Interpolation and Oversampling in Data Converters. Trade-Offs

Interpolation and Oversampling in Data Converters. Trade-Offs

Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov December 14, 2012 Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Upsampling and interpolation What is interpolation and why do we need it. Upsampler L H(z) fs Lfs Low−Pass Filter n 1 2 3 n n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Basic principle of interpolation Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Upsampling and interpolation The upsampled sequence, apart from the baseband, contains L-1 images of it over the spectrum These ideally should not be there That is what the LP filter does (the actual interpolation) The upsampler only insets zeros (to achieve the desired sampling frequency) Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Upsampling and interpolation Spectrum of the three nodes of the interpolator (original, upsampled and interpolated). X pi 2pi 2Lpi wT X1 LP filter response 2pi pi/L 2pi/L wT1 Y pi/L pi 2pi wT1 Original, upsampled and interpolated sequences Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Upsampling and its effect with respect to aliasing However, in another case we need to go down to the original sampling rate as before The upsampled signal must be further filtered to suppress Fs frequencies over 2 (to avoid aliasing in the downsampling process) This however can also happen digitally together with the process of downsampling (discarding samples) in a so called decimation filter H(z) M Mfs fs Downsampling (decimation filter) Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Upsampling and its effect with respect to aliasing One benefit of upsampling is that reduces the need of having precision time constant AA filter E Signal of Interest First Alias F 0 B Fs/2 FS F E Signal of Interest Anti−imaging Filter Response First Alias 0 FB LF /2 F S LFS Upsampling for AA filter precision reduction Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Oversampling cont'd In terms of filter costs we can deduce that oversampling trades-off analog vs. digital circuitry A short example: fclk=30MHz f0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 F [MHz] ' fclk =2xf clk f0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 F [MHz] Analog filter requirements for different fs Doubling fs gives us a reduction of 10 to 5-6 pole filter (assuming 60dB attenuation and 6dB attenuation/pole) Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Oversampling cont'd For the case we mentioned: OSR FIR “firpmord" Analog (Parks-McClellan) AI filter 2 23 5 ∼ 6 4 37 2 ∼ 3 8 57 1 ∼ 2 16 103 1 32 195 1 64 381 1 One of the many imperical high-level power estimations for analog filters [1]: 2 2 Pa = 2 × N × η × Vdd × fcut−off × DR (1) and for direct form digital filter [2]: αcoef f Pd (N; coef ; I ; f ) = (N × (γ × coef + !)) × (I ) × (2) f0 Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Oversampling cont'd fs Lfs x[n] x[m] L z−1 z−1 z−1 z−1 z−1 x[n] E0(z) a b c d e f y[m] y[m] E1(z) n a b c d e f tap EL−1(z) 0 0 . y0 1 x 0 . y1 y0 = a0 2 x x 0 . y2 y1 = b0 3 1 x x 0 . y3 y2 = c0 4 x 1 x x 0 . y4 y3 = a1 + d0 5 x x 1 x x 0 y5 y4 = b1 + e0 6 2 x x 1 x x y6 y5 = c1 + f0 7 x 2 x x 1 x y7 y6 = a2 + d1 8 x x 2 x x 1 y8 y7 = b2 + e1 y8 = c2 + f1 Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Oversampling cont'd More efficient IIR filters can be designed: - Butterworth, Cauer, Chebyshev Digital filters are also by far not ideal: - Filter coefficients precision (coefficient quantization) - Quantization of internal variables - Fixed vs floating point arithmetic - Rounding/truncation - Potential instability (IIR) To sum-up: the interpolation block by itself may not be easy to design FIR FILTERS IIR FILTERS Easy to design Require more effort Always stable May be unstable Linear phase response Non-linear phase response Less efficient More efficient Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Oversampling cont'd Apart from the said above one of the main benefits of interpolation with oversampling is the spread of quantization noise over the band PSD −fn/2 B A 0 A B fs/2 PSD −fos/2 B A 0 A B fos/2 Quantization noise spill throughout the OS range Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Oversampling cont'd We can see that the in-band quantization noise will be much less after the decimation filter: P fc fs/2 F Quantization noise in-band and after filtering Theoretical SNR performance (straight oversampling) f SNR = 6:02N + 1:77 + 10log os [dB] (3) fn Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Noise shaping Oversampling with noise shaping E Y H(f) U Quantizer Σ∆ modulator (interpolator structure) 1 H = f (4) 1 Y = f U − Y (5) U E:f Y = f +1 + f +1 (6) Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Noise shaping cont'd Effect on the noise spectrum: Band of Interest 2nd Order 1st Order Quantization Noise W/O Noise Shaping fc fs/2 f0 fs/2 fs Quantization noise spectrum with noise shaping For a first order modulator SNRmax = 6:02N + 1:76 − 5:17 + 30log(OSR) (7) Doubling OSR gives SNR improvement for 1'st order modulator of 9dB (no noise shaping gave us 3dB) Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. High order modulators exist (two very popular): Interpolative Architecture e(z) u(n) y(n) H(z) H(z) H(z) Quantizer Multi-Stage Noise Shaping e1 x(n) z−1 D/A z−1 y(n) e2 z−1 e1(n) z−1 D/A Multi-Stage Noise Shaping structure Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Impacts of interpolation Increased dynamic performance SNR, SFDR, SINAD, etc. (quantization distortion is spread over the spectrum) Allows us to reduce the resolution of converters for the same performance requirements Trades-off filter complexity analog vs. digital - With analog filter order reduction, eventually noise induced from the filter is also decreased - Reduced sensitivity to process imperfections and drifts Choosing appropriate interpolation factor is a complex problem (with respect to filter design). Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs. Impacts of interpolation Possible high complexity in digital filter design Possible large power reduction (case specific) - For high L, static and dynamic power in digital filters may become very significant Possible large area reduction (very case specific) Reduces the effects of sample jitter (every output sample is avg. over many input samples) Taif Moshin, Deyan Dimitrov Interpolation and oversampling in data converters. Trade-offs..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us