Journal of Humanities and Education Development (JHED) ISSN: 2581-8651 Vol-1, Issue-4, Jul – Aug 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/jhed.1.4.10 The Anti-intellectual Representation of the Academia in Lucky Jim Arpita Sawhney Research Scholar, Dept. of English, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India Abstract— Lucky Jim, a famous academic novel, is an insightful work which endeavours to challenge the traditional idealistic notions of academicians. The novel aims at unveiling the camouflaged truth regarding the shallowness of the academic life. The novel satirizes the academicians who are consumed in anti-intellectual and pretentious pursuits. Thus, the very process of learning is called into question. Amis is disdainful of the pedantries of these pseudo-intellectuals and mercilessly unveils their hypocritical behavior. Keywords— Academic novel, intellectualism, eccentricity, insouciance, pseudo-intellectuals. Kingsley Amis's debut novel, Lucky Jim is an insightful work The hero, or rather the anti-hero, Jim Dixon, belongs to the which endeavours to challenge the traditional idealistic lower middle class. He is a junior lecturer in the History notions of academicians. The novel aims at unveiling the department at a provincial British university. In order to keep camouflaged truth regarding the shallowness of the academic his job, Dixon is ready to do anything. He has not made a life. It makes the reader question the glorified image of the remarkable impression upon the faculty. Therefore, he intellectuals in the profession of teaching. Shockingly, they depends upon the patronage of his superior, the absent- become the butt-of-ridicule because of their anti-intellectual minded Professor Welch, to re-epmloy him in the coming pursuits. Lucky Jim makes one wonder whether these men academic year. Dixon, now at Welch's mercy is ready to are really learned scholars or merely phonies. obey all his commands. For instance, he agrees to deliver the Lucky Jim falls in the category of campus novels. The end-of-term lecture on the subject of "Merrie England". professionals working at educational institutions are Obsessed with the fear of getting sacked, Jim also gives in to commonly associated with lofty pursuits. Contrary to the Welch's demand to join his family for a musical weekend. reader's expectations, not even a single character meets our Hence, in order to get a new tenure, Dixon “must try to expectations of highly committed intellectuals. The novel make Welch like him, and one way of doing that was, he satirizes the academicians who are consumed in anti- supposed, to be present and conscious while Welch talked intellectual and pretentious pursuits. In fact, the very process about concerts” (8). of learning is called into question. Ironically, the one in authority here, i.e. Prof. Neddy Welch, The novel, in fact, concentrates on uncovering the true nature a seemingly reputed professor is actually a disgrace to the of the so-called scholars. It investigates if there is any truth in name of scholars. He doesn't possess a single quality their apparently reputable personalities. The distinguishing befitting his status. He comes forth as nothing more than a feature of this novel is that it examines the follies of the pseudo-scholar. Drawing a highly satiric portrait of Welch, faculty instead of the students. The reader is astonished to Amis says that in Britain, “no other professor set such store find that not a single member of the faculty resonates the by being called professor” (7). highly idealized notions associated with academicians. Described as slow-witted and a pretentious bore, Welch is Deemed “ a classic comic novel” (Lodge v), Lucky Jim takes always occupied with talking about musical concerts. He the reader through “a gallery of emphatically English bores, frequently leaves his sentences unfinished which renders him cranks, frauds, and neurotic with whom Dixon(the anti-hero) inarticulate. An eccentric streak runs in him. must be content in one way or another in order to hold on his Humour arises when this shallow man's pretentious side cushy academic perch and with the girl of his fancy” (Gessen comes to the fore. He always tries hard to attract the press to ). his house for musical events. His social pretention goes on to wearing a fishing hat unnecessarily. Ironically, Ned has https://theshillonga.com/index.php/jhed Page | 208 Journal of Humanities and Education Development (JHED) ISSN: 2581-8651 Vol-1, Issue-4, Jul – Aug 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/jhed.1.4.10 never gone fishing but wears the funny hat to present himself of an industrious, respectable well-mannered young man, his as a man of traditional England. Amis justly attacks the mind seethes with caustic sarcasm directed against himself snobbery of the hypocritical high-class Britishers. and others, with fantasies of violence done to enemies, of We wonder if even a ray of wisdom can pass through this triumph for himself” (Shaffer 51). fool's mind. The reader is astounded at Welch's anti- The research article “The economic influence of the intellectual behaviour. He never shows any sign of developments in shipbuilding techniques, 1450 to 1485” is intelligence. While one expects excellent rhetorical also simply a hoax. Working on the article involved "frenzied expressions from such a highly esteemed scholar, Welch fact-grubbing and fanatical boredom"(15). disappoints one with his dull faculties. Jim, once while The saying goes - ill got, ill spent. The same holds true for driving with Welch, addresses his Professor’s dullness by the Dixon, when his not-so-original article is stolen, thinking, “Welch’s driving seemed to have improved translated and published in his own name by the editor. The slightly; at any rate, the only death Dixon felt himself latter, it seems, is shortly to become the "Chair of History of threatened by was death from exposure to boredom” (178). Commerce" in a university in Argentina. Hence, it becomes Having the decisive power over Jim's professional future, clear that the highly glorified academic life is now nothing Welch leaves no chance to exploit him. The only sign of more than a vicious circle of fraudulence and deception. One cleverness Welch shows is in making Jim follow his dictates. feels sorry at the pathetic state of the academic profession. He makes sure that the latter is willing to do his bidding. Jim has a hard time writing the one-hour-long lecture on Welch even blackmails Dixon to carry out research for him. "Merrie England" because he has no genuine interest in the The reader hardly expects such unscrupulous behaviour Medieval Ages. As a student, "the medieval papers were a from a seemingly intellectual man. Lodge opines that in soft option." This is the only reason Jim gives for Welch, Amis drew “an immortal portrait of the absent- specialising in the field. One expects an intellectual to talk mindedness, vanity, eccentricity and practical incompetence seriously about something that he firmly believes in. On the that academic institutions seem to tolerate and even to contrary, Jim lies to his profession by glorifying a time encourage”. period he is not even nostalgic for. He even shortly flirts with Surprisingly, Dixon who is the hero himself, shows to be no the idea of ending the lecture with the line - “Finally, thank better than his superior. He exhibits the same sort of God for the twentieth century” (195). frivolous behaviour as Welch. Dixon fails to provide the Then comes the seriously awaited climax, the lecture, on ideal image of an academic. Far from intellectualism, he which Jim's future depends. Conversely, the scene turns out himself turns out to be a pseudo-scholar, hardly interested in to be one of the funniest episodes in modern fiction. All the teaching and research. seriousness is blown away when Dixon reaches the venue in He is shown as an unscholarly man, preoccupied with a drunken stupor to do away with his nervousness. Upon seeking the attention of the beautiful female students in the looking at the audience, he feels “like going round and class. He has no intention, whatsoever, of trying to improve notifying each person individually of his preference that they his knowledge of medieval history. Amis says “Dixon’s should leave” (213). efforts on behalf of his special [academic] subject, apart from Due to severe intoxication Jim goes out of control, thinking how much he hated it, had been confined to aiming inadvertently imitating the voices of the College Principal to secure for it the three prettiest girls in the class” (28). and that of Professor Welch. Severely expressing his Dixon’s insouciance becomes evident when he fails to contempt for the Merrie England period, he imagines himself answer Michie, a promising student, about the syllabus of a to sound “like an unusually fanatical Nazi trooper in charge subject course he has to teach in the coming days. of a book-burning reading out to the crowd excerpts from a The peak of his anti-intellectual attitude is reached when he pamphlet written by a pacifist, Jewish, literate Communist” admits the futility of what he does. "They waste my time and (226). Naturally, Jim is sacked from the University. Hence, I theirs” (214). In making a fool out of others, Jim himself we see how Lucky Jim exposes “the academic racket, and the mocks his profession. The very sight of the department pseudo-culture and social pretentions that so often timetable makes him feel “over-mastering, orgiastic accompany it” (Phelps 430). boredom, and its companion, real hatred” (85). Jim The other faculty members of this provincial university fare unsuccessfully attempts “to show the outer world the image no better in this regard.