Pontederia Sagittata, Desde El Comienzo De La Apertura Floral Hasta La Formación De La Infrutescencia 8 4

Pontederia Sagittata, Desde El Comienzo De La Apertura Floral Hasta La Formación De La Infrutescencia 8 4

Canal Gallegos, a lo largo del cual se distribuye P. sagittata en la zona de estudio Aspectos de la población de P. sagittata durante la inundación del pastizal en Cansaburros. 1 2 3 Desarrollo de las inflorescencias de Pontederia sagittata, desde el comienzo de la apertura floral hasta la formación de la infrutescencia 8 4 7 6 5 LITERATURA CITADA ADW – Animal Diversity Web. 2013. Apis mellifera (honey bee). Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan. Disponible en: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu APG III - Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2009. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 161: 105-121. Barrett SCH. 1980. Sexual reproduction in Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth). 1. Fertility of clones from diverse regions. Journal of Applied Ecology 17: 101-112. Barrett SCH. 1989. The evolutionary breakdown of heterostyliy. In: Bock JH, Linhart YB (eds.) The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview Press, London. 151-169 pp. Barrett SCH. 1990. The evolution and adaptive significance of heterostyly. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5: 144-148. Barrett SCH. 1992. Heterostylous genetic polymorphism: model system for evolutionary analysis. In: Barrett SCH (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlín. 1-29 pp. Barrett SCH. 1993. The evolutionary biology of tristyly. In: Futuyma D, Antonovies J (eds.) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 283-326 pp. Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274- 284. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG, Husband BC. 1993. Evolutionary processes in aquatic plants. Aquatic Botany 44: 105-145. Barrett SCH, Forno IW. 1982. Style morph distribution in New World populations of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laubach (Water Hyacinth). Aquatic Botany 13: 299-306. Barrett SCH, Glover DE. 1985. On the Darwinian hypothesis of the adaptive significance of tristyly. Evolution 39: 766-774. Barrett SCH, Husband BC. 1990. Variation in outcrossing rate in Eichhornia paniculata: the role of demographic and reproductive factors. Plant Species Biology 5: 41-56. 39 Barret SCH, Shore JS. 2008. New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. In: Franklin-Tong VE (ed.) Self-Incompatibility in flowering plants – evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 3-32 pp. Berry PE, Tobe H, Gómez JA. 1991. Agamospermy and the loss of distyly in Erythroxylum undulatum (Erythroxylaceae) from Northern Venezuela. American Journal of Botany 78: 595-600. Bierzychudek P. 1987. Pollinators increase the cost of sex by avoiding female flowers. Ecology 68: 444-447. Biesmeijer JC, Giurfa M, Koedam D, Potts SG, Joel DM, Dafni A. 2005. Convergent evolution: floral guides, stingless bee nest entrances and insectivorous pitchers. Naturwissenschaften 92: 444-450. Bigot JMF. 1859. Dipterorum aliquot nova genera. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie 2(11): 305-315. Botto-Mahan C, Pohl N, Medel R. 2004. Nectar guide fluctuating asymmetry does not relate to female fitness in Mimulus luteus. Plant Ecology 174: 347-352. Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW. 2003. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426: 176-178. Breed MD, Page RE. 1989. The Genetics of Social Evolution. Westview Press. Boulder, Colorado. 213 pp. Canto-Aguilar MA, Parra-Tabla V. 2000. Importance of conserving alternative pollinators: assessing the pollination efficiency of the squash bee, Peponapis limitaris in Cucurbita moschata (Cucurbitaceae). Journal of Insect Conservation 4: 203-210. Castellanos A. 1958. Las Pontederiaceae de Brazil. Rio de Janeiro Jardín Botánico 16: 149-216. Chittka L. 1992. The colour hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency. Journal of Comparative Physiology 170: 533-543. Chittka L, Raine NE. 2006. Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9: 428-435. Chittka L, Spaethe J, Schmidt A, Hickelsberger A. 2001. Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. In: Chittka L y Thomson JD 40 (eds.) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 106-126 pp. Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM. 1999. Flower constancy, insect psychology and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86: 361-377. Conner JK, Rush S. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105: 509-516. Curran CH. 1930. New diptera from North and Central America. American Museum Novitates 415: 1-16. Da Cunha LM, Fischer E. 2009. Breeding system of tristylous Eichhornia azurea (Pontederiaceae) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. Plant Systematics and Evolution 280(1): 53-58. Dafni A, Giurfa M. 1999. The functional ecology of nectar guides in relation to insect behavior and vision. In: Waser S (ed.) Evolutionary theory and processes-modern perspectives. Kluwer Academic, Dorthrecht. 363-383 pp. Darwin CR. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London, U.K. 352 pp. Díaz-Forestier J, Gómez M, Montenegro G. 2009. Nectar volume and floral entomofauna as a tool for the implementation of sustainable apicultural management plans in Quillaja saponaria Mol. Agroforestry Systems 76: 149-162. Dobson HEM. 1988. Pollenkitt in plat reproduction. In: Bock JH y Linhart YB (eds.) The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 227-246 pp. Dos Santos IA, Wittmann D. 2000. Legitimate pollination of the tristylous flowers of Eichhornia azurea (Pontederiaceae) by Ancyloscelis gigas bees (Anthophoridae, Apoidea). Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 127-137. Eckert CG, Mavraganis K. 1996. Evolutionary consequences of extensive morph loss in tristylous Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): a shift from tristyly to distyly? American Journal of Botany 83(8): 1024-1032. Fewell J, Page RE. 1993. Genotypic variation in foraging responses to environmental stimuli by honey bees, Apis mellifera. Experientia 49: 1106-1112. 41 Forrest J, Thomson JD. 2009. Background complexity affects colour preference in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 96: 921-925. Faegri K, van der Pijl L. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York. 244 pp. Gack C. 1981. Zur Bedeutung von Staubgefä βattrappen als Signale für dir Bestäuber. Experiment emit Hummeln (Bombus terrestris). Zoologische Jahrbuecher Systematik 108: 229-246. Galen C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 882-890. Ganders FR. 1979. The Biology of Heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-635. Gegear RJ. 2005. Multicomponent floral signals elicit selective foraging in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 92: 269-271. Glaettli M, Barrett SCH. 2008. Pollinator responses to variation in floral display and flower size in dioecious Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). New Phytologist 179: 1193-1201. Glover DE, Barrett SCH. 1983. Trimorphic incompatibility in Mexican populations of Pontederia sagittata Presl. (Pontederiaceae). New Phytologist 95: 439-455. Golding YC, Sullivan MS, Sutherland JP. 1999. Visits to manipulated flowers by Epishyrpus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae): partitioning the signals of petals and anthers. Journal of Insect Behavior 12(1): 39-45. Graham SW, Kohn JR, Morton BR, Eckenwalder JE, Barrett SCH. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Systematic Biology 47: 545-567. Hansen K, Wacht S, Seebauer H, Schnuch M. 1998. New aspects of chemoreception in flies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855: 143-147. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1992. The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Functional Ecology 6: 1-7. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1993. Pollen removal from tristylous Pontederia cordata: effects of anther position and pollinator specialization. Ecology 74: 1059-1072. 42 Heuschen B, Gumbert A, Lunau K. 2005. A generalized mimicry system involving angiosperm flower colour, pollen and bumblebees´ innate colour preferences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 252: 121-137. Hill PSM, Wells PH, Wells H. 1997. Spontaneous flower constancy and learning in honey bees as a function of colour. Animal Behaviour 54: 615-627. Horridge GA. 2005. Recognition of a familiar place by the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 191: 301-316. Huber FK, Kaiser R, Sauter W, Schiestl FP. 2005. Floral scent emission and pollinator attraction in two species of Gymnadenia (Orchidaceae). Oecologia 142: 564-575. Husband BC, Barrett SCH. 1992. Pollinator visitation in populations of tristylous Eichhornia paniculata in northeastern Brazil. Oecologia 89: 365-371. Husband BC, Barrett SCH. 1998. Spatial and temporal variation in population size of Eichhornia paniculata in ephemeral habitats: implications for metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Ecology 86: 1021-1031. Ishii HS. 2006. Floral display size influences subsequent plant choice by bumblebees. Functional Ecology 20: 233-238. Kearns CA. 1992. Anthophilous fly distribution across an altitudinal elevation gradient. American Midland Naturalist 127: 172-182. Kelber A. 1997. Innate preference for flower features in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum. Journal of Experimental Biology 200: 827-836. Kelber

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    85 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us