Detailed Site Assessment (DSA) February 2020 Afgooye district, Lower Shabelle region, Somalia SOMALIA CONTEXT METHODOLOGY Somalia continues to experience recurrent Primary data collection employed a Key To provide a local, context-specific overview and droughts, floods, and armed conflict, driving Informant (KI) methodology with KI interviews allow more targeted responses, this factsheet large-scale displacement. The high levels conducted by REACH enumerators in locations presents a summary of findings of assessed of displacement have resulted in fluctuating directly accessible by REACH Field Officers settlements in Afgooye district only. population estimates of Internally Displaced (FOs) and by CCCM partner organizations. Persons (IDPs) in both formal and informal Targeted urban areas within districts were The nation-wide, sectoral factsheets are available settlements, thereby complicating the provision determined based on a secondary literature here. of basic services to address their needs. review of previous assessments conducted on Assessment information IDP populations1. Following the identification The Detailed Site Assessment (DSA) was of target urban areas, REACH located IDP Total assessed sites initiated in coordination with the Camp settlements through contacting the lowest level 44 Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) of governance2 in each area to identify the Displacement Cluster in order to provide the humanitarian locations of IDP settlements. community with up-to-date information on Total number of IDPs households the location of IDP sites, the conditions and The severity calculation for the third round of the arriving into a new settlement: 949 capacity of the sites, and an estimate of the DSA was developed in close consultation with severity of humanitarian needs of residents. clusters and partner organisations and updated Total number of IDPs households Data collection for the current round of the DSA to improve the quality and reliability of data departing from an old settlement: 541 took place from November 2019 to February collected regarding IDP settlement locations, 2020 and assessed 2,344 IDP settlements in estimated size of resident populations, and the The Bakool was the main reported 61 districts across Somalia. severity of humanitarian needs. The severity region of origin for IDPs in the score goes from 1-4, with 1 being the least Awdal district. The proportion of 32% This factsheet presents the findings at district severe and 4 being the most severe. The IDPs reportedly coming from this level for the 44 assessed IDP settlements in categories are none/minimal, stress, severe district was: Afgooye district, Lower Shabelle, Somalia. and extreme. ASSESSMENT COVERAGE MAP Summary of severity score* Overall cluster severity score and severity phase classification at district level: ETHIOPIA Clusters Severity Severity camp 2 camp 1 Score phase dolaawe deris camp hulbo SOMALIA raqayle aaytira Food security / Livelihoods 3 Severe baalguri jaanle Afgooye Mogadishu Nutrition 3 Severe banaane Afgooye carta musbax hawo tako 3 baqdaad Health 3 Severe barafle laanta 1 kuusow al fardowsa Protection 3 Severe Shelter and Non-food items 4 Extreme Education 4 Extreme IDP Sites Town Water, Sanitation/ Hygiene 3 Severe Roads daryeel city dugsiilow Primary rooble busley For the list of indicators and the severity score alfaraj Secondary gadisoow neebsow al shareeco calculations, see the annex on this factsheet. Other Boundary *The analysis methodology was adjusted between District* Region 2019 and 2020 in order to align with other multi-sectoral assessments carried out by REACH and other partners. This included adapting the ranking system. Therefore, Kahda the results for 2020 cannot be compared directly with the * the geographical location of some sites may previous years, but can be useful to show the differences not match the boundaries (source: OCHA) of between the sectors and districts. km the district they were reported in 0 2 4 1Previous REACH DSA, JMCNA and CCCM Partner Organization Population Estimates 2District Office, Mayor’s Office, etc. For more information on this factsheet please contact: PB 1 CCCM CLUSTER CCCM Cluster: [email protected]/ [email protected] SUPPORTING DISPLACED CCCOMMUNITIESCM CLUSTER SUPPORTINGwww.cccmcluster.or DISPLAg CED COMMUNITIES REACH: [email protected] www.cccmcluster.org Afgooye district, Lower Shabelle region, Somalia DSA | 2020 Afgooye FOOD SECURITY & LIVELIHOODS (FSL) NUTRITION % of sites per FSL severity score: % of sites per nutrition severity score: No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme 28% 50% 22% 0% 9% 78% 13% 0% Proportion of sites with no access to 13% Proportion of sites with no access to food markets, as reported by KIs: 5% 13+87H nutrition services, as reported by KIs: 5+95H Average time taken to travel to nearest food market, as reported by KIs3: 29 minutes Average time taken to travel to nearest nutrition service, as reported by KIs5: 28 minutes Three most common reported primary sources of food4: 100++ Proportion of sites reporting nutrition items distributed in Market purchases 100% the past 3 months: NA NA 95+30+0+1 Therapeutic and suppl. food 95% NA NA MUAC tape 30% Proportion of sites in which the majority of residents Therapeutic milk products6 0% 4 reportedly conduct the following livelihood sources : Super Cereal Plus 1% 63+0+0 Daily wage labour 63% Pastoralism 0% Proportion of sites where the population 75% Agriculture 0% was reportedly not able to receive nutrition support: 75+25H Proportion of sites where the population was reportedly not able to receive food 94% assistance: 94+6H HEALTH EDUCATION % of sites per health severity score: % of sites per education severity score: No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme 0% 43% 57% 0% 0% 43% 54% 3% Proportion of sites reportedly having no Proportion of sites with no access to 0% healthcare facilities, as reported by KIs: 55% +95H access to learning facilities: 0+100+H Average time taken to travel to nearest Average time to travel to nearest health learning facilities, as reported by KIs:8 24 minutes facility, as reported by KIs:7 37 minutes Reported type of learning facilities available at sites: 85+88+100+0 Proportion of sites where KIs reported Primary 85% women are not able to access skilled 45% personnel while giving birth: 45+55H Secondary 88% Quoranic 100% Proportion of sites where the population was reportedly not able to receive 51% Basic Literacy/ Numeracy Classes 0% healthcare support: 51+49H Average proportion of learning facilities Three most common reported types of health facilities at sites reportedly having no gender 79% available at sites4: segregated latrines: 90+65+53 79+21H Pharmacy 90% Average proportion of learning facilities District hospital 65% at sites reportedly having no fences and 81% Private clinic 53% clear demarcation: 81+19H 3The findings related to a subset of sites where KIs reported having access to food markets. 6F75 or F100. 4Respondents could select multiple options. Applies to all questions with reference ‘4’. 7The findings related to a subset of sites where KIs reported having access to health facilities. 5The findings related to a subset of sites where KIs reported having access to nutrition services. 8The findings related to a subset of sites where KIs reported having access to education facilities. For more information on this factsheet please contact: 2 CCCM CLUSTER CCCM Cluster: [email protected]/ [email protected] SUPPORTING DISPLACED COMMUNITIES www.cccmcluster.org REACH: [email protected] Afgooye district, Lower Shabelle region, Somalia DSA | 2020 Afgooye PROTECTION SHELTER & NON-FOOD ITEMS (NFIs) % of sites per protection severity score: % of sites per shelter & NFIs severity score: No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 8% 83% 9% Proportion of sites reportedly having no Proportion of sites reportedly having no 100% child friendly spaces: 100+0H access to markets selling NFIs: 3535% +65H Proportion of sites reportedly having no Three most common reported types of NFIs available 100% at markets4: women spaces: 80+74+72 100+0H Plastic sheets 80% Proportion of sites where restrictions on Jerry cans or buckets 74% 5% movement was reported: 5+95H Blankets 72% Three most common reported types of safety and security Proportion of sites where KIs reported incidents in the 3 months prior to data collection4: shelters damaged by fires or floods in 48% Armed violence 21% the 3 months prior to data collection: 48+52H Denied access to justice 4% Proportion of sites where KIs reported Gender based violence 4% cases of evictions in the 3 months prior 0% to data collection: 0+100+H Three most common reported locations of safety and security incidents in the 3 months prior to data collection4: 26+4+1 Proportion of sites where the population In shelters 26% was reportedly not able to receive shelter 90% and NFI support: When leaving settlement/town 4% 90+10H On the way or at water sources 1% WATER, SANITATION & HYGIENE (WASH) % of sites per WASH severity score: Sanitation: No or minimal Stress Severe Extreme Proportion of sites where KIs reported 1% no access to functioning latrines: 0% 0% 100% 0% 1+99H Water: Proportion of sites where KIs reported 62% Proportion of sites reportedly having no open defecation: 0% 62+38H access to functioning water sources: Proportion of sites with toilets in which KIs reported having:10 0+100+H 15+14+13 Average time taken to travel to nearest Handwashing facilities 15% water source, as reported by KIs:9 32 minutes Locks on the inside 14% Three most common reported primary source of water: Internal lighting 13% Vendors or shop 74% Hygiene: Water kiosk (humanitarian aid) 13% Proportion of sites reportedly having no Piped system 10% access to bathing facilities: 100% The reported types of water treatments were chlorine tablets/ 100+0H aquatabs (100%), boiling (0%), cloth filter (5%) and other Average time taken to travel to nearest kind of filter (membrane, ceramic, or commercial filter) bathing facility, as reported by KIs:11 NA (0%).