
<p><strong>KiNativ® In situ kinase profiling </strong></p><p><strong>Stanford University ChEM-H </strong></p><p><em>c</em><a href="/goto?url=https://twitter.com/KiNativPlatform" target="_blank"><em>onfidential </em></a></p><p>@KiNativPlatform </p><p><strong>Principle of the KiNativ platform </strong></p><p>• ATP (or ADP) acyl phosphate binds to, and covalently modifies </p><p>Lysine residues in the active site <br>• Thus, ATP acyl phosphate with a desthiobiotin tag can be used capture and quantitate kinases in a complex lysate </p><p><strong>Acyl phosphate </strong></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Desthiobiotin tag </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>ATP </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>2</p><p><strong>ATP acyl phosphate probe covalently modifies kinase in the active site </strong></p><p><strong>Lysine 2 </strong></p><p><strong>Lysine 1 </strong></p><p>3</p><p><strong>ATP acyl phosphate probe covalently modifies kinase in the active site </strong></p><p><strong>Lysine 2 </strong></p><p><strong>Lysine 1 </strong></p><p>4</p><p><strong>Samples trypsinized, probe-labeled peptides captured with streptavidin, and analyzed by targeted LC-MS</strong><sup style="top: -0.7em;"><strong>2 </strong></sup></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Identification </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Quantitation </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Explicit determination of peptide sequence and probe modification site from MS</strong><sup style="top: -0.35em;"><strong>2 </strong></sup><strong>spectrum </strong><br><strong>Integration of signal from MS</strong><sup style="top: -0.35em;"><strong>2 </strong></sup><strong>fragment ions </strong></p><p>5</p><p><strong>Comprehensive Coverage of Protein and Lipid Kinases </strong></p><p><strong>Protein kinases </strong><br><strong>Atypical kinases </strong></p><p> <br> </p><p><strong>Green: Kinases detected on KiNativ Red: Kinases not detected on KiNativ </strong></p><p>~80% of known protein and atypical kinases identified on the platform </p><p><a href="/goto?url=http://www.kinativ.com/coverage/protein-lipid.html" target="_blank">http://www.kinativ.com/coverage/protein-lipid.html </a></p><p>6</p><p><strong>Profiling compound(s) on the KiNativ platform </strong></p><p><strong>Control sample – add probe </strong></p><p><strong>Sample: Lysate </strong></p><p><strong>derived from any </strong></p><p><strong>cell line or tissue </strong></p><p><strong>Treated sample – add inhibitor followed by probe </strong></p><p><strong>from ANY species </strong></p><p><strong>Inhibited </strong></p><p><strong>kinase </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Green: Kinases </li><li style="flex:1">Blue: Probe </li></ul><p>Gray: Non-kinases Red: Inhibitor </p><p>7</p><p><strong>Profiling compound(s) on the KiNativ platform </strong></p><p><strong>Control sample – add probe </strong></p><p><strong>Sample: Lysate </strong></p><p><strong>derived from any </strong></p><p><strong>cell line or tissue </strong></p><p><strong>Treated sample – add inhibitor followed by probe </strong></p><p><strong>from ANY species </strong></p><p><strong>Inhibited kinase </strong></p><p><strong>Time </strong></p><p>8</p><p><strong>KiNativ – Displaying processed data </strong></p><p>9</p><p><strong>KiNativ profiling formats </strong></p><p>• <strong>Lysate </strong></p><p>• Compound(s) added to lysate prepared from relevant cell line/tissue </p><p>followed by probe </p><p>• Efficient approach to determine on-target potency and selectivity </p><p>• <strong>Live cell </strong></p><p>• Compound(s) added to cells for a period of time, after which cells are harvested, washed, lysed and probe-labeled </p><p>• Confirm cell permeability and compound MOA, i.e., how well does </p><p>on-target potency (KiNativ) compare to EC50 values from a cellbased assay </p><p>• <em>Note: 10X dilution during lysis prior to probe addition, reversible compounds may re-equilibrate with target(s) </em></p><p>• <strong>Live animal </strong></p><p>• Animals treated with compound, after which they are sacrificed, relevant tissues harvested, snap-frozen and sent out for profiling on KiNativ </p><p>• <em>Recommended 100 mg tissue per sample </em></p><p>10 </p><p><strong>Why profile compounds on KiNativ – A study of JAK inhibitors </strong></p><p>• Compounds profiled in PBMC lysate </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Upadacitinib* </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Ruxolitinib* </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Baricitinib* </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Tofacitinib* </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>JAKs </strong></p><p><strong>Fedratinib* </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Filgotinib </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Abrocitinib </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Pacritinib </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>*Clinically approved compounds </p><p>11 </p><p><strong>Why profile compounds on KiNativ – A study of JAK inhibitors </strong></p><p>• KiNativ IC50 values for selected JAK inhibitors, PBMC lysate </p><p>*Clinically approved compounds </p><p>12 </p><p><strong>Comparing JAK1/TYK2 pIC</strong><sub style="top: 0.66em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub><strong>to cell-based pEC</strong><sub style="top: 0.66em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>KiNativ </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Recombinant </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Abrocitinib </strong><br><strong>Ruxolitinib </strong><br><strong>Filgotinib </strong><br><strong>Tofacitinib </strong></p><p><strong>Pacritinib </strong><br><strong>Abrocitinib </strong></p><p><strong>Ruxolitinib </strong></p><p><strong>Baricitinib </strong><br><strong>Baricitinib </strong><br><strong>Pacritinib </strong></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Upadacitinib </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Upadacitinib </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Tofacitinib </strong><br><strong>Fedratinib </strong></p><p><strong>Filgotinib Fedratinib </strong></p><p><strong>IC</strong><sub style="top: 0.24em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub><strong>and EC</strong><sub style="top: 0.24em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub><strong>values within 3-fold </strong></p><p>Cell-based assay: Monitor inhibition of INFα dependent pSTAT1 in Jurkat cells </p><p>13 </p><p><strong>Comparing JAK2 pIC</strong><sub style="top: 0.66em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub><strong>to cell- based pEC</strong><sub style="top: 0.66em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>KiNativ </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Recombinant </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Ruxolitinib </strong><br><strong>Fedratinib </strong></p><p><strong>Pacritinib </strong></p><p><strong>Filgotinib </strong><br><strong>Baricitinib </strong><br><strong>Tofacitinib </strong><br><strong>Fedratinib </strong></p><p><strong>Tofacitinib </strong><br><strong>Ruxolitinib </strong></p><p><strong>Baricitinib </strong><br><strong>Filgotinib </strong><br><strong>Baricitinib </strong></p><p><strong>Upadacitinib </strong><br><strong>Upadacitinib </strong></p><p><strong>Pacritinib </strong></p><p><strong>Abrocitinib </strong><br><strong>Abrocitinib </strong></p><p><strong>IC</strong><sub style="top: 0.24em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub><strong>and EC</strong><sub style="top: 0.24em;"><strong>50 </strong></sub><strong>values within 3-fold </strong></p><p>Cell-based assay: Monitor inhibition of pSTAT5 in HEL cells </p><p>14 </p><p><strong>Quantifying the selectivity of kinase inhibitors </strong></p><p>• One of the main reasons for profiling inhibitors against a panel of kinases is to assess selectivity </p><p>• Assessing selectivity can be arbitrary! </p><p><strong>Method to quantify selectivity – Selectivity score (S) </strong></p><p>• Based on the method described by Piotr Grazcyk “<strong>Gini </strong></p><p><strong>Coefficient:ꢀ A New Way To Express Selectivity of Kinase </strong></p><p><strong>Inhibitors against a Family of Kinases</strong>” </p><p>doi.org/10.1021/jm070562u <br>• Profile compound at 2-4 doses, estimate IC50s • Convert IC50s to pIC50s and normalize to target pIC50, i.e., on- </p><p>target normalized pIC50 = 1 </p><p>• Plot the normalized IC50s against the targets and determine area under the curve <br>• Reciprocal of the area under the curve = <strong>Selectivity score (S) </strong><br>(higher the score, more selective the compound) </p><p>15 </p><p><strong>Quantifying Selectivity – JAK inhibitors </strong></p><p>• Approved JAK inhibitors had good selectivity scores </p><p><strong>Upadacitinib* S = 9.2 </strong></p><p>• Fedratinib, an approved JAK2 inhibitor for </p><p><strong>Tofacitinib* </strong><br><strong>S = 7.9 </strong></p><p><strong>Baricitinib* </strong><br><strong>S = 7.8 </strong></p><p>myeloproliferative diseases had a surprisingly low </p><p><strong>Ruxolitinib* S = 7.0 </strong></p><p>selectivity score </p><p><strong>Abrocitinib</strong><sup style="top: -0.35em;"><strong># </strong></sup><strong>S = 6.0 </strong></p><p><strong>Off-targets </strong></p><p><strong>Filgotinib^ </strong></p><p><strong>Fedratinib* </strong></p><p><strong>Pacritinib^ </strong></p><p><strong>S = 5.8 </strong></p><p><strong>S = 3.7 </strong></p><p><strong>S = 3.0 </strong></p><p><strong>more potently inhibited than on-target </strong></p><p>* Clinically approved compounds <sup style="top: -0.3em;"># </sup>Undergoing clinical trials ^ Failed clinical trials </p><p><strong>More potent on-target activity </strong><br><strong>The steeper the slope, </strong></p><p><strong>the fewer off-targets were observed </strong></p><p>16 </p><p><strong>Kinases </strong></p><p><strong>Efficacy of Fedratinib may be due to an off-target </strong></p><p>• Cell-killing efficacy was </p><p><strong>Baricitinib </strong></p><p>determined for Baricitinib and Fedratinib in either HEL or Jurkat cells </p><p>• HEL cells are driven by constitutively active JAK2 (V617F) </p><p>• Jurkat cells are not known to have any aberrations in JAK signaling pathways </p><p><strong>HEL Jurkat </strong></p><p><strong>Fedratinib </strong></p><p>• Baricitinib, a potent JAK2 </p><p>inhibitor kills HEL cells significantly more potently than Jurkat, while Fedratinib kills HEL and Jurkat cells with similar potencies </p><p>17 </p><p><strong>Profiling the covalent BTK inhibitor Ibrutinib </strong></p><p>• Ramos cells were treated with Ibrutinib (10 and 1 µM, and no-inhibitor control) for one hour </p><p>• Cells were then washed, harvested and lysed </p><p>• Lysate was divided into two parts and either probe-labeled as is, or gelfiltered and then probe-labeled </p><p>18 </p><p><strong>Profiling Ibrutinib in Ramos cells </strong></p><p>• Ibrutinib modifies BTK on Cys-481 (highlighted) </p><p>• For all kinases that appear to be covalently modified by Ibrutinib, there is a <br>Cys residue either precisely aligned with BTK Cys-481, or in close proximity </p><p>19 </p><p><strong>Profiling kinases during cell cycle progression </strong></p><p>Confluent cells </p><p><strong>Profiling kinases in A375 during cell cycle progression (kinase activities compared to 0 h) </strong></p><p>Sub-culture </p><p>Harvest cells at </p><p>various </p><p>times after subculturing, analyze by MS </p><p>0 h <br>8 h </p><p>32 h </p><p><strong>1.5X 0.67X </strong></p><p>96 h </p><p><strong>Kinases </strong></p><p>20 </p><p><strong>Profiling kinases during cell cycle progression </strong></p><p>Confluent cells </p><p><strong>Profiling kinases in A375 during cell cycle progression (kinase activities compared to 0 h) </strong></p><p><strong>MS Signal ratio </strong></p><p>Sub-culture </p><p><strong>Increases </strong></p><p>Harvest cells at </p><p>various </p><p>times after subculturing, analyze by MS </p><p>0 h <br>8 h </p><p>32 h </p><p>96 h </p><p><strong>Decreases </strong><br>• <strong>These dynamic changes in the kinome may be modulated by kinase inhibitors </strong><br>• <strong>Long-term treatment of cells with inhibitors might result in the observation of changes in the kinome due to pathway effects, in addition to the direct targets </strong></p><p>21 </p><p><strong>Profiling the CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor Palbociclib, in Colo-205 cells </strong></p><p>• Palbociclib is an FDA approved CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor for the treatment of ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer </p><p>• The compound exhibits a wide-range of potencies in cell-killing assays • The molecular basis determining sensitivity or resistance to the compound is not fully understood </p><p><strong>Palbociclib </strong></p><p>22 </p><p><strong>Profiling Palbociclib in either sensitive (Colo205) or resistant (MDA-MB-486) cells – live cell format </strong></p><p><strong>Colo205 (sensitive) </strong><br><strong>1µM Palbociclib </strong><br><strong>MDA-MB-468 (resistant) </strong><br><strong>1µM Palbociclib </strong></p><p>1.5X </p><p><strong>Direct </strong><br><strong>Direct Indirect </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Kinases </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Kinases </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Chemoproteomic Evaluation of Target Engagement by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitor Palbociclib Correlates with Cancer Cell Response </strong></p><p>DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00629 </p><p>23 </p><p><strong>Profiling Palbociclib in either sensitive (Colo205) or resistant (MDA-MB-486) cells – live cell format </strong></p><p>• CDK4 is not inhibited in MDA-MB-468 cells, although the other palbociclib targets are inhibited to the same extent </p><p><strong>MS Signal ratio [(Treated)/(Control)] </strong></p><p><strong>Direct targets </strong></p><p><strong>Pathway effects </strong></p><p>24 </p><p><strong>Mechanistic basis for sensitivity/resistance of cells to CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors </strong></p><p>• Elevated levels of CDKN2 </p><p>proteins, but not CDKN1 proteins inhibit both the binding of ATP probe and inhibitor to CDK4 and CDK6 </p><p>• Observation is consistent with </p><p>the fact that CDKN2 proteins bind CDK4 and CDK6, while CDKN1 proteins bind CDK2 </p><p>MCF7 cells were transfected with either GFP or </p><p>various CDKN proteins, lysates were then generated, probe-labeled and analyzed by KiNativ </p><p><strong>Direct CDKN2 Modulation of CDK4 Alters Target Engagement of CDK4 Inhibitor Drugs </strong></p><p>DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0755 </p><p>25 </p><p><strong>Vemurafenib, selective BRAF inhibitor versus LY3009210, pan-RAF inhibitor </strong></p><p>• Vemurafenib is a potent BRAF inhibitor while LY3009120 also inhibits <br>ARAF and RAF1 </p><p>• Vemurafenib is only efficacious in cells driven by V600E BRAF while <br>LY3009120 is efficacious in both V600E BRAF cells, as well as in cells driven by activating RAS mutants </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Vemurafenib </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>LY3009120 </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>26 </p><p><strong>Profiling Vemurafenib pathway effects in A375 (V600E BRAF), HCT116 (G13D K-RAS), and PC3 (WT RAF, WT RAS) cells, 48 hours </strong></p><p><strong>MS Signal ratio [(Treated)/(Control)] </strong></p><p><strong>V600E BRAF </strong><br><strong>G13D KRAS </strong><br><strong>WT </strong></p><p>• Target engagement observed in both sensitive and resistant cells </p><p><strong>Direct </strong></p><p><strong>targets </strong></p><p>• Pathway effects predominantly observed in sensitive cells (V600E BRAF) </p><p><strong>Pathway effects </strong></p><p>• Hyper phosphorylation of <br>MEK and ERK in RAS- driven cells may result in HCT116 cells being less sensitive to Vemurafenib than PC3 </p><p>27 </p><p><strong>Profiling LY3009120 pathway effects in A375 </strong></p><p><strong>(V600E BRAF), HCT116 (G13D K-RAS), and PC3 (WT RAF, WT RAS) cells, 48 hours </strong></p><p><strong>MS Signal ratio [(Treated)/(Control)] </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>V600E BRAF G13D KRAS </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>WT </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>• Similar to Vemurafenib, </p><p>LY3009120 binds RAF </p><p>kinases in sensitive </p><p><strong>Direct targets </strong></p><p>and resistant cells <br>• In contrast to </p><p><strong>Similar </strong></p><p><strong>pathway effects </strong></p><p>Vemurafenib, pathways </p><p>effects are observed in </p><p>both V600E BRAF and G13D KRAS driven cell lines </p><p><strong>Different </strong></p><p><strong>pathway </strong></p><p><strong>effects </strong></p><p>28 </p><p><strong>Profiling the Aurora kinase inhibitor Alisertib – G2/M arrest </strong></p><p><strong>MS Signal ratio [(Treated)/(Control)] </strong></p><p>PLK1, CDK9, ROCK, FAM20B </p><p><strong>Direct targets </strong></p><p>EphR </p><p><strong>1 hour 24 hours 48 hours </strong></p><p>Aurora </p><p><strong>Pathway effects </strong></p><p><strong>Kinases </strong></p><p>• Aurora kinase inhibitors induce G2/M arrest in contrast to CDK and RAF inhibitors which induce G0/G1 arrest </p><p>• PLK1 is downregulated during G0/G1 arrest, but upregulated at G2/M arrest </p><p>29 </p><p><strong>Acyl phosphate GTP probe modifies GTPases at a conserved lysine in the phosphate binding loop (P site) </strong></p><p><strong>GTP probe </strong></p><p><strong>Phosphate </strong></p><p><strong>binding loop </strong></p><p><strong>Lysine residue </strong></p><p>30 </p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages36 Page
-
File Size-