Downloaded at Google Indexer on May 26, 2021

Downloaded at Google Indexer on May 26, 2021

Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 Proc. Nadl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 2712-2715, April 1991 Botany Protein turnover as a component in the light/dark regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase protein-serine kinase activity in C4 plants (regulatory phosphorylation/C4 photosynthesis/light activation/protein kinase/cycloheximide) JIN-AN JIAO*, CRISTINA ECHEVARRfA*t, JEAN VIDALt, AND RAYMOND CHOLLET*§ *Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, East Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583-0718; tLaboratorio de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultad de Biologfa, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida de la Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012, Sevilla, Spain; and tLaboratoire de Physiologie V6gdtale Mol6culaire, Unit6 de Recherche Associde Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 1128, Universitt de Paris-Sud, Centre d'Orsay, Bitiment 430, Orsay-Cedex, France Communicated by William L. Ogren, January 3, 1991 (receivedfor review November 13, 1990) ABSTRACT Maize leaf phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase phorylation (6, 7). However, more recent work has estab- [PEPC; orthophosphate:oxaloacetate carboxy-lyase (phospho- lished that the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase protein- rylating), EC 4.1.1.311 protein-serine kinase (PEPC-PK) phos- serine kinase (PEPC-PK) is activated by light and inactivated phorylates serine-15 of its target enzyme, thus leading to an by darkness in vivo (10). Moreover, this striking regulatory increase in catalytic activity and a concomitant decrease in process appears independent of SH status, Ca2l levels, and malate sensitivity ofthis cytoplasmic C4 photosynthesis enzyme a putative, tight-binding PEPC-PK effector (10). in the light. We have recently demonstrated that the PEPC-PK One of the distinguishing features of the reversible light activity in maize leaves is slowly, but strikingly, increased in the activation of PEPC-PK and its target enzyme, PEPC, in C4 light and decreased in darkness. In this report, we provide plants is its sluggishness in vivo; when compared to the in vivo evidence that cycloheximide, an inhibitor of cytoplasmic pro- activation of photoregulated mesophyll chloroplast stromal tein synthesis, when fed to detached leaves of C4 monocots enzymes such as pyruvate,Pi dikinase (PPDK) and NADPH- (maize, sorghum) and dicots (Portulaca oleracea) in the dark or malate dehydrogenase (MDH) (2, 6), the former are both light, completely prevents the in vivo light activation of relatively slow processes, taking up to 1 hr, rather than PEPC-PK activity regardless of whether the protein kinase minutes, for completion (10-12). To gain more insight into activity is assessed in vivo or in vitro. In contrast, chloram- this difference and the specific mechanism(s) by which the phenicol, an inhibitor of protein synthesis in chloroplasts, has PEPC-PK activity in vivo is slowly, but strikingly, increased no effect on the light activation of maize PEPC-PK. Similarly, in the light and decreased in darkness (10), detached maize treatment with cycloheximide did not influence the light acti- leaves were fed two widely used inhibitors of protein syn- vation of other photosynthesis-related enzymes in maize, in- thesis. PEPC-PK activity was subsequently assessed either cluding cytoplasmic sucrose-phosphate synthase and chloro- in vivo [malate IC50 values for inhibition ofthe target enzyme plast stromal NADPH-malate dehydrogenase and pyruvate,P; (11, 12)] or in vitro [32p phosphorylation ofpurified dark-form dikinase. These and related results, in which detached maize PEPC (7, 10)]. Whereas chloramphenicol (CAP), a 70S ribo- leaves were treated simultaneously with cycloheximide and some-specific inhibitor of chloroplastic protein synthesis, microcystin-LR, a potent in vivo and in vitro inhibitor of the had no effect on the light activation of PEPC-PK, cyclohex- PEPC type 2A protein phosphatase, indicate that short-term imide (CHX), an inhibitor of cytoplasmic protein synthesis, protein turnover of the PEPC-PK itself or some other essential completely blocked the light activation of this protein-serine component(s) (e.g., a putative protein that modifies this kinase kinase. In contrast, the in vivo activation of several other activity) is one of the primary levels in the complex and unique photoregulated cytoplasmic [sucrose-phosphate synthase regulatory cascade effecting the reversible light activa- (SPS)] and chloroplastic (PPDK, MDH) photosynthesis- tion/seryl phosphorylation of PEPC in the mesophyll cyto- related enzymes was not influenced by CHX treatment. plasm of C4 plants. These results indicate that the synthesis and degradation of PEPC-PK per se or some other essential component(s) are Light reversibly activates a number of photosynthesis- involved at one of the primary levels in the regulatory related enzymes in plants via several different mechanisms cascade effecting the reversible light activation/seryl phos- (1-4). Among these is the light activation of leaf cytoplasmic phorylation ofPEPC in the mesophyll cytoplasm ofC4 plants. phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase [PEPC; orthophos- phate:oxaloacetate carboxy-lyase (phosphorylating), EC MATERIALS AND METHODS 4.1.1.31] in C4 plants by reversible protein phosphorylation (5, 6). Previous in vitro (7, 8) and in vivo (9) studies with maize Materials. Maize (Zea mays L., cv. Golden Cross Bantam) leafPEPC demonstrated that the phosphorylation ofa single, plants were grown as described (7, 10). [y-32P]ATP [specific N-terminal seryl residue (Ser-15) leads to an increase in activity, 3000 Ci (111 TBq)/mmol] was purchased from catalytic activity and a decrease in feedback inhibition of the Amersham. Dark-form maize leaf PEPC was purified by the target enzyme by L-malate. Related findings from a recon- procedure described (7, 8). All biochemical reagents were stituted phosphorylation system indicated that the activity of obtained from Sigma except for microcystin-LR (MC) (Cal- the protein-serine kinase that catalyzes this regulatory phos- phorylation of PEPC is not affected by a number of putative, Abbreviations: PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; PEPC- light-modulated cytoplasmic effectors (e.g., reduced thiore- PK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase protein-serine kinase; SPS, doxin h, Ca2+, PPj, fructose 2,6-bisphosphate) and autophos- sucrose-phosphate synthase; PPDK, pyruvate,P1 dikinase; MDH, NADPH-malate dehydrogenase; CHX, cycloheximide; CAP, chlor- amphenicol; MC, microcystin-LR. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge §To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: University of payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Biochemistry, 210 BcH, East in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583-0718. 2712 Botany: Jiao et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 2713 biochem). Stock solutions of 10 mM CHX and 310 mM CAP RESULTS AND DISCUSSION were prepared in absolute ethanol, while 0.5 mM MC was Effects of CHX, CAP, and MC on the Light-Induced dissolved in 20% (vol/vol) methanol. of Maize Leaf PEPC. The IC50 Feeding of Protein Synthesis and Protein Phosphatase In- Changes in Malate Sensitivity values for PEPC inhibition by L-malate were used as an hibitors. Preilluminated leaves (-2 g fresh wt each) from 4- indirect means of following the effect of dark to light transi- to 6-week-old maize plants were excised underwater, in- tions on the apparent in vivo activity of the PEPC-PK since serted into 150-ml beakers containing 100 ml ofdistilled water these values reflect the seryl-phosphorylation status of the or water (control), 5 ILM CHX, 310 ,uM CAP, 10 nM MC in target enzyme both in vitro (7, 8) and in vivo in response to and maintained at room temperature. When feeding was done light and dark (9-12). Feeding 5 ,uM CHX to detached in the dark, the beakers were placed in a darkened fume hood preilluminated maize leaves in the dark overnight completely overnight. The dark sample was then prepared from these and reproducibly prevented the subsequent light-induced leaves and the corresponding light sample was collected after increase in the malate IC50 value ofPEPC without having any a 90-min illumination ofthe tissue. When feeding was done in significant effect on the dark-form enzyme (Table 1). In the light, detached control leaves that had been preillumi- contrast, CAP treatment had no effect on the light-induced nated for 1.5 hr in water were either maintained in water or changes in malate sensitivity of PEPC (Table 1). Overnight 4 hr in continued light, followed by prep- fed inhibitors for feeding of 5 AM CHX in the dark to predarkened maize leaves aration of leaf extracts. Illumination was provided by a had the same inhibitory effect on light activation of PEPC. forced-air cooled 300-W, low-temperature lamp at an incident Results similar to those presented in Table 1 were obtained light intensity of 600-800 /iE m 2 s-' (E, einstein) (400-700 when detached leaves of sorghum, another C4 grass, and nm). halved leaves of Portulaca oleracea, a C4 dicot, were fed Preparation of Leaf Extracts. Samples (0.3 g fresh wt) from CHX (data not shown). the control or inhibitor-treated leaf material were chopped Given that such inhibitors are known not to be absolutely and ground at 40C in a prechilled mortar containing washed specific, thus possibly causing detrimental side effects (18), sand, 2% (wt/vol) insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 1.5 ml and that the 3-(3 ,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea- of the appropriate extraction buffer. Buffer A [0.1 M sensitive light activation/phosphorylation of PEPC occurs in Tris HC1, pH 8.0/20% (vol/vol) glycerol/10 mM MgCl2/14 the cytoplasm and is somehow related to photosynthetic mM 2-mercaptoethanol/1 mM EDTA] was used for prepa- electron transport and/or photophosphorylation (5, 6, 19), it ration of PEPC and its protein-serine kinase; buffer B (buffer was imperative to examine the effect of CHX treatment on A plus 2 mM pyruvate) was used for PPDK; buffer C (50 mM the in vivo light activation of other photosynthesis-related Mops-NaOH, pH 7.5/15 mM MgCl2/2.5 mM dithiothreitol/1 enzymes in maize.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us