ÌX1AAR<A\$_B Advaitasiddhisarasamgraha compiled by V. Swaminathan under the guidance of Dr. R. Krishnamurthi Sastrigal, M.A., Ph..D., Principal, Sanskrit College, Mylapore, Chennai 600004. "Sankara Nilayam", 2, Sankaranarayana Street, Tambaram Sanatorium East, Chennai, 600047. Published on the eve of 2509th Jayanthi celebrations of ADI SANKARA BHAGAVATPADA on 28th April, 2001 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 10 Stotras of Madhusudana Saraswati....................................................................................... 12 6S<'( W3............................................................................................................................. 13 Paricheda I ....................................................................................................................... 13 >6 >6_ _16 16 H H> > R R·;A;>' ·;A;>' R< R<Rm Rm1> 1> 5 5 Á60 Á60: :Q ................................Q .................................................................... 15 1. Proof for discussion the sentence with diversity of opinions......................................... 15 6 6 D D1 1 R>' R>'( ( W3">' W3">' R< R<......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Discussion of the delimiting adjunct of subject. ............................................................. 15 6 6_ _6b 6b :2; :2; R1 R1> > 5Á6 5Á60 0 : : Q Q 6 6_ _2: 2:\ \ .............................................................................................................. 16 3. Proof Of Non-Reality Of World...................................................................................... 16 (Non-Reality Is Different From Being And Unbeing).......................................................... 16 1 1T; T; :2; :2; R1 R1> >=D =D0 0 : :Q Q...................................................................................................................... 16 4. Second Definition of Non-reality....................................................................................... 17 1 1 Y Y1 1 T; T; : : 2; 2;R R1>= 1>=D D0 0 :Q :Q......................................................................................................................... 17 5. Third Definition Of Non-Reality....................................................................................... 17 ' '1 1 U U2 2] ] : :2; 2;R R1>= 1>=D D0 0 : : Q ................................Q .......................................................................................... 17 6. Fourth Definition Of Non-Reality................................................................................... 17 6 6 +': +': :2; :2; R1 R1> >=D =D0 0 : :Q Q........................................................................................................................ 18 7. Fifth Definition Of Non-Reality ...................................................................................... 18 : :2; 2; R1 R1> > :2; :2; R1 R1> > : :Q Q............................................................................................................................. 18 8. Non-Reality Of The Non-Reality ...................................................................................... 18 ?; ?; 1> 1> B BW W1 1V V66H 66H.............................................................................................................................. 18 9.Compatibility of Cognisability as cause .............................................................................. 19 ) ). 1> 1> B BW W1 1V V66H 66H............................................................................................................................ 19 10.Compatibility of Insentience as cause............................................................................... 19 6 6 S S< <t'( t'( ¿1>B ¿1>BW W1 1V V66H 66H....................................................................................................................... 19 11.Compatibility of Limitedness as cause ............................................................................ 19 Ì\ Ì\?1 ?1> >B BW W1 1V V66H 66H............................................................................................................................ 20 12. Compatibility Of Being An Effect as cause.................................................................. 20 A A R RW W6 6R R4"1 4"1> > 5 5 < <RA RA........................................................................................................................ 20 13. Refutation Of Adventious Condition............................................................................. 20 ÌR9 ÌR9 RAA RAAR R:; :; 9m 9m........................................................................................................................... 21 14. Refutation Of Similarity With Pseudo Inferences..................................................... 21 3 6 6 _ _1;D 1;D 8 8 R4 R4 R RW WR< R<.............................................................................................................................. 21 15. Refutation Of "Contradiction By Perception"............................................................. 21 6 6 _ _1;D 1;D6 6 _ _R R8 8º;9 º;9 m m.......................................................................................................................... 22 16. Refutation Of "Superior Validity Of Perception" ..................................................... 22 6 6 _ _1;DA; 1;DA;Ì Ì5 5U U: :R R5 5 8 8R4 R4; ;1> 1> : : Q ................................Q ................................................................................ 23 17. Sublatability Of Perception By Inference .................................................................... 23 6 6 _ _1;DA; 1;DA;Ì ÌR$ R$ : : 8 8 R4> R4> 1> 1> : :Q QQ ................................Q .................................................................................. 23 18. Sublatability Of Perception By Sruti............................................................................ 23 Ì6'( Ì6'( W W35; 35; R; R; > > X X@:; @:; 9 9m m.............................................................................................................. 24 19. Disproof Of The Inequality Of Apaccheda Nyaya .................................................... 24 > > S S5B? 5B?X X1; 1; Ì Ì5 5U U: : 1 1 A A R:; R:; 9 9m m........................................................................................................... 24 20. Refutation Of The Equality Of The Inference "Fire Is Cold".................................... 24 6 6 _ _1;DA; 1;DA; =mR =mR} }8 8R R4;1 4;1> > W W8 8R R4": 4": Q ................................Q ........................................................................... 25 21. Refutation Of " Perception Cannot Be Sublated By Inference" ................................ 25 9 9 R> R>8 8R R4 4R RW W66 66 H H.......................................................................................................................... 25 22. Compatibility Of Future Sublation .............................................................................. 25 A A 1;1 1;1> > Ì Ì5 5U U: :R R59m 59m...................................................................................................................... 25 23. Refutation Of Inference Of Absolute Reality Of The Empirical World ...................... 26 : :2; 2;R R1> 1>W W? ?W W@ @ Ì Ì5 5U U: :R R5 5 :Q :Q................................................................................................................... 26 24. Special Syllogisms On Non-Reality................................................................................ 27 Ì Ì2 2 Ì ÌR R$ $ : :8 8R R4 4Í Í R< R<................................................................................................................... 27 25. Justification Of Sublation By Srutis.............................................................................. 28 ÌA ÌA1 1A A R4"1 R4"1> > : :Q Q............................................................................................................................ 28 26. Non-Real is Capable of Proof........................................................................................... 29 ÌA ÌA 1 1 AR AR4 4"1> "1> Ì9 Ì9 R> R>W W8 8 R4" R4": :Q ................................Q ............................................................................ 29 27. Sublation of "Non-real cannot prove" ........................................................................... 29 $? $?; ;A A\ \8 8 54 54 9 9m m.......................................................................................................................... 30 28. Refutation Of The Cogniser-Cognised Relation.............................................................. 30 Ì Ì5 5 U U"V=1" "V=1"] ] 5Á6 5Á60 0 : :Q Q..................................................................................................................... 30 29. Proof Of Favourable Logic............................................................................................... 30 6 6_ _ 1 1": ":] ]>;>A >;>A2 2R R........................................................................................................................... 30 30. Pratikarma-vyavastha ....................................................................................................... 31 6 6_ _ 1