define a target density, estimate plants. Following the fifth instar (July-September in the number of sites reaching the target density, and coastal Oregon) the caterpillars pupate in litter or soil. estimate the time required to reach this density. We Although complete defoliation is common in western also look for correlations between the frequency of Oregon (Isaacson 1973a), the plants are rarely killed achieving the target density, the time required to do by larval feeding and often develop secondary flow- so, and some measures of environmental conditions. ering shoots from July through October (Cameron For the second criterion, we measure the magnitude 1935). Early assessments were that the cinnabar moth of fluctuations in weed density after reaching the target provided "partial control" of ragwort (Hawkes and density in the regional survey, and we also experimen- Johnson 1978). The moth's impact on a native Senecio tally test the ability of the system to return to low weed is discussed by Diehl and McEvoy (1989). densities following a perturbation that creates high

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us