The UK 'Rebate' on the EU Budget an Explanation of the Abatement and Other Correction Mechanisms

The UK 'Rebate' on the EU Budget an Explanation of the Abatement and Other Correction Mechanisms

Briefing February 2016 The UK 'rebate' on the EU budget An explanation of the abatement and other correction mechanisms SUMMARY The UK 'abatement', 'rebate' or 'correction' is the ad hoc mechanism that is applied to lower the UK's contribution to the EU budget, by reimbursing 66% of the country's budgetary imbalance (the difference between payments and receipts). In 2014, the rebate amounted to almost €6.1 billion, reducing the UK's national contribution by 35% – to €11.34 billion – leaving it the fourth largest national contribution. All Member States but the UK cover the costs of the rebate. Introduced in 1985, it has remained unchanged in its basic concept, and is best understood with reference to some features of the UK economy and of the common budget at that time. Each year, the amount of the rebate is determined by a complex calculation, linked to several variables and which has evolved over time to take into account developments in the EU and its financing system. Included in the Own Resources Decision, modification of which requires unanimity of the Member States, the rebate is de facto a permanent mechanism. Following the creation of the rebate, other Member States argued that their EU budgetary burden was excessive, asking for reductions in their contributions, including to their financing of the UK rebate itself. This has led to a complex system of ad hoc permanent and temporary corrections. For 2014-2020, Member States other than the UK benefiting from explicit corrections on the revenue side of the EU budget are: Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Correction mechanisms have attracted a number of criticisms, not least that they make the finances of the EU more complex, less transparent, less fair and harder to reform. Past proposals to replace the existing ad hoc mechanisms with a single new one, open to any Member State meeting defined conditions in terms of budgetary imbalances, have not been successful. In this briefing: Definition and scale Objective, origin and legal basis Calculation and financing of the rebate Other correction mechanisms Stakeholders' and analysts' views Past reform proposals Annex Main references EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Alessandro D'Alfonso Members' Research Service PE 577.973 EN EPRS The UK rebate on the EU budget Definition and scale Introduced in 1985, the UK 'rebate', or 'correction', is the mechanism applied to lower the United Kingdom's national contribution1 to the EU budget. This reduction amounts to roughly 66% of the difference between the UK's contributions to, and receipts from, the EU budget. The basic concept of the rebate has remained the same since its creation, but its method of calculation has evolved over time to take account of a number of factors, including some developments in the system of financing of the EU budget,2 and the successive enlargements of the European Union that have taken place since 30 April 2004 (to include 11 Member States from central and eastern Europe, as well as Cyprus and Malta). The amount of the UK rebate changes every year, since it depends on many different variables, including statistical aggregates such as gross national income (GNI) and the harmonised value added tax (VAT) base in EU Member States. In 2014, the reimbursement paid to the UK amounted to almost €6.1 billion, reducing the country's national contribution by 35% to some €11.34 billion,3 and making it the fourth largest national contributor after Germany (€25.81 billion), France (€19.57 billion) and Italy (€14.36 billion). Table 1 shows the reimbursements paid to the United Kingdom under the rebate mechanism since 1985. Table 1 – UK's gross and final national contributions to the EU budget, and impact of the rebate on the reduction of the UK's gross national contributions (%): 1985-2014 (in ECU million until 1998 and € million from 1999)4 Year Gross UK Rebate Final Year Gross UK Rebate Final National rebate as % of National National rebate as % of National Contribution (A) Contribution Contribution (A) Contribution (A) (A) 1985 4 188.1 981.4 23% 3 206.6 2000 14 103.4 3 420.8 24% 10 682.6 1986 4 472.3 1 871.1 42% 2 601.2 2001 11 977.0 7 342.5 61% 4 634.4 1987 4 857.5 1 631.0 34% 3 226.4 2002 13 019.2 4 933.5 38% 8 085.7 1988 5 230.6 2 407.3 46% 2 823.3 2003 13 056.7 5 184.9 40% 7 872.1 1989 5 570.2 1 723.4 31% 3 846.9 2004 14 650.9 5 272.1 36% 9 378.9 1990 6 543.0 2 375.3 36% 4 167.6 2005 14 815.9 5 185.8 35% 9 630.2 1991 5 831.2 3 562.6 61% 2 268.6 2006 15 052.3 5 221.4 35% 9 830.2 1992 6 874.3 2 580.2 38% 4 294.1 2007 15 963.2 5 188.9 33% 10 771.9 1993 8 289.2 3 155.8 38% 5 133.4 2008 13 870.9 6 252.0 45% 7 613.8 1994 6 135.1 2 294.9 37% 3 840.2 2009 12 922.4 5 657.7 44% 7 879.6 1995 8 022.1 1 449.3 18% 6 572.8 2010 15 626.8 3 562.7 23% 12 145.8 1996 8 440.7 2 913.8 35% 5 518.3 2011 14 780.3 3 595.9 24% 11 273.4 1997 8 315.6 2 431.3 29% 5 884.2 2012 17 185.8 3 803.6 22% 13 461.1 1998 12 799.1 3 153.5 25% 9 645.5 2013 18 757.3 4 329.5 23% 14 509.5 1999 11 881.7 3 576.6 30% 8 305.2 2014 17 457.5 6 066.3 35% 11 341.6 Source: EPRS based on European Commission data (2008-2014 Financial Reports). Members' Research Service Page 2 of 12 EPRS The UK rebate on the EU budget Objective, origin and legal basis The objective of the rebate is to reduce and correct, in favour of the United Kingdom, the negative budgetary balance the country has when comparing its contribution to the EU budget with the share of EU spending that it receives in return. The question of the UK's budgetary imbalances has been a source of debate and friction since the country joined the then-European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973. It was also one of the main topics under the spotlight during the June 1975 referendum, when UK voters supported continued EEC membership. The historical context helps to understand the issue, which relates to a number of features of the UK economy and the EEC's finances in the 1970s and 1980s. On the one hand, the UK had a small agricultural sector, whereas most Community spending went on agriculture (some 70% in 1984- 1985). On the other hand, the system of financing of the Community budget, which was then being implemented progressively, had as its main source of revenue an own resource related to Member States' VAT bases, alongside customs duties. In the UK, the VAT base in comparison with gross national product (GNP) was proportionally higher than in other Member States. In addition, the UK was more open than other Member States to trade with non-EEC countries. The combined effect of all these factors was a structurally negative budgetary balance for the UK, which at the time was among the less well-off Member States, with a per capita income lower than the EEC average. Following two temporary correction mechanisms agreed at European Council meetings in 1975 and 1979, the UK rebate was based on a new agreement reached by Member States at a European Council meeting held at Fontainebleau, France, in June 1984. Member State governments declared that 'expenditure policy is ultimately the essential means of resolving the question of budgetary imbalances', but they also established a principle, whereby any country 'sustaining a budgetary burden which is excessive in relation to its relative prosperity may benefit from a correction at the appropriate time'. The financial provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Part Six, Title II) make no reference to correction mechanisms, which therefore rest on the conclusions of the European Council meeting of June 1984. The 'Fontainebleau principles' do not define the concepts of excessive budgetary burden and relative prosperity, leaving them open to interpretation. In 1985, the UK rebate was included in the Own Resources Decision that governs the financing of the common budget. The UK rebate has thus become de facto permanent, since unanimity of the Member States is required to change this Decision. Council Decision (EC, Euratom) 2007/436 is the legal basis currently in force for the system of own resources of the EU, pending ratification of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2014/335, which will apply retroactively from 1 January 2014 once in force. In both the 2007 and 2014 Own Resources Decisions, the provisions on the UK correction are found in Articles 4 (calculation) and 5 (financing). Calculation and financing of the rebate On the basis of the agreed Own Resources Decision, the European Commission details the method used to calculate and finance the UK correction in a working document, with a view to reflecting and implementing the decision made at European Council level. The Member States unanimously endorse the method set out in that working document, alongside the formal adoption of the Own Resources Decision.5 Members' Research Service Page 3 of 12 EPRS The UK rebate on the EU budget While the basic concept of the rebate has remained unchanged since its creation, its calculation has grown in complexity.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us