(ARISTOLOCHIA MANSHURIENSIS)* O.V. Nakonechnaya, S.V. Nesterova PRIMITIVE FEATURES AND ADAPTATIONS OF RELICT LIANA (ARISTOLOCHIA MANSHURIENSIS) The relict liana morphological peculiarities are studied. The sort has the primitive features that have remained from ancestor thermophilic forms. The adaptation characterizes fitness to more severe living conditions. Key words: relict liana, ontogenesis, primitive features, adaptations. Aristolochiaceae Juss. – Magnoliales [2–4]. paleoherbs Lactoridaceae Aristolochiaceae – Aristolochia manshuriensis Kom.) - A. manshuriensis [11– – A. manshuriensis A. manshuriensis - - A. manshuriensis – * -I- -06); Aristolochia contorta". 40 13 1 Aristolochia manshuriensis: h1 – h2 – h3 – h4 – h5 – h6 – h7 – A. manshuriensis 1. - - - ,3±0, – –0,5 A. manshuriensis 2. Aristolochia manshuriensis p j im v 1,5–2,0 c – – – 1,8±0,03 0,27–0,30 – – – 0,29±0,002 0,03–0,035 0,05–0,08 0,11–0,25 1,1–3,3 0,033±0,0004 0,07±0,002 0,18±0,01 2,12±0,12 2,5–2,7 4,2–6,5 8,4–12,0 18–20 2,6±0,02 5,6±0,14 10,2±0,21 19,0±0,12 1,7–1,8 3,5–6,5 7,5–10,5 15–19 1,7±0,01 5,2±0,18 9,1±0,16 17,5±0,20 2,6–2,9 2,5–5,3 5,1–8,2 10–12 2,8±0,02 4,0±0,14 6,8±0,16 11,2±0,13 2,0–4,0 7,4–9,2 15,3–20,0 3,2±0,12 8,5±0,10 18,0±0,24 – j – im – v – – 41 3. – 4. – A. manshuriensis 5. (10– ) – – III. 6. – – – – – – Aristolochia manshuriensis 1,0–2,1 1,9–2,9 2,5–3,5 1,7±0,07 2,2±0,05 3,0±0,06 0,9–2,0 1,8–2,9 2,9–3,4 1,4±0,05 2,1±0,06 3,1±0,03 – U- - - – – – A. manshuriensis – - – - – – 8. 42 13 1 Aristolochia manshuriensis – – – – c – – – 6 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 1 ** 0 Aristolochia manshuriensis: * p<0,05; ** p A. manshuriensis A. macrophylla 0 [17, 18]. A. macrophylla – - 43 A. manshuriensis A. macrophylla [32]. , , – . A. mans- huriensis A. macrophylla Aristolochia [34– – A. manshuriensis Aristolochia A. manshuriensis – Aristolochia A. manshuriensis - - - A. manshuriensis – A. manshuriensis – Schisandra chinensis, Actinidia kolomikta Pueraria lobata A. manshuriensis, A. manshuriensis Vitis amurensis – Actinidia kolomikta Pueraria lobata 44 13 1 –3- – A. manshuriensis Actinidia kolomik- ta Schisandra chinensis – manshuriensis – manshuriensis A. manshuriensis, manshuriensis manshuriensis manshuriensis 1. – - - . – 2. Wettstein R. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. – Leipzig: Wien, 1935. – 321 p. 3. Cronquist A. An integiated system of classification of flowering plants. – New York: Columbia University Press, 1981. – 1262 . 4. Takhtajan A.L. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. – Columbia: University Press, 1996. – 643 p. 5. Loconte H., Stevenson D.W. Cladistics of the Magnoliidae // Cladistics. – 1991. – V. 7. – P. 267–296. 6. A combined cladistic analysis of the angiosperms using rbcL and non- molecular data sets // Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. – 1998. – Vol. 85. – P. 137–212. 7. – – 8. Aristolochia // . – – – –21. 9. – 2008. – 10. – “ ”, 2008. – –68. 11. – – – 12. Aristolochia manshuriensis Kom. // – – –52. 13. – – 14. – – –112. 45 15. – – –55. 16. – – 17. Adams C.A., Baskin J.M., Baskin . Comparative morphology of seeds of four closely related species of Aris- tolochia subgenus Siphisia (Aristolochiaceae, Piperales) // Bot. J. Linn. Soc. – 2005 . – V. 148. – P. 433–436. 18. Adams C.A., Baskin J.M., Baskin C.C. Trait stasis versus adaptation in disjunct relict species: evolutionary changes in seed dormancy–breaking and germination requirements in a subclade of Aristolochia subgenus Siphisia (Piperales) // Seed Sci. Res. – 2005b. – V. 15. – P. 161–173. 19. Aristolochia manshuriensis (Aristolochiaceae) / . [ .] // . – 2006. – . 62. – . 3. – . 37–41. 20. – 2008. – – –542. 21. Aristolochia manshuriensis (Aristolochiaceae – 2009. – . – – –780. 22. – 1950. – – –204. 23. – – 215 c. 24. – - – 25. – - – 26. Molecular phylogeny of Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae) inferred from matK sequences / J. Murata [et al.] // Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. – 2001. – V. 52. – P. 75–83. 27. Wen J. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants // Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. – 1999. – V. 30. – P. 421–455. 28. Timing the eastern Asian–eastern North American floristic disjunction: Molecular clock corroborates paleonto- logical evidence / Q.-Y. Xiang [et al.] // Mol. Phylogent. Evol. – 2000. – V. 15. – P. 462–472. 29. – – 30. Wen J., Zimmer E.A. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng Genus, Araliaceae): Inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. – 1996. – V. 6. – P. 167–177. 31. Kim Y.-D., Jansen R.K. Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogeny of the Berberidaceae // Amer. J. Bot. – 1998. – V. 85. – P. 1766–1778. 32. IX – – 33. – 1936. – . 1. – . 3. – . 7–66. 34. Pfeifer H.W. Revision of the North and Central American hexandrous species of Aristolochia (Aristolochia- ceae) // Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. – 1966. – V. 53. – P. 116–196. 35. Flowering plants of the world. – Oxford: Oxford university press, 1971. – 336 p. 36. Huang S., Lawrence M.K., Gilbert M.G. Aristolochiaceae Jussieu // Flora of China. – St. Louis, Missouri Bo- tanical Garden Press, 2003. – V. 5. – P. 258–269. 37. – - CCCP, 1960. – 38. Aristolochia contorta – 2010. – – –41. 39. – - - CCCP, 1955. – –194. 40. Schizandra chinensis (Schisandraceae) Acti- nidia kolomikta (Actinidiaceae – 1994. – – – –52. 46 13 1 41. Wolfe J.A. Paleogene flora from the Gulf of Alaska region // US Geological Survey Professional Paper. – 1977. – V. 997. – P. 1–107. 42. – - – –44. – – Yu.I. Kolotova THE ANALYSIS OF BUCKWHEAT PRODUCTIVITY DEPENDENCE ON THE FACTOR INDICATORS ON THE MULTIPLE REGRESSION BASIS The influence of the water and nutritional mode on buckwheat crop capacity is investigated. It is established that productivity structural indicators interaction is different. The regression analysis showed that the greatest influence on the buckwheat productivity indicator is exerted by density standing, the second im- portant factor is the plant survival rate on a square meter, and the third important factor is the mass of 1000 grains. Key words: buckwheat, plants safety, crop capacity, irrigation, correlation factors. – – – - - - , 2010– – N30P60; N40P80K20 N50P100K30 47.