Consumer Choice Consumer Choice • Suppose a Consumer Faces the Constraints – P1x1 + P2x2 ≤ M and X1 ≥ 0, X2 ≥ 0

Consumer Choice Consumer Choice • Suppose a Consumer Faces the Constraints – P1x1 + P2x2 ≤ M and X1 ≥ 0, X2 ≥ 0

Consumer Equilibrium • Now we have all the tools we need to analyze consumer choice Consumer Choice • Suppose a consumer faces the constraints – p1x1 + p2x2 ≤ m and x1 ≥ 0, x2 ≥ 0. • The consumer’s problem is to choose and to ECON 370: Microeconomic Theory maximize utility (i.e. to attain highest possible indifference curve) s.t. the above constraints, Summer 2004 – Rice University • That is, the consumer is choosing the most Stanley Gilbert preferred point in the budget set. Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 2 Optimal Choice Rational Constrained Choice • Provided that this is an “interior” equilibrium, x2 – That is, that it involves strictly positive amounts of all goods • And assuming all our assumptions (A1 – A4) hold: • Then we have equality of Optimal Choice – Slope of budget constraint (-p1 / p2) – Slope of indifference curve (MRS) – Ratio of marginal utilities (MU1/MU2) * * • And our budget is exhausted: p1x1 + p2x2 = m Preferences • Interpretation – Willingness to trade (-slope of IC) = p1 / p2 – Marginal utility per dollar equalized across goods Budget x1 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 3 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 4 1 Characteristics of Optimal Choice What about savings? • We said that generally all money is • Interior solution x2 spent • Slope of indifference curve = Slope of • That is p x * + p x * = m budget constraint 1 1 2 2 • How do we deal with savings? •(that is) MRS = -p / p 1 2 – By assuming our consumption choices * * • budget is exhausted: p1x1 + p2x2 = m include spending today v. spending in the future. Saving for Retirement Spending Today x1 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 5 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 6 Finding the Optimum Example • We will demonstrate two methods for finding the • Assume for this example that optimal choice – Preferences are Cobb-Douglass α 1 – α –MRS = p1 / p2 – U = x y – Maximizing the Utility function – Budget constraint is pxx + pyy ≤ m • (At least) one other that I will not cover: MU MU 1 = 2 p1 p2 – Mathematically, it is indistinguishable from the first Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 7 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 8 2 MRS Solution MRS Solution (cont) In order to calculate MRS, we first calculate Marginal Utilities We will use x* and y* to represent our solution ∂U ∂U α y* p α −1 1−α MU = = 1−α xα y−α x (from previous page) MU x = = αx y y () * = ∂x ∂y 1−α x py Solving for y*: Then we calculate MRS as: 1−α p α −1 1−α y* = x x* dy ∂u ∂x MU x αx y α y MRS = = = = α −α = α py dx ∂u ∂y MU y ()1−α x y 1−α x * * Since MRS equals the slope of the budget line, we get: Since all money is spent, we also have: pxx + pyy = m α y px * = * 1−α p * * 1−α * p x So: p x + p x x = p x + p x = x = m 1−α x py x y x x α py α α Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 9 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 10 MRS Solution (cont 2) Maximization Solution Finally: • Our problem is: α 1 – α * –max{u(x, y)} = max{x y } px x * αm If= m Then x = – Subject to the requirement that pxx + pyy ≤ m. α px • Remembering that all money will be spent, we have: * 1−α px * Substituting this into y = x (from before) – pxx + pyy= m α py • From here, the simplest way to proceed is to substitute the (1−α )m modified constraint into problem to be solved: Gives y* = – y = (m – pxx) / py py • Substituting into the original problem gives: * αm * (1−α )m α 1−α α 1−α α −1 So, our solution is: x = y = max{x y }= max{x (m − px x) py } px py Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 11 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 12 3 Maximization (cont) Maximization (cont 2) Remembering our calculus, maximizing a function requires: Since all this mess equals zero, we can eliminate common terms: 2 df (x) d f (x) α −1 α −1 1−α α −α = 0 and ≤ 0 py [αx (m − px x) − px (1−α )x (m − px x) ]= 0 dx dx2 ⎛ m − px x ⎞ α 1−α α −1 ⇒ α⎜ ⎟ − ()1−α px = 0 So max{x ()m − px x py } ⎝ x ⎠ d 1−α ⇒ xα ()m − p x pα −1 = 0 ⇒ α()m − px x − (1−α )px x = αm −αpx x − px x +αpx x = αm − px x = 0 dx x y α −1 α −1 1−α α −α αm ⇒ py [αx ()()m − px x − px 1−α x (m − px x) ]= 0 ⇒ x = Exactly as before px Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 13 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 14 Maximization (cont 3) Cobb-Douglas Observation Verifying the Second Order Condition: • Note that for Cobb-Douglas utility function – Demands are linear in income d α −1 α −1 1−α α −α p [αx ()()m − p x − p 1−α x (m − p x) ] dx y x x x – Expenditure shares are constant – Expenditure shares sum to one (reorganizing it a bit) 1−α −α α −1⎡ d ⎛ m ⎞ d ⎛ m ⎞ ⎤ = py ⎢α ⎜ − px ⎟ − px ()1−α ⎜ − px ⎟ ⎥ ⎣ dx ⎝ x ⎠ dx ⎝ x ⎠ ⎦ * αm * (1−α )m ⎡ m m −α m m −α −1⎤ x = y = α −1 ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ < 0 p p = py ⎢−α()1−α 2 ⎜ − px ⎟ − pxα()1−α 2 ⎜ − px ⎟ ⎥ x y ⎣ x ⎝ x ⎠ x ⎝ x ⎠ ⎦ Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 15 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 16 4 “Corner” Solutions Corner Example • An “interior” solution was earlier described as: – involving strictly positive amounts of all goods x2 – And all our assumptions (A1 – A4) hold Optimal Choice • If a solution does not meet these requirements, it is called a “Corner” Solution • Other methods have to be used to solve it Preferences Budget x1 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 17 Econ 370 - Consumer Choice 18 5.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us