Late Quaternary Environmental Change in the Bonneville Basin, Western USA

Late Quaternary Environmental Change in the Bonneville Basin, Western USA

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167 (2001) 243±271 www.elsevier.nl/locate/palaeo Late Quaternary environmental change in the Bonneville basin, western USA D.B. Madsena,*, D. Rhodeb, D.K. Graysonc, J.M. Broughtond, S.D. Livingstonb, J. Hunta, J. Quadee, D.N. Schmitta, M.W. Shaver IIIa aUtah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, USA bDesert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USA cUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA dUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, USA eUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 9 December 1999; received in revised form 24 July 2000; accepted for publication 7 September 2000 Abstract Excavation and analyses of small animal remains from strati®ed raptor deposits spanning the last 11.5 ka, together with collection and analysis of over 60 dated fossil woodrat midden samples spanning the last 50 ka, provide a detailed record of changing climate in the eastern Great Basin during the late Pleistocene and Holocene. Sagebrush steppe dominated the northern Bonneville basin during the Full Glacial, suggesting that conditions were cold and relatively dry, in contrast to the southern basin, which was also cold but moister. Limber pine woodlands dominated ,13±11.5 ka, indicating increased dryness and summer temperatures ,6±78C cooler than present. This drying trend accelerated after ,11.5 ka causing Lake Bonneville to drop rapidly, eliminating 11 species of ®sh from the lake. From ,11.5±8.2 ka xerophytic sagebrush and shadscale scrub replaced more mesophilic shrubs in a step-wise fashion. A variety of small mammals and plants indicate the early Holocene was ,38C cooler and moister than at present, not warmer as suggested by a number of climatic models. The diversity of plants and animals changed dramatically after 8.2 ka as many species disappeared from the record. Some of the upland species returned after ,4 ka and Great Salt Lake became fresh enough at ,3.4 and ,1.2 ka to support populations of Utah chub. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Quaternary; Great Basin; Lake Bonneville ®sh; Paleoclimates; Vegetation change; Faunal change 1. Introduction vironmental change in and around the basin has increased dramatically. Extant data are strongly The Bonneville basin is the biggest drainage basin biased towards geomorphological analyses of lake- in the Great Basin of western North America, and, at level changes (e.g. Currey, 1990; Oviatt et al., times, contains one of the largest lakes on the conti- 1992), yet provide a foundation for our understand- nent (Fig. 1). Over the past several decades the ing of the evolution of biotic communities in the amount of information on late Quaternary paleoen- region. We have attempted to construct a more comprehensive picture by developing a long-term * Corresponding author. Fax: 11-801-537-3500. interdisciplinary research project focused on placing E-mail address: [email protected] (D.B. Madsen). changes in Bonneville basin ¯ora and fauna in a 0031-0182/01/$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0031-0182(00)00240-6 244 D.B. Madsen et al. / Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167 (2001) 243±271 Fig. 1. Locations of the Great Basin, Bonneville basin, and Great Salt Lake in the southwestern USA (after Sack, 1989; Currey, 1990). geomorphological context. Here we brie¯y report ally rising lake cycles peaking at the Bonneville level major aspects of this project. about 15.3±15.0 ka.1 This general trend was inter- rupted by a climatically controlled stillstand which 1.1. Lake-level history formed the Stansbury shoreline complex, and a ,45 m lake-level regression dated to sometime There have been closed-basin lakes in the Bonne- between 22 and 20 ka (Oviatt et al., 1990, 1992). ville basin for at least the last two million years The continued rise of Lake Bonneville over the (Machette et al., 1992; Morrison, 1991), but exposed course of the next 6 ka was probably interrupted by shoreline features are primarily associated with the a number of minor climatically induced oscillations, last major lake cycle. The transgressive phase of the but these are poorly represented in the shoreline Lake Bonneville cycle probably began sometime features (see Oviatt, 1997). between about 32 ka (Currey, 1990) and 30 ka (Oviatt et al., 1992), and consisted of a long 1 All dates within the radiocarbon time scale are given in radio- 10,000±15,000 year period of oscillating, but gener- carbon years (ka) unless otherwise noted. D.B. Madsen et al. / Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167 (2001) 243±271 245 Fig. 2. Letters show midden localities reported here (TT is the Top of the Terrace locality). Numbers show the location of other paleoenviron- mental records discussed in the text: 1, Grays Lake; 2, Swan Lake/Zenda Threshold; 3, Bear River; 4, Raft River Mountains; 5, Crescent Spring/ Hogup Cave; 6, Great Salt Lake; 7, Danger Cave; 8, Potato Canyon Bog; 9, Ruby Marsh/Lake Franklin; 10, Little Cottonwood Canyon/ Snowbird Bog; 11, Old River Bed; 12, Council Hall Cave/Northern Snake Range; 13, Southern Snake Range; 14, Confusion Range; 15, Huntington Canyon. By about 15.0 ka, the lake reached the Zenda regressive phase is poorly known, but extant data threshold in southern Idaho and began to over¯ow suggest that the lake may have reached modern levels into the Snake/Columbia River drainage (Oviatt et or lower by sometime after 12 ka before rebounding al., 1992). Catastrophic downcutting at Red Rock to reach the Gilbert level sometime between 11 and Pass about 14.5 ka reduced the level of the lake 10 ka (Currey, 1990; Oviatt et al., 1992; but see Zach- 108 m in less than a year (Currey and Oviatt, 1985; ary and Oviatt, 1999). Jarrett and Malde, 1987). This threshold-controlled Provo level lake elevation was maintained until after 1.2. Plant communities about 14.0 ka when the lake began to enter a regres- sive phase that continued with some interruption for Our understanding of late Quaternary changes in the next 6 ka (Currey, 1990; Oviatt et al., 1992). This the structure of Bonneville basin plant communities 246 D.B. Madsen et al. / Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167 (2001) 243±271 GREATSALTLAKE Lakeside Butte Twin 1400 Hills 1300 Alkali Flat Ridge Valley Little Homestead Eardley Th Cave 1500 reshold ath ath Valley De De La 1400 Homestead Knoll 1500 keside lley 1600 Va l Seda 1500 m a x . h om e (fo 1400 ra 1400 gi ng) range Deardens Knoll 1500 Mountains 1300 Mountain 1600 1500 1400 Sally 1300 1400 contour interval 100 meters 0 3 N UTAH km Fig. 3. Map of the north end of the Lakeside Mountains showing the location of Homestead Cave along the margin of Great Salt Lake and the maximum foraging area of raptors operating from the cave. D.B. Madsen et al. / Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167 (2001) 243±271 247 is based largely on the identi®cation and dating of ciated with lower elevation plant communities in the plant macrofossils from fossil woodrat (Neotoma central Bonneville basin is derived primarily from spp.) middens, but is supplemented by pollen records the sampling of strati®ed raptor deposits in a cave from a number of locations in and around the basin. on the western margin of Great Salt Lake (Fig. 3), We collected and dated 62 samples from middens together with extant collections from a number of collected at 40 localities in and adjacent to the Great other strati®ed caves around the Bonneville basin Salt Lake basin, the northernmost major sub-basin of (e.g. Grayson, 1988). Homestead Cave was selected the Bonneville basin (Fig. 2).2 Many of these middens after an extensive reconnaissance and testing of sites date to a period of 14±10 ka spanning the Pleistocene/ in the western Bonneville basin. The goal was to iden- Holocene transition, but a number are 30,000±40,000 tify a cave with strati®ed deposits that could be years old or older and 37 samples are of Holocene age. cleanly separated and that contained extensive deposi- The older middens remain under analysis and we tion by owls, but with little contamination by human provide only an initial assessment here. The number foragers. Many species of owls feed on a variety of of younger middens, in conjunction with plant small mammals, reptiles, birds, ®sh and insects (e.g. remains from strati®ed caves around the margin of Marti, 1986; Andrews, 1990; Marti and Kochert, the Great Salt Lake Desert and from previously recov- 1996). They thus can produce a useful sample of ered middens, is now suf®cient to estimate the nature small-animal communities within their foraging of changing plant communities in the Bonneville radius. Owls typically roost on interior ledges where basin during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition and regurgitated pellets form cones on the cave ¯oor later. containing tens of thousands of bones (Andrews, The middens contain vegetation which grew within 1990; Kusmer, 1990). Perches in Homestead Cave 50±100 m of their location (Dial and Czaplewski, are currently active and consolidated cones comprised 1990; Frase and Sera, 1993), and were found in of droppings, pellet matter and bone are situated on caves, overhangs, and crevices, principally in lime- the modern surface below several different roosts. The stone bedrock outcrops. Midden preservation depends foraging radius of owls is typically less than 5 km on long-term protection from moisture; rock outcrops from their roosts (e.g. Craighead and Craighead, with abundant fractures, or with exfoliating surfaces, 1969; Smith, 1971). While this foraging radius may tend not to contain very old middens.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us