J-M Hombert and R. Grollemund Dynamique Du Langage, Lyon

J-M Hombert and R. Grollemund Dynamique Du Langage, Lyon

A phylogenetic classification of Grassfields and closely related Bantu languages J-M Hombert and R. Grollemund Dynamique du Langage, Lyon Workshop 1« Bantu and its closest relatives » Berlin, April 7-9, 2011 « The questions raised by these (Grassfields) languages have a broad significance not only for African historical linguistics and general linguistic theory, but beyond this to the whole panoply of historical disciplines which are concerned with the problem of how and when the vast areas of East, Central and Southern Africa came to be settled by their present Bantu-speaking inhabitants » Joseph Greenberg (1980, 39) Bennett and Sterk (1977) South Bantoid languages (Ethnologue) • Beboid (14) • Ekoid (8) • Jarawan (15) • Mamfe (3) • Mbam (13) • Mbe (1) • Narrow Bantu (522) • Ndemli (1) • Tikar (1) • Tivoid (17) • Wide Grassfields (67) Bantoid languages • 150 languages (excluding bantu languages) • Comparative work by K. Willamson, R Blench, J.Watters and P. Piron. (J. Good on Beboid) • Genetic link between bantoid non bantu and bantu languages Grassfields languages • One linguistic unit? • Internal classification • External classification • Connection with Narrow Bantu Piron (1995) • Internal classification of 169 bantoïd languages (82 non-bantu), 100-8 words • Three types of lexicostatistical methods NN: nearest neighbour FN: furthest neighbour BA: branch average Piron (1995) Piron (1995) Grassfields external classification • Proximity with Nyang and Ekoid • Connections with – Beboid – Tivoid – Jarawan from Watters (2003:226) Piron (1995) Wide Grassfields - Piron (1995) • Same representation in 3 methods • Ndemli is within Narrow Grassfields • Nun and Bamileke are not clearly separated • Two branches (in BA): - Eastern Grassfields, Ring, Momo, Ndemli - Ambele, Amasi, Modele (Menchum) Ring (Piron, 1995) Eastern Grassfields • Dialectal continum • Four groups : Bamileke, Ngemba, Noun and North • Questions : – Should the northern group be a separate branch (and the three other branches grouped together)? – Three groups: North, Ngemba (including Ngemba and Noun) and South (Bamileke) in Elias et al. (1984) – No barrier between Noun and Bamileke (Piron, 1995) Blench’s SW Grassfields (Western Momo) Grassfields Internal classification • One genetic unit? • Narrow vs. Wide Grassfields • Wide Grassfields : – Western Momo/ SW Grassfields – Ambele – Menchum • Narrow Grassfields – Inclusion of Ndemli – Eastern vs. Momo and Ring (Western?) – Eastern Grassfields : • North group? • Noun group? Grassfields Bantu Working group • 1974 : Fieldwork on Noun class system in 50 languages • 1977 : Les Classes nominales dans le Bantou des Grassfields. Viviers colloquium. Publication in 1980 (Hyman and Voorhoeve) • 1978 : Fieldwork on descriptive and comparative grassfields • 1980 : Noun Classes in the Grassfields Bantu Borderland, SCOPIL 8 • 1984 : comparative Mbam-Nkam (Elias et al.) • Results : Grassfields languages are a unit BUT some languages (Eastern languages) satisfy NB criteria (Greenberg-Crabb) but not Ring and Momo branches • « The notion that the nasal prefixes can define a genetic unit is false » (Hyman, 1980, 207) Stallcup (1980:55), Hyman • Eastern Grassfields Bantu Western Grassfields Bantu • a. nasal prefix in class 1 and class 3 nouns absence of the nasal • b. no distinction between class 6 and class 6a distinction between class 6 a- and class 6a m´- • c. nasal prefix on all 9/10 nouns nasal prefix only on some 9/10 nouns • d. absence of classes 4 and 13; class 19 rare presence of classes 4 and 13; class 19 frequent • e. noun prefixes all carry a /L/ tone most noun prefixes carry a /H/ tone • f. no noun suffixes many noun suffixes, e.g. plural -tí , -sí • g. class 2 or 6a generalizes to mark plural class 10 or 13 generalizes to mark plural • h. innovation of -sí ng ‘bird’, -kì ´e ‘water’ maintenance of *-noní ‘bird’, *-díbá ‘water’ • i. maintenance of *-úmà ‘thing’ *-úmà is lost, other roots come in • Plus: maintenance of inherited 3rd person introduction of new 3rd person pronouns Grassfields lexical innovations • cheek *- gek LH • egg *- bum LH • leaf, medecine *- fu LH • mouth *- cul LL • sheep *-ji(e)l L • to rub *- jok H • quatre *- kua L Hombert (1979) • 108 mots, • 30 langues (17 Narrow Grassfields, 1 West Momo, 2 Menchum, 2 Tvoid,,4 Beboid, 1 Ekoid, 1 Mbam and 2 Narrow Bantu (A40 et J22)) • Data analysis : Minimum, Maximum and MDS • Results: • Unity of Grassfields • Exclusion of Ambele and Modele from Narrow Grassfields • Northern group belongs to Eastern Grassfields • Jukunoid • Tivoid • Beboid • Ekoid • Grassfields • Narrow Bantu • References • Bastin, Y. and Piron, P. (1999) Classifications lexicostatistiques: bantou, bantou et bantoide. • De l’intérêt des ‘groupes flottants’, in Hombert and Hyman (eds) 149–64. • Bastin, Y., Coupez, A. and Mann, M. (1999) Continuity and divergence in the Bantu languages: • perspectives from a lexicostatistic study , Tervuren: MRAC. • Bennett, P. R. and Sterk, J. P. (1977) South Central Niger-Congo: a reclassification, SAL 8.3: • 241–73. • • Blench, R (1993) New developments in the classification of Bantu languages and their implications , • in Barreteau and Von Graffenried (eds) Datation et chronologie dans le bassin du Lac Tchad. Paris : ORSTOM, 147-160 • —— (2009) The structure of Bantoid: new evidence and better models, Paper presented at Wocal, Köln, Aug 17-21 • http://www.rogerblench.info/Language%20data/Niger-Congo/Bantoid/General/Blench%20WOCAL%202009.htm • —— The Momo and ‘Western Momo’ languages : Branches of Grassfdields • http://www.rogerblench.info/Language%20data/Niger-Congo/Bantoid/Grassfields/Momo/Classification%20of%20Momo%20and%20West%20Momo.pdf • • Boum, M. A. (1980) Le groupe Menchum: morphologie nominale, in Hyman (ed.) (1980) 73–82. • • Dieu, M. and Renaud, P. (1983) Atlas Linguistique du Cameroun , Paris: Agence de coopération culturelle et technique • and Yaoundé: ACCT/CERDOTOLA/DGRST. • • Elias, P., Leroy, J. and Voorhoeve, J. (1984) Mbam-Nkam or Eastern Grassfields, AU 67: 31–107. • • Hombert, J.-M. (1976) Noun classes and tone in Ngie, in Hyman (ed.) (1976a) 3–22. • —— (1979) Classification of Grassfields languages, Paper presented at Leyden Conference, printed Dieu and Renaud (1983, 134-144) • —— (1980) Le groupe noun, in Hyman and Voorhoeve (eds) 143–63. • —— (1980) Noun classes of the Beboid languages, in Hyman 1980, SCOPIL 8, 83-98 • • Hombert, J.-M. and Hyman, L. M. (eds) (1999) Bantu historical linguistics: theoretical and • empirical perspectives , Stanford: CSLI • • Hyman, L.M. (ed.) (1980) Noun classes in the Grassfields Bantu borderland , Los Angeles: University of Southern California. SCOPIL 8. • • Hyman, L. M. and Voorhoeve, J. (eds) (1980) Les classes nominales dans le bantou des Grassfields. • L’expansion bantoue, vol. I . Paris: SELAF. • • Leroy, J. (1994) Le Mbam-Nkam ou Est-Grassfield, Africana Linguistica XI, 142, 135-140 • • Piron, P. (1995) Identification lexicostatistique des groupes bantoides stables, JWAL 25.2: 3–30. • ——(1997) Classification interne du group bantoïde , Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa. • Stallcup, K. (1980) La géographie linguistique des Grassfields, in Hyman and Voorhoeve (eds) • 43–57. • ——(1980) The Momo languages, in Hyman and Voorhoeve (eds) 193–224. • • Watters, J. R (1982) Review of Hyman and Voorhoeve (eds), JALL 4: 87–92. • —— (1989) Bantoid overview, in Bendor-Samuel (ed.) 400–20. • —— (2003) Grassfields Bantu in Nurse and Philippson (eds)225-256 • • Watters, J. R. and Leroy, J. (1989) Southern Bantoid, in Bendor-Samuel (ed.) 430–49. • Thank you…..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    34 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us