30.9.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 328/53 Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and M. Sammut, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti and J. Bauerschmidt, acting as Agents) Re: Action pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for material loss alleged to have been suffered as a result of the Commis- sion’s refusal to allow the Italian state to establish a state aid in favour of the Banca delle Marche. Operative part of the order 1. The action is dismissed. 2. Mario Scaloni and Ennio Figini shall bear their own costs and the costs incurred by the Commission. 3. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs. (1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018. Case T-544/18: Order of the General Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2019 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission (Case T-544/18) (1) (Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Notification of a change in the national allocation table for Germany for the period from 2013 to 2020 — Request to change the national allocation table recorded in the European Union Transaction Log — Action for failure to act — Instruction given during the proceedings by the Commission to the central administration — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) (2019/C 328/60) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and D. Jacob, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Becker, acting as Agents.) Re: Application, principally, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to instruct the cen- tral administrator to record in the national allocation table in the European Union Transaction Log (EUTL) the change notified on 8 February 2018 by the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of the applicant’s installation and, in the alternative, an application pur- suant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the alleged decision adopted by the Commission on 31 August 2018 following the applicant’s letter of formal notice of 14 May 2018. Operative part of the order 1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. 2. The claim seeking to ‘reprimand’ the Commission representatives for having produced inaccurate material before the General Court and for having failed to comply with their procedural obligation to present a factually accurate statement is rejected. C 328/54 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.9.2019 3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application by the Federal Republic of Germany for permission to intervene. 4. The Commission shall bear its own costs and those incurred by ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH. 5. The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. (1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018. Case T-660/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — VodafoneZiggo Group v Commission (Case T-660/18) (1) (Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility) (2019/C 328/61) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: VodafoneZiggo Group BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: W. Knibbeler and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents) Re: Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter of 30 August 2018 sent by the Commission to the Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Consumers and Markets Authority, Netherlands), the Dutch regulatory authority, containing its comments made pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33), on a draft measure made accessible by that authority (Cases NL/2018/2099 and NL/2018/2100). Operative part of the order 1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible. 2. There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of the Netherlands or by T-Mobile Neth- erlands Holding BV, T-Mobile Netherlands BV, T-Mobile Thuis BV and Tele2 Nederland BV. 3. VodafoneZiggo Group BV shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene. 4. VodafoneZiggo Group, the Commission, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, T-Mobile Netherlands Holding, T-Mobile Netherlands, T- Mobile Thuis and Tele2 Nederland shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene. (1) OJ C 4, 7.1.2019..