Draft version October 23, 2019 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 A MEASUREMENT OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND LENSING POTENTIAL AND POWER SPECTRUM FROM 500 DEG2 OF SPTPOL TEMPERATURE AND POLARIZATION DATA W. L. K. Wu1,y, L. M. Mocanu1,2,3,z, P. A. R. Ade4, A. J. Anderson5, J. E. Austermann6, J. S. Avva7, J. A. Beall6, A. N. Bender1,8, B. A. Benson1,2,5, F. Bianchini9, L. E. Bleem1,8, J. E. Carlstrom1,2,8,10,11, C. L. Chang1,2,8, H. C. Chiang12,13, R. Citron1, C. Corbett Moran14, T. M. Crawford1,2, A. T. Crites1,2,15, T. de Haan7,16, M. A. Dobbs12,17, W. Everett18, J. Gallicchio1,19, E. M. George7,20, A. Gilbert12, N. Gupta9, N. W. Halverson18,21, N. Harrington7, J. W. Henning1,8, G. C. Hilton6, G. P. Holder17,22,23, W. L. Holzapfel7, Z. Hou1, J. D. Hrubes24, N. Huang7, J. Hubmayr6, K. D. Irwin25,26, L. Knox27, A. T. Lee7,16, D. Li6,25, A. Lowitz1, A. Manzotti1,28, J. J. McMahon29, S. S. Meyer1,2,10,11, M. Millea7, J. Montgomery12,17, A. Nadolski22,23, T. Natoli1,2, J. P. Nibarger6, G. I. Noble12, V. Novosad30, Y. Omori26,31, S. Padin1,2,15, S. Patil9, C. Pryke32, C. L. Reichardt9, J. E. Ruhl33, B. R. Saliwanchik13,34, J.T. Sayre18,21, K. K. Schaffer1,11,35, C. Sievers1, G. Simard12, G. Smecher12,36, A. A. Stark37, K. T. Story26,31, C. Tucker4, K. Vanderlinde38,39, T. Veach40, J. D. Vieira22,23, G. Wang8, N. Whitehorn41, and V. Yefremenko8 Draft version October 23, 2019 ABSTRACT We present a measurement of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing potential using 500 deg2 of 150 GHz data from the SPTpol receiver on the South Pole Telescope. The lensing potential is reconstructed with signal-to-noise per mode greater than unity at lensing multipoles L . 250, using a quadratic estimator on a combination of CMB temperature and polarization maps. We report measurements of the lensing potential power spectrum in the multipole range of 100 < L < 2000 from sets of temperature-only (T), polarization-only (POL), and minimum-variance (MV) estimators. We measure the lensing amplitude by taking the ratio of the measured spectrum to the expected spectrum from the best-fit ΛCDM model to the Planck 2015 TT+lowP+lensing dataset. For the minimum- variance estimator, we find A = 0:944 0:058 (Stat:) 0:025 (Sys:); restricting to only polarization MV ± ± data, we find APOL = 0:906 0:090 (Stat:) 0:040 (Sys:). Considering statistical uncertainties alone, this is the most precise polarization-only± lensing± amplitude constraint to date (10:1 σ), and is more precise than our temperature-only constraint. We perform null tests and consistency checks and find no evidence for significant contamination. Subject headings: cosmology: cosmic background radiation, gravitational lensing, large-scale structure [email protected] Berkeley, CA, USA 94720 y [email protected] 12 Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 Rue Uni- z versity, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T8, Canada 1 Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of 17 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, CIFAR Pro- Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 gram in Cosmology and Gravity, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z8, 2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Canada Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 18 Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, Uni- 3 Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, versity of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 80309 P.O.Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway 19 Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Blvd., Claremont, CA 4 Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3XQ, United Kingdom 91711 5 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, MS209, P.O. Box 20 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 500, Batavia, IL 60510 2, 85748 Garching bei M¨unchen, Germany 6 NIST Quantum Devices Group, 325 Broadway Mailcode 21 Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, 817.03, Boulder, CO, USA 80305 CO, USA 80309 8 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Labora- 22 Astronomy Department, University of Illinois at Urbana- tory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL, USA 60439 Champaign, 1002 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL, USA 61801 arXiv:1905.05777v2 [astro-ph.CO] 22 Oct 2019 9 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 23 Department of Physics, University of Illinois Urbana- 3010, Australia Champaign, 1110 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL, USA 61801 10 Department of Physics, University of Chicago, 5640 South 24 University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 IL, USA 60637 11 Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South 26 Dept. of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 Stanford, CA 94305 13 School of Mathematics, Statistics & Computer Science, Uni- 27 Department of Physics, University of California, One versity of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA 95616 25 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill 28 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98 bis boulevard Arago, Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 75014 Paris, France 14 TAPIR, Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics, 29 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, 450 Church California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Street, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109 Pasadena, CA, USA 91125 30 Materials Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 15 California Institute of Technology, MS 249-17, 1216 E. Cal- 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL, USA 60439 ifornia Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125 31 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, 7 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, Stanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 CA, USA 94720 32 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 16 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 116 Church Street S.E. Minneapolis, MN, USA 55455 2 W. L. K. Wu, L. M. Mocanu, et al. 1. INTRODUCTION cal surveys. Furthermore, CMB lensing measurements Gravitational potentials associated with large-scale have different instrumental and astrophysical systemat- structure deflect the paths of cosmic microwave back- ics compared with those from optical surveys. The use of ground (CMB) photons as they propagate from the sur- independent probes will therefore help us investigate the face of last scattering { a process called gravitational source of the tension. It is thus an important goal for lensing (Blanchard & Schneider 1987). Gravitational us to identify potential sources of instrumental and/or lensing breaks the statistical isotropy of the CMB and astrophysical systematics as the field advances the preci- introduces correlations across CMB temperature and po- sion of CMB lensing measurements. larization fluctuations on different angular scales. These In the last few years, CMB lensing has entered the correlations are proportional to the projected gravita- era of precision measurements. This lensing effect tional potentials integrated along the line of sight and was first detected through cross correlations with ra- therefore can be used to reconstruct the lensing poten- dio sources (Smith et al. 2007). Since then, the CMB tial (Lewis & Challinor 2006). The lensing potential is lensing potential power spectrum has been measured by a probe of the growth of large-scale structure and the multiple groups using temperature data only (T, Das geometry of the universe between the epoch of recombi- et al. 2011; van Engelen et al. 2012; Planck Collaboration nation and today. Thus, from CMB observations alone, XVII 2013; Omori et al. 2017), polarization data only we can extract information about the universe at both (POL, POLARBEAR Collaboration 2014; Keck Array the redshift of last scattering (z 1100) and the red- et al. 2016), and combinations of temperature and po- ' larization data (Story et al. 2015; Sherwin et al. 2017; shifts of structure formation (z . 3) and dark energy domination. This makes CMB lensing a powerful tool Planck Collaboration et al. 2018b). The most precise for pursuing some of the most ambitious goals in cos- lensing amplitude measurement, at 40 σ, comes from mology and particle physics today (e.g. CMB-S4 Collab- Planck's minimum-variance (MV) estimator that com- oration et al. 2016), including constraining the sum of bines both temperature and polarization estimators; in neutrino masses and the amplitude of primordial gravita- that measurement, the temperature reconstruction con- tional waves (Lesgourgues & Pastor 2006; Kamionkowski tributes most of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). More & Kovetz 2016). generally, in prior lensing measurements that used both While using the CMB lensing measurements from this temperature and polarization maps, the T estimator has work, we will not detect the sum of neutrino masses always dominated the overall measurement precision. In or significantly constrain primordial gravitational waves this work, for the first time, the POL measurement is through delensing (Manzotti et al. 2017), these measure- more constraining than the T measurement. Further- ments will nevertheless provide relevant constraints to more, if we consider only the statistical uncertainty, we parameters of the standard cosmological model ΛCDM. have a 10% constraint (10:1 σ) on the lensing amplitude This is of particular interest currently because some op- using polarization data alone { the tightest constraint of tical probes of gravitational lensing are in mild tension its kind to date. In this work, we extend the lensing measurement to with Planck's CMB+lensing constraints on matter den- 2 2 sity and fluctuations (Abbott et al. 2018a; Hildebrandt a 500 deg field from the 100 deg field of Story et al. et al. 2018; Hikage et al. 2019). The optical lensing mea- (2015, hereafter S15). We build on the lensing pipeline surements use the effect of gravitational lensing on the presented in S15 with two main modifications. First, apparent shapes of background galaxies to measure the instead of including the Monte Carlo (MC) bias { the intervening gravitational potentials.